38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, May 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

SC lawyer Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad named as Additional Advocate General for Uttar Pradesh

By LawStreet News Network      11 November, 2021 06:15 PM      0 Comments
Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad Supreme Court

Renowned Supreme Court lawyer, Advocate Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad, has been appointed as the Additional Advocate General (AAG) for the State of Uttar Pradesh. In addition to him, Ravendra Kumar and Ajay Aggarwal have also been appointed as AAGs, as confirmed via an official email notification. 

Advocate Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad is an Advocate-on-Record (AOR) at the Supreme Court of India and has served as Standing Counsel at the National Green Tribunal (NGT). He took to law at an early age by following in the footsteps of his father, who was also ad advocate by profession.

He learned much about advocacy under the eminent guidance of Shri Soli Sorabjee and has appeared in several landmark cases before the Supreme Court to date.

As an Additional Advocate General, Advocate Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad will give advice to the Government of Uttar Pradesh upon legal matters and will perform other duties as referred or assigned to him by the Governor - Anandiben Patel.

The appointment of the Additional Advocate Generals is made by the respected Governor of the State under Article 165 of the Indian Constitution. The provision further calls for the appointment of a person who is qualified as a Judge of a High Court to be Advocate General for the State. 

 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

no-offence-under-sc-st-act-if-alleged-casteist-abuse-occurred-inside-private-house-sc
Trending Judiciary
No Offence Under SC/ST Act If Alleged Casteist Abuse Occurred Inside Private House: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules SC/ST Act offence is not made out if alleged casteist abuse occurred inside a private house without public view.

14 May, 2026 03:16 PM
madras-hc-bars-tiruppattur-mla-from-floor-test-over-disputed-one-vote-victory
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Bars Tiruppattur MLA From Floor Test Over Disputed One-Vote Victory [Read Order]

Madras High Court restrains Tiruppattur MLA from floor test participation over disputed one-vote victory and alleged electoral irregularities.

14 May, 2026 03:24 PM

TOP STORIES

delhi-hc-refers-to-larger-bench-issue-on-stage-of-hearing-accused-under-section-223-bnss-before-cognizance
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Refers to Larger Bench Issue on Stage of Hearing Accused Under Section 223 BNSS Before Cognizance [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court refers to Larger Bench issue on when accused must be heard under Section 223 BNSS before taking cognizance.

09 May, 2026 10:25 AM
hymen-intact-does-not-mean-no-penetration-delhi-high-court-upholds-pocso-conviction-of-tenant-who-raped-six-year-old-girl
Trending Judiciary
‘Hymen Intact Does Not Mean No Penetration’: Delhi High Court Upholds POCSO Conviction of Tenant Who Raped Six-Year-Old Girl [Read Order]

Delhi High Court upheld a tenant’s POCSO conviction for raping a six-year-old girl, holding that an intact hymen does not negate penetration.

09 May, 2026 12:42 PM
consumer-commission-directs-bus-operator-to-pay-50000-compensation-after-barat-reaches-wedding-destination-at-3-am-due-to-breakdown
Trending Judiciary
Consumer Commission Directs Bus Operator to Pay ₹50,000 Compensation After Barat Reaches Wedding Destination at 3 AM Due to Breakdown [Read Order]

Delhi Consumer Commission ordered a bus operator to pay ₹50,000 compensation after a Barat reached the wedding venue at 3 AM due to breakdown.

09 May, 2026 01:56 PM
sabarimala-reference-day-13-can-faith-justify-civil-death-and-genital-cutting-of-children-sc-bench-examines-religions-reach-over-the-body
Trending Judiciary
Sabarimala Reference Day 13: “Can Faith Justify Civil Death and Genital Cutting of Children?”: SC Bench Examines Religion’s Reach Over the Body

SC’s nine-judge bench examined whether religious practices violating dignity, bodily autonomy and conscience can claim protection under Article 26.

09 May, 2026 02:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email