38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Would form panel on Hindenburg-Adani row: SC [Read Order]

By LawStreet News Network      19 February, 2023 12:35 AM      0 Comments
Would form panel on Hindenburg-Adani row: SC [Read Order]

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday said it would select experts and maintain full transparency, in forming a committee to examine Hindenburg report, which resulted into massive loss to investors due to crashing of Adani group company share prices.

A bench of Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud and Justices P S Narasimha and J B Pardiwala did not accept a suggestion by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta to consider the name of experts on behalf of the Union government.

If the court were to take names suggested by the central government then it would amount to a government constituted committee, the bench said.

The bench said the court wanted full transparency for protection of interest of investors and it will form a committee so that there is a sense of confidence in the court.

Mehta, representing the Centre, submitted that there should be a holistic view and no unintended impact is caused in the security market.

The bench also clarified that it would not set up a committee under a sitting apex court judge to look into the Hindenburg report matter.

However, the court said it may set up a committee headed by a retired apex court judge.

We want to ensure transparency. In case we take your suggestions from a sealed cover, it automatically means the other party won't know, the bench said, reserving its order in the matter.

A batch of pleas were filed in the court in connection with the Hindenburg report controversy. Advocates Vishal Tiwari and Manohar Lal Sharma sought alleged conspiracy behind the US short seller firm's report. Congress leader Jaya Thakur sought probe into allegations made into the Hindenburg report against Adani group of companies.

[Read Order] 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email