38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, March 17, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Mallyas review plea on transfer of $40 million to his children to be heard by SC on 20th August 2020

By Saumya Srivastava      07 August, 2020 03:44 PM      0 Comments
Vijay Mallya Supreme Court Kingfisher Airlines

On Thursday (6th August) the Supreme Court said that the hearing of the petition filed by businessman Vijay Mallya, seeking review of its 2017 order holding him guilty of contempt of court for transferring $40 million to his children will be held on 20th August. The matter came up for hearing through videoconferencing before a bench consisting of Justice U U Lalit and Justice Ashok Bhushan, where it was adjourned as one of the documents was not available on the record.

In June 2020, the top court had directed its registry to explain the reason behind Mallyas review petition not being listed before the concerned court for the last three years. The registry was asked to furnish all the details including names of officials who dealt with the file concerning the review petition in the last three years.

Mallya had filed the petition seeking review of the apex court's order dated 9/05/2017 under which he was held guilty of contempt of court for transferring USD 40 million to his children violating the order. The businessman is an accused in a bank loan default case of over Rs 9,000 crore involving his defunct Kingfisher Airlines and is in the United Kingdom presently.

The apex court had passed the 2017 order on a plea by a consortium of banks led by the State Bank of India (SBI), where it was said that Mallya had transferred USD 40 million received from British firm Diageo to his children, violating various judicial orders, allegedly.

The pleas of lending banks seeking contempt action and a direction to Mallya to deposit USD 40 million received from offshore firm Diageo respectively were being dealt with. The banks had alleged that Mallya concealed the facts and diverted the money to his son Siddharth Mallya and daughters Leanna Mallya and Tanya Mallya in violating the orders passed by the Karnataka High Court.

In May 2020, Mallya lost his application seeking leave to appeal his extradition to India in the UK Supreme Court, setting a 28-day clock on his removal from the UK. The decision of the top court of UK marks a big legal setback to the 64-year-old flamboyant businessman. He had also lost his high court appeal against an extradition order to India on charges of alleged fraud and money laundering related to unrecovered loans to his now-defunct Kingfisher Airlines.

Mallya has been based in the UK since March 2016 and remains on bail on an extradition warrant executed three years ago by Scotland Yard on 18th April 2017.

 

 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-cancels-anticipatory-bail-in-scst-atrocities-case-says-police-reconciliation-cannot-bar-fir-for-criminal-acts
Trending Judiciary
SC Cancels Anticipatory Bail in SC/ST Atrocities Case, Says Police Reconciliation Cannot Bar FIR for Criminal Acts [Read Order]

Supreme Court cancels anticipatory bail in SC/ST Act case, holding that police attempts at reconciliation cannot prevent registration of FIR for criminal acts.

16 March, 2026 02:44 PM
telangana-hc-sets-aside-dna-test-order-in-matrimonial-dispute-rules-child-cannot-be-used-as-pawn-to-prove-adultery
Trending Judiciary
Telangana HC Sets Aside DNA Test Order in Matrimonial Dispute; Rules Child Cannot Be Used as Pawn to Prove Adultery [Read Order]

Telangana High Court sets aside DNA test order in matrimonial dispute, holding a child cannot be used as a pawn to prove adultery against the mother.

16 March, 2026 05:35 PM

TOP STORIES

itat-mumbai-deletes-1159-crore-addition-under-section-69a-brokers-papers-and-retracted-statement-held-insufficient
Trending Judiciary
ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹11.59 Crore Addition Under Section 69A; Broker’s Papers and Retracted Statement Held Insufficient [Read Order]

Mumbai ITAT deletes ₹11.59 crore addition under Section 69A, holding broker’s papers and a retracted statement insufficient to prove alleged on-money receipts.

11 March, 2026 04:41 PM
prosecution-is-not-persecution-re-examining-the-constitutional-role-of-the-state-in-indias-criminal-justice-system-under-the-crpc-and-the-bnss
Trending Vantage Points
Prosecution is Not Persecution: Re-Examining the Constitutional Role of the State in India’s Criminal Justice System under the CrPC and the BNSS

Advocate Udit Arora examines how prosecution under CrPC and BNSS remains a constitutional duty—balancing justice, fairness, victim rights and protection of the innocent.

11 March, 2026 05:16 PM
sc-dismisses-mcgms-challenge-to-arbitral-award-holds-conduct-of-party-relevant-to-decide-jurisdictional-challenge
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses MCGM’s Challenge to Arbitral Award, Holds Conduct of Party Relevant to Decide Jurisdictional Challenge [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court dismisses MCGM’s challenge to arbitral award, holds party conduct relevant while deciding jurisdictional objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act.

13 March, 2026 12:31 PM
sc-pulls-up-railways-over-safety-measures-seeks-detailed-affidavit-on-fund-allocation-and-travel-insurance-disparity
Trending Judiciary
SC Pulls Up Railways Over Safety Measures, Seeks Detailed Affidavit on Fund Allocation and Travel Insurance Disparity [Read Order]

Supreme Court pulls up Railways over slow safety progress, seeks detailed affidavit on fund allocation and says counter ticket passengers cannot be denied travel insurance.

13 March, 2026 02:04 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email