38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, September 07, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Writ Petitions Against Bar Associations Not Maintainable: Bombay High Court [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      30 April, 2025 03:55 PM      0 Comments
Writ Petitions Against Bar Associations Not Maintainable Bombay High Court

Mumbai: The Bombay High Court has issued a definitive ruling that establishes Bar Associations as entities outside the scope of “State” under Article 12 of the Constitution of India, thereby rendering writ petitions against them inadmissible under Article 226.

In their detailed analysis, Justices G.S. Kulkarni and Advait M. Sethna examined the fundamental distinction between statutory bodies and voluntary associations, offering clarity on the appropriate channels for resolving disputes within professional organizations.

The court was hearing a writ petition initiated by four Kolhapur-based advocates who contested a notice from their District Bar Association. As per court records:
“This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed challenging the notice dated 01 April 2025 issued by Respondent No. 2 – Kolhapur District Bar Association, Kolhapur, whereby the members are informed that the dues payable by its members be cleared, and only after such dues are cleared, the members would be considered eligible to participate in the proposed elections.”

Addressing the fundamental question of maintainability, the court observed:
“We may, at the outset, observe that it is certainly not possible to draw any parity in regard to the statutory duties and obligations as conferred by law on the Bar Council, which is constituted under a statute, with that of a Bar Association, which is an association of persons.”

The court referred to previous precedents, stating:
“A Division Bench of this Court in the case of Rajghor Ranjhan Jayantilal vs. Election Scrutiny Committee of B.B.A. & Anr. was considering a similar challenge with regard to the elections of the Bombay Bar Association, when the Court held that a writ petition on such cause was not maintainable, as the Bombay Bar Association was not a ‘State’ within the purview of Article 12 of the Constitution of India.”

In a specific directive regarding appropriate remedies, the court instructed:
“It is not the case that the petitioners are remediless. To assail any actions inter se between the members and the Bar Association, the petitioners may approach the appropriate Civil Court by filing a civil suit for redressal of their grievances.”

The court emphasized the potential consequences of treating Bar Associations as State entities, noting:
“If we accept the petitioners’ contention that the petition be entertained, then in such an event, any dispute whatsoever between the members and the Bar Associations would require the High Court to exercise its power of judicial review by entertaining writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution and adjudicating such disputes.”

The court also expressed concern about wider implications:
“In our opinion, if we entertain writ petitions on such causes, things would not stop only at the Bar Associations formed by advocates. The same logic would be required to be applied to associations of other professional bodies, like the associations of doctors, chartered accountants, and engineers, to name a few, which also discharge duties towards their members and the public.”

The petition was dismissed with the observation that treating Bar Associations as ‘State’ would lead to a “chaotic situation” in the functioning of these professional bodies.

Adv. Abhishek Nandimath, along with Adv. Shardul Diwan and Adv. Advait Vajaratkar, appeared for the petitioners.

Case Title: Shri Abhijeet Appasaheb Bacche-Patil & Ors. vs. The Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa & Anr.

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a final-year law student at The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Kedarnath Movie: Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL To Stay Release Kedarnath Movie: Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL To Stay Release

The Bombay High Court on December 6, 2018, dismissed a petition filed against upcoming movie Kedarnath seeking a direction to stay the release of the movie

Husband Can Also Claim Alimony/Maintenance From Wife: Bombay High Court Orders Woman To Pay Alimony To Ex-Husband [Read Order] Husband Can Also Claim Alimony/Maintenance From Wife: Bombay High Court Orders Woman To Pay Alimony To Ex-Husband [Read Order]

Husband Can Also Claim Alimony/Maintenance From Wife: Bombay High Court Orders Woman To Pay Alimony To Ex-Husband || "It is open for the court to decide the application filed by the husband under Section 25 of the 1955 Act, seeking monthly maintenance, by way of final proceedings, pending which, the application for interim maintenance filed under Section 24 of the Act of 1955, has been rightly entertained by the learned Judge and the husband has been held entitled to interim maintenance while the proceedings under Section 25 are pending," she noted.

Maharashtra Cabinet Minister Nawab Malik Approaches Supreme Court Against ED Arrest After Bombay High Court Refuses Relief Maharashtra Cabinet Minister Nawab Malik Approaches Supreme Court Against ED Arrest After Bombay High Court Refuses Relief

Maharashtra Cabinet Minister Nawab Malik Approaches Supreme Court Against ED Arrest After Bombay High Court Refuses Relief || "There is something or the other going against every leader of the NCP, Congress and Shiv Sena... Prime Minister Narendra Modi has one thing in mind: he wants BJP rule from Kashmir to Kanyakumari, irrespective of the wishes of the people," Pawar said.

Salman Khan Approaches Bombay High Court Challenging Summons By  Lower Court Against Complaint of a Journalist Salman Khan Approaches Bombay High Court Challenging Summons By Lower Court Against Complaint of a Journalist

The magistrate court issues the process if it finds prima facie substance in the allegations made in the complaint. Once the process is issued, the accused persons have to appear before the court.

TRENDING NEWS

wife-living-in-adultery-not-entitled-to-maintenance-rules-delhi-court
Trending Judiciary
Wife Living In Adultery Not Entitled To Maintenance, Rules Delhi Court

Delhi court denies maintenance to woman under Section 125 CrPC, ruling that a wife proven to be living in adultery is disqualified from claiming support.

06 September, 2025 06:32 PM
sc-dissolves-marriage-faced-deadlock-over-1951-model-antique-hand-made-classic-rolls-royce-car
Trending Judiciary
SC dissolves marriage faced deadlock over 1951 model antique hand-made classic Rolls Royce car [Read Order]

SC dissolves marriage invoking Article 142 after dispute over 1951 Rolls Royce; man agrees to pay ₹2.25 cr in mediated settlement.

06 September, 2025 06:44 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-approves-ecs-move-to-accept-claims-or-objections-to-draft-electoral-rolls-beyond-sep-1
Trending Judiciary
SC approves EC's move to accept claims or objections to draft electoral rolls beyond Sep 1

SC allows EC to accept claims and objections to Bihar draft electoral rolls even after Sept 1 deadline, till last date of nominations.

01 September, 2025 02:54 PM
sc-declines-to-entertain-pil-against-20-per-cent-ethanol-blended-petrol-e20-fuel
Trending Judiciary
SC declines to entertain PIL against 20 per cent ethanol-blended petrol, E20 fuel

SC declines PIL against Centre’s E20 fuel rollout, upholding ethanol-blended petrol policy despite concerns on efficiency and vehicle damage.

01 September, 2025 03:01 PM
sc-notice-on-tns-plea-against-hcs-judgment-on-implementation-of-rte-act
Trending Judiciary
SC notice on TN's plea against HC's judgment on implementation of RTE Act

SC issues notice on Tamil Nadu plea against Madras HC order making state solely liable for RTE Act funding, seeks Centre’s response.

01 September, 2025 04:35 PM
sc-upholds-telanganas-4-year-residence-rule-to-avail-domicile-quota-in-medical-admissions
Trending Judiciary
SC upholds Telangana's 4-year residence rule to avail domicile quota in medical admissions [Read Judgment]

SC upholds Telangana’s rule requiring 4 years of study in the state for availing domicile quota in MBBS and BDS admissions.

01 September, 2025 06:02 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email