New Delhi, India  
Judiciary

Wife’s failure to care for In-Laws does not amount to cruelty when husband lives separately: Allahabad HC [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      27 August, 2024 02:42 PM      0 Comments
Wifes failure to care for In Laws does not amount to cruelty when husband lives separately Allahabad HC

Allahabad: The Allahabad High Court has delivered a significant ruling, clarifying that a wife’s failure to care for her in-laws does not constitute cruelty when the husband chooses to live separately from his parents.

A Division Bench comprising Justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Donadi Ramesh dismissed an appeal filed by the husband against the rejection of his divorce petition by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Moradabad.

The court noted that the appellant-husband had sought divorce on the grounds of cruelty, alleging that the respondent-wife had refused to fulfill her moral duty to care for his aged parents.

Rejecting the husband’s arguments, the court held, “Mere failure to care for aged parents of a spouse, particularly when the spouse has chosen to live away from his matrimonial home, may never amount to cruelty.”

The court further observed that the allegation of a daughter-in-law failing to adequately care for her in-laws is subjective. It stated, “What level of care was necessary, required, or desirable was never established by the appellant. In any case, no inhuman or cruel behavior was ever pleaded by the appellant that could have established the allegation of cruelty necessary for the dissolution of marriage.”

Expressing its view on the concept of cruelty in matrimonial matters, the court noted, “Cruelty, though available as a ground for dissolution of marriage, cannot be established through a straightjacket formula.”

The court, while referring to several Supreme Court judgments on cruelty, elaborated on the concept of cruelty in matrimonial law. It emphasized that cruelty must be of such a nature as to cause reasonable apprehension in the mind of the petitioner that it would be harmful or injurious to live with the respondent.

In conclusion, while dismissing the husband’s appeal, the court clarified that a wife’s failure to care for in-laws does not constitute cruelty, especially when the husband chooses to live separately from his parents. The court upheld the family court’s decision to reject the divorce petition.

 

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a law graduate from The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has a keen ...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

"No Loudspeakers For Azan, No Fundamental Right To Create Noise," Says Allahabad HC To Two Mosques [Read Judgment] "No Loudspeakers For Azan, No Fundamental Right To Create Noise," Says Allahabad HC To Two Mosques [Read Judgment]

Further reasoning of the court was based on consideration of the fact that a mixed population resides in that area, comprising Hindus and Muslims both, which lead to the tension between both the groups regarding the use of loudspeakers.

Allahabad High Court to Hear Ghazipur MPs Plea against Ban on Azaan Allahabad High Court to Hear Ghazipur MPs Plea against Ban on Azaan

Hence, although an ongoing religious practice, the use of loudspeakers in the performance of Azaan remains a debatable question.

There is NO minority in India currently: Former Justice SN Srivastava, Allahabad HC There is NO minority in India currently: Former Justice SN Srivastava, Allahabad HC

"Explore former Justice SN Srivastava's statement on the minority status in India, as he discusses the evolving dynamics of religious and cultural representation in the country.

TRENDING NEWS

writ-courts-cannot-examine-merits-in-section-16-arbitration-challenges-sc
Trending Judiciary
Writ Courts Cannot Examine Merits in Section 16 Arbitration Challenges: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules writ courts cannot examine merits while reviewing Section 16 arbitration orders; stamping objections can be raised under Section 34.

30 May, 2026 11:37 AM
god-wont-wait-for-ministers-madras-hc-questions-vip-darshan-system
Trending Judiciary
“God Won’t Wait For Ministers”: Madras HC Questions VIP Darshan System

Madras High Court questions VIP darshan in temples, saying all are equal before God, and hears PIL seeking abolition of paid and preferential access.

30 May, 2026 11:55 AM

TOP STORIES

can-a-testator-legally-disinherit-his-wife-and-children-in-favour-of-a-sibling-sc-answers
Trending Judiciary
Can A Testator Legally Disinherit His Wife And Children In Favour Of A Sibling ? SC Answers [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that excluding a wife and children from a Will in favour of a sibling is not by itself a suspicious circumstance.

25 May, 2026 01:07 PM
petition-filed-in-supreme-court-seeks-cbi-probe-into-fake-law-degrees-and-the-cockroach-janta-party-campaign
Trending Judiciary
Petition Filed in Supreme Court Seeks CBI Probe into Fake Law Degrees and the ‘Cockroach Janta Party’ Campaign

Petition in Supreme Court seeks CBI probe into fake law degrees and the “Cockroach Janta Party” campaign over CJI Surya Kant’s remarks.

25 May, 2026 02:15 PM
jharkhand-hc-takes-suo-motu-cognisance-of-alleged-sexual-assault-of-female-inmate-by-jail-superintendent
Trending Judiciary
Jharkhand HC Takes Suo Motu Cognisance of Alleged Sexual Assault of Female Inmate by Jail Superintendent [Read Order]

Jharkhand High Court takes suo motu cognisance of alleged sexual assault of female inmate by jail superintendent at Ranchi jail.

25 May, 2026 02:39 PM
delhi-hc-stays-coercive-action-against-indigo-in-rs-458-crore-gst-compensation-dispute
Trending Business
Delhi HC Stays Coercive Action Against IndiGo In Rs. 458 Crore GST Compensation Dispute [Read Order]

Delhi High Court protected IndiGo from coercive action in a Rs. 458 crore GST dispute over compensation received from a foreign engine supplier.

26 May, 2026 01:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email