NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed for amending the petition challenging detention of activist Sonam Wangchuk over violence in Ladakh in September, 2025 as his wife claimed action against him was not based on genuine concerns of public order or security, and it suffered from gross illegality and arbitrariness.
Gitanjali J Angmo, the wife of the activist, claimed, the detention order relied upon stale, irrelevant, and extraneous FIRs.
"Out of the five FIRs relied upon, three pertained to the year 2024, bearing no proximate, live, or rational nexus to the detention of Wangchuk in September 2025. Moreover, three FIRs were registered against "unknown persons, do not name, Wangchuk," her fresh application read.
She contended there was thus no clear, live, proximate, or intelligible connection between the FIRs and the preventive detention of Wangchuk under the NSA, 1980.
On Wednesday, a bench of Justices Aravind Kumar and N V Anajaria, allowed Angmo to amend her petition within a week. The court scheduled her matter for further hearing on November 24.
For Angmo, senior advocate Kapil Sibal submitted that he has filed the amended application by adding more grounds challenging his detention order.
Wangchuk is currently lodged in Jodhpur central jail in Rajasthan.
Also Read: SC allows Wangchuk's wife to amend plea challenging activist's detention under NSA
Angmo stated that the respondents, including the Centre, have violated safeguards under Section 11(1) of the NSA.
"Wangchuk has not been afforded an effective opportunity to make a representation before the Advisory Board, thereby rendering the statutory safeguard illusory. Section 11(1) of the NSA necessarily contemplates that the detenu must not only be informed of his right of representation but must be placed in a fair position to exercise that right effectively, with access to all material relied upon by the detaining authority," her plea said.
She claimed that by denying the authorised "friend" access to the complete grounds and supporting material, the detaining authority effectively obstructed Wangchuk's preparation of a meaningful representation, thereby frustrating the very object of Section 11(1) of the NSA in contravention of settled law
"The continued detention of Wangchuk should be vitiated on account of the grave and incurable procedural lapses committed by the respondents. These lapses strike at the foundation of the constitutional and statutory safeguards embodied under the NSA, 1980," her plea contended.
On October 6, the court issued notice and sought response from the Centre, Union Territory of Ladakh, Superintendent of Police Jodhpur Central jail, after hearing the plea of Angmo against his detention and seeking his release.
Wangchuk was arrested on September 26, after the violence in Ladakh claimed lives of four people left scores others as injured over the demand for statehood for the region.
In an affidavit, the Leh District Magistrate earlier told the court that activist Wangchuk indulged in activities prejudicial to the national security, resulting into his detention under the National Security Act.
Disclaimer: This content is produced and published by LawStreet Journal Media for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The views expressed are independent of any legal practice of the individuals involved.
