38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, August 13, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Uttarakhand High Court Takes Cognizance After Advocate Makes Repeated Calls to Woman Judicial Officer

By Nargis Bano      09 July, 2021 05:07 PM      0 Comments
Uttarakhand Woman Judicial Officer

The High Court of Uttarakhand has taken suo motu cognizance of a case in which the secretary of the Laksar Bar Association, Navneet Tomar, allegedly made repeated phone calls and sent messages to a Woman Judicial Officer.

The Court has filed a criminal contempt petition against Tomar and has scheduled the next hearing for July 28, 2021.

A division bench of Chief Justice R S Chauhan and Justice Alok Kumar Verma directed Tomar to present his case either personally or through his lawyer.

The Court had previously served Tomar with a show-cause notice, asking why no action should be taken against him.

In the past, a single bench of the Supreme Court dismissed Tomar's plea for the quashing of the FIR and a stay of his arrest in the case.

According to officials, a Woman Judicial Officer at a Family Court filed a complaint at the Laksar Police Station alleging that Tomar had been sending her messages and calling her on a regular basis since June 10,2021.

Tomar was also accused of taking photographs with her at a function, having them printed, and sending them to her with bouquets and gifts.

He also visited the woman judicial officer's residence and her chamber on the court grounds, despite the staff's objections.

The police have filed a case against Tomar under various sections of the Indian Penal Code.

Tomar had previously stated in the petition filed before the single bench that he was the secretary of the Bar Association and that in that capacity, he attempted to present photographs and bouquets to the Judge of the Family Court.

He stated that he had gone to her chamber and house, which is why he had made the phone calls and sent messages to her.

Tomar's licence to practise advocacy had previously been suspended by the Uttarakhand Bar Council.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

hc-judges-in-no-way-inferior-to-sc-judges-sc
Trending Judiciary
HC judges in no way inferior to SC judges: SC

SC affirms HC judges are equal in stature to SC judges; directs apology for unfounded allegations against Telangana HC judge.

12 August, 2025 12:14 PM
law-does-not-require-to-provide-separate-list-of-electors-not-included-in-draft-rolls
Trending Judiciary
Law does not require to provide separate list of electors not included in draft rolls, EC tells SC

EC tells SC no legal mandate to publish separate list or reasons for voters excluded from draft rolls; affected persons can file claims under Form 6.

12 August, 2025 12:33 PM

TOP STORIES

in-house-procedure-had-legal-sanctity-sc-dismisses-justice-varmas-plea-against-recommendation-for-removal
Trending Judiciary
'In-house procedure had legal sanctity,' SC dismisses Justice Varma's plea against recommendation for removal

SC upholds in-house probe into Justice Varma, dismisses his plea against removal; says process is legally valid and judge’s conduct lacked credibility.

07 August, 2025 12:05 PM
sole-testimony-of-victim-even-without-medical-evidence-sufficient-to-uphold-rape-conviction-sc
Trending Judiciary
Sole testimony of victim even without medical evidence sufficient to uphold rape conviction: SC [Read Judgment]

SC: Victim’s sole testimony, even without medical evidence, sufficient to uphold rape conviction if found credible and consistent.

07 August, 2025 03:11 PM
sc-recalls-order-against-hc-judge-on-taking-away-criminal-roster
Trending Judiciary
SC recalls order against HC judge on taking away criminal roster

SC recalls order removing HC judge from criminal roster, cites institutional dignity; says directions weren’t to embarrass but to uphold judicial integrity.

08 August, 2025 12:43 PM
sc-declines-to-interfere-with-patkars-conviction-in-defamation-case
Trending Judiciary
SC declines to interfere with Patkar's conviction in defamation case

SC refuses to interfere with Medha Patkar’s conviction in 2001 defamation case filed by Delhi L-G V K Saxena, but sets aside ₹1 lakh penalty imposed on her.

11 August, 2025 02:29 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email