38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, March 04, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC Slams Vijay Mallya, Justice Nariman Recuses Himself From Hearing Assets Liquidation Case

By LawStreet News Network      20 January, 2020 04:01 PM      0 Comments
SC Slams Vijay Mallya, Justice Nariman Recuses Himself From Hearing Assets Liquidation Case

The Supreme Court of India today (January 20, 2020) has slammed liquor baron Vijay Mallya for staying in hiding and escaping captivity. However, Justice Rohinton F Nariman has recused himself from hearing Mallyas petition on assets liquidation since his father, Fali S Nariman, appeared for the defence of Mallya in a different case before another bench earlier. It's a classic case of conflict of interests.

These properties refer to resources not associated at all to Mallyas failed organization, Kingfisher Airlines, under the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018.

Mallya had protested the appropriation of his assets in United Breweries Holdings Ltd. and other individual assets in the Bombay High Court, which had turned down his requests. This included privately owned businesses held by different individuals from his family. 

The Enforcement Directorate had asked the Prevention of Money Laundering Court to pronounce Mallya a fugitive and enable his properties to be confiscated, according to the FEO Act. 

Mallya had moved to the Apex Court challenging the confiscation of his unrelated and untainted resources on several counts: the FEO Act was used retrospectively, there was no provision for the return of assets if an individual was vindicated later, and the ED had agreed not to attach these assets.

Reached for a comment, Mallya said, I have not had any contact whatsoever with Mr Shashikanth. I do not have any knowledge about his Company Ultimate Branding Worldwide or its activities, read his email reply. I have never even heard of Tammy International, Dubai and have absolutely no connection with this Company. All my financial affairs including my sources of income and expenditure are fully disclosed before the English Courts in proceedings initiated by the Consortium of Banks. There is absolutely no question of any undisclosed sources of income. The English Court validated (approved) my living expenses and payment of legal fees after examining my proper income. Unfortunately, nonsense makes sensational headlines in India about me, it added.

Author: Swetalana Rout



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

rouse-avenue-court-discharges-arvind-kejriwal-manish-sisodia-and-21-others-in-delhi-excise-policy-case-slams-cbi-for-lack-of-evidence
Trending Executive
Rouse Avenue Court Discharges Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and 21 Others in Delhi Excise Policy Case; Slams CBI for Lack of Evidence

Rouse Avenue Court discharges Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and 21 others in Delhi Excise Policy case, citing lack of evidence.

27 February, 2026 12:29 PM
sc-imposes-blanket-ban-on-ncert-class-8-social-science-book-over-corruption-in-judiciary-chapter-issues-contempt-notices
Trending Judiciary
SC Imposes Blanket Ban on NCERT Class 8 Social Science Book Over ‘Corruption in Judiciary’ Chapter, Issues Contempt Notices [Read Order]

Supreme Court bans NCERT Class 8 textbook over ‘Corruption in Judiciary’ chapter, issues contempt notices and orders nationwide seizure.

27 February, 2026 01:00 PM
sc-holds-limitation-in-drugs-and-cosmetics-act-prosecution-begins-when-identity-of-accused-is-known-not-from-date-of-complaint
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Limitation in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Prosecution Begins When Identity of Accused Is Known, Not From Date of Complaint [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules limitation in Drugs Act cases begins when identity of accused is known, not from first complaint; Section 202 CrPC not mandatory for public servants.

27 February, 2026 01:30 PM
maintenance-obligation-absolute-cannot-be-evaded-on-pretext-of-unemployment-or-pendency-of-other-proceedings-andhra-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Maintenance Obligation Absolute, Cannot Be Evaded on Pretext of Unemployment or Pendency of Other Proceedings: Andhra Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Andhra Pradesh High Court rules maintenance is absolute; unemployment or pending cases cannot excuse a husband from paying wife and child.

02 March, 2026 01:00 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email