38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, January 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi High Court grants anticipatory bail to TV anchor Varun Hiremath in rape case

By Shreyas Nair      14 May, 2021 08:37 PM      0 Comments
Varun Hiremath Rape Case anticipatory bail

Justice Mukta Gupta presided over an in-camera hearing on Varun Hiremath's bail plea.

Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal and Advocate Vijay Aggarwal represented Varun Hiremath, who was briefed by a team from Karanjawala & Co. that included Sandeep Kapur, Rajat Soni, Niharika Karanjawala, Apoorva Pandey, G G Kashyap, and K Sharat.

The Prosecutrix was represented by Senior Advocate Nitya Ramakrishnan with Advocates Jai Anant Dehadrai, Sidharth Arora, Vinoothna Vinjam, Ashna Chhabra.

Varun Hiremath, a TV anchor, was granted anticipatory bail by the Delhi High Court on Thursday (May 13, 2021) in connection with a rape case against him. (State vs. Varun Hiremath) Justice Mukta Gupta issued the order, which said that the order would not be posted online and that the parties would receive a dasti copy.

Arguments in the bail plea were held in-camera. 

Last month, the Court granted Hiremath temporary immunity from arrest while awaiting a report from the Delhi Police, on the condition that he join the investigation. Earlier this year, an anticipatory bail application was filed by Hiremath with the Fast-Track Courts in Patiala House Court was rejected by an Additional Sessions Judge.

Hiremath alleged in court that the prosecutrix travelled from Pune to Delhi to meet him and willingly checked into a hotel room with him. The 22-year-old prosecutrix claimed that simply entering a hotel room did not indicate that she intended to engage in sexual activity.

The trial court had rejected the anticipatory bail plea, stating that the parties' prior relationship was irrelevant under Sections 53A Evidence of character or previous sexual experience not relevant in certain cases and 114A of the Indian Evidence Act.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

indias-business-families-seek-regulatory-recognition-of-daughters-in-law-as-relatives-under-sebi-takeover-norms
Trending Business
India’s Business Families Seek Regulatory Recognition of Daughters-in-Law as ‘Relatives’ Under SEBI Takeover Norms

Indian business families urge SEBI to recognise daughters-in-law as relatives under takeover norms, citing succession planning, trusts, gender equality and compliance risks.

09 January, 2026 05:58 PM
sc-bail-for-accused-added-under-section-319-crpc-requires-strong-and-cogent-evidence-not-mere-probability-of-complicity
Trending Judiciary
SC: Bail for Accused Added Under Section 319 CrPC Requires Strong and Cogent Evidence, Not Mere Probability of Complicity [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that bail for accused added under Section 319 CrPC requires strong and cogent evidence, not mere probability of complicity.

09 January, 2026 06:04 PM
pre-deposit-under-sarfaesi-act-must-be-made-before-drat-not-before-bank-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Pre-deposit Under SARFAESI Act Must Be Made Before DRAT, Not Before Bank: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala HC holds SARFAESI pre-deposit must be made before DRAT, not the bank, and writ petitions are not maintainable when a statutory appellate remedy exists.

09 January, 2026 07:08 PM
auction-authority-cannot-cancel-highest-bid-to-seek-better-price-in-fresh-auction-sc
Trending Judiciary
Auction Authority Cannot Cancel Highest Bid to Seek Better Price in Fresh Auction: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules auction authorities cannot cancel a valid highest bid merely to seek higher prices in a fresh auction, calling such action arbitrary and illegal.

09 January, 2026 07:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email