38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, April 15, 2024
Legal Insiders

FIRs Filed Basis Toxic Social Media Posts Against TV news anchor Amish Devgan : Senior Advocate Sidharth Luthra Tells SC

By Arundhuti Deshmukh      25 September, 2020 02:30 PM      0 Comments
Amish Devgan Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Wednesday (September 23, 2020) extended protection to TV news anchor Amish Devgan against any coercive action in cases lodged over his alleged defamatory remark against Sufi saint Khwaja Moinuddin Chisti during a show telecast on June 15, 2020.

A bench comprising justices A M Khanwilkar and Sanjiv Khanna asked Devgan's counsel to complete the pleadings in the case by serving copies of the petition to those who had filed complaints against the journalist in various states.

Senior advocate Sidhharth Luthra and lawyer Mrinal Bharti appeared for Devgan in the hearing conducted through a video link by the court, which extended the relief granted on June 26 to Devgan till further orders.

Five FIRs have been lodged against Devgan in Rajasthan, Maharashtra, and Telangana for using a derogatory term for the Sufi saint in the news debate show called Aar Paar on his channel on June 15.

However, he later tweeted an apology saying that he was actually referring to Muslim ruler Alauddin Khilji and inadvertently ended up naming Chisti.

Devgan moved the top court seeking a stay on the probe in criminal cases besides seeking their quashing. The court had stayed the pending or future probes in the case against the journalist by police agencies till Wednesday.

As regards the interim relief, till the next date of hearing, we deem it appropriate to pass ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (A) and (B) (which seek a stay of investigation in pending and future FIRs and the protection from possible coercive action), the top court had said in the order.

Issuing notices to Maharashtra, Telangana, and Rajasthan, the bench had asked Bharti to make the complainants, who have lodged FIRs, as parties to his petition and had listed the case for hearing on today.

Two FIRs for the alleged offence have been registered at Ajmer and Kota in Rajasthan and one has been lodged at Bahadurpura in Hyderabad, the plea said, adding that two such FIRs have been lodged at Nanded and Pydhonie in Maharashtra.

Devgan said he has already issued a clarification through a tweet and moreover, errors cannot be construed as criminal offences.

The journalist said that the plea concerned the life and liberty of the journalist. In a well-orchestrated manner - the Petitioner has been made a victim of country-wide filing of false and baseless Criminal Complaints and FIRs on one hand and on the other hand Petitioner, his family, and his crew have been abused unabashedly on the social media and by personal messages by unknown persons. The Petitioner has also received several death threats from various anti-social elements, the plea said.

It said that Devgan was holding a discussion on a petition filed before the top court on his show on June 15 on the issue of the Places of Worship Special Provisions Act.

During the course of the live heated discussion one of the panelists quoted Chisti(Hazrat Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti) and inadvertently, Petitioner (Devgan) who wanted to refer to the historical figure Khilji (Alauddin Khilji) as a marauder, mentioned the name Chisti, the plea said.

That immediately on realizing his inadvertent slip of the tongue during a heated debate in his news debate show Petitioner tendered a clarification and clarified that the name Chisti was mentioned by error and inadvertently, it said.

Devgan tweeted the clarification on his personal twitter account on the intervening night of June 16-17 and moreover, the channel carried video clarification featuring the journalist, the plea said.

One of the FIRs was lodged at Pydhonie police station in Mumbai against Devgan for allegedly hurting religious sentiments by referring to saint Chisti in derogatory terms in the TV program on the complaint of Arif Razvi, general secretary of Raza Academy.

 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

need-to-safeguard-judiciary-from-unwarranted-pressures-21-ex-judges-write-letter-to-cji
Trending Legal Insiders
Need to safeguard judiciary from unwarranted pressures: 21 ex-judges write letter to CJI

21 ex-judges write to CJI Chandrachud urging protection of judiciary from pressures undermining its integrity and autonomy.

15 April, 2024 12:17 PM
sc-notice-to-ed-declines-early-date-on-plea-by-delhi-cm-arvind-kejriwal-against-arrest
Trending Judiciary
SC notice to ED; declines early date on plea by Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal against arrest

SC issues notice to ED, declines early hearing on Delhi CM Kejriwal's plea against arrest in liquor scam.

15 April, 2024 03:08 PM

TOP STORIES

location-sharing-of-accused-as-bail-condition-sc-directs-google-to-explain-how-its-pin-location-sharing-work
Trending Judiciary
Location sharing of accused as bail condition: SC directs Google to explain how its PIN location-sharing work

Supreme Court directs Google to explain its PIN location-sharing feature as bail condition for accused, raising privacy concerns. Details sought on technical aspects.

09 April, 2024 02:06 PM
cant-jail-everyone-for-making-allegations-against-cm-sc-tells-tamil-nadu-government
Trending Judiciary
'Can't jail everyone for making allegations against CM,' SC tells Tamil Nadu government

Supreme Court rebukes Tamil Nadu, saying not everyone making allegations against CM can be jailed; restores bail for YouTuber Sattai.

09 April, 2024 02:07 PM
hc-dismisses-kejriwals-plea-challenging-arrest-by-ed-in-liquor-policy-case
Trending Judiciary
HC dismisses Kejriwal's plea challenging arrest by ED in liquor policy case

Delhi High Court dismisses Arvind Kejriwal's plea challenging his arrest by ED in liquor policy case, ruling it legal. Kejriwal remains in Tihar jail pending Supreme Court relief.

09 April, 2024 05:22 PM
sc-allows-man-to-undergo-potency-test-as-wife-claims-marriage-not-consummated-more-than-7-years-of-alliance
Trending Judiciary
SC allows man to undergo potency test as wife claims marriage not consummated more than 7 years of alliance [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court permits potency test for husband in divorce case where wife alleges marriage unconsummated after 7+ years.

09 April, 2024 05:38 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email