38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

Ayodhya Case: SC To Hear Case On February 26

By LawStreet News Network      21 February, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Ayodhya Case: SC To Hear Case On February 26

A Supreme Court Bench comprising of Chief Justice of IndiaRanjan Gogoi and JusticesS.A. Bobde, D.Y. Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and Abdul Nazeer will hear the Ayodhya land dispute case on February 26, 2019, at 10.30 am.

A notice in this regard was issued by the court on February 20, 2019.

On January 9, 2019, the case was referred to a five-judge Constitution Bench comprising of CJI Ranjan Gogoi and JusticesS.A. Bobde, N.V. Ramana, U.U. Lalit and D.Y. Chandrachud.

The move came as a surprise considering earlier on September 27, 2018, the apex court Bench comprising of then Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, Justice Ashok Bhushan and S. Abdul Nazeer by 2:1 majority had declined to refer to a five-judge Constitution Bench the issue of reconsideration of the observations made in 1994 judgment of Ismail Faruqui v. Union of India that a mosque was not integral to Islam which had arisen during the hearing of the Ayodhya land dispute.

Subsequent to the reference, Justice Lalit who was part of a five-judge Constitution Bench recused himself saying he had been a lawyer in a related case.

As per the notice, Justice Ramana will also not be part of the Bench. Instead, Justices Ashok Bhushan and AbdulNazeer will be part of the Bench.

On October 29, 2018, a three-judge Bench of CJI Ranjan Gogoi with Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and K.M. Joseph had adjourned the hearing in the first week of January before an appropriate bench, to decide the schedule of hearing.

Thereafter, on January 4, 2019, the Bench deferred the hearing till January 10, 2019, stating that a special Bench will be constituted to pass further orders in the Ayodhya land dispute case.

Read the notice below.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email