38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, December 15, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

Bar Council Of India Constitutes 5 Member Committee To Look Into The Issue Of Dress Code For Lawyers

By Dolly Chhabda      13 April, 2022 11:33 AM      0 Comments
Bar Council Of India Member Committee Dress Code For Lawyers

The Bar Council of India (BCI) has apprised the Lucknow Bench of Allahabad High Court that it has constituted a five-member committee to have detailed deliberations with the bar and the judiciary on the demand to redetermine the dress code of lawyers viz black coat, gown and band.

The issue relates to detailed deliberations with stakeholders, including senior members of the bar and the judiciary, before the issue can be decided, the BCI said in the resolution of August 2021.

Hearing a PIL on July 16, 2021, seeking ban on lawyers present dress code of black coat and robes, a bench of Justice DK Upadhyay and Justice AK Srivastava Ist had issued notice to the BCI , the central government and HC administration to file their responses. Filing the PIL, advocate Ashok Pandey challenged the provisions of chapter IV of the BCI Rules 1975 alleging that the same are ultra vires to the Constitution of India, violating the provisions of its articles 14, 21 and 25.
The petitioner has demanded from the court that it should direct the BCI to frame fresh rules for prescribing new dress code for lawyers in view of climatic conditions of the country.

The PIL also seeks quashing of the circular framed by the HC administration which mandates wearing of black robes for appearance before the HC. To this plea, the BCI resolution responded saying, At the time of framing of rules and neither today till date has it been given this kind of an interpretation.

The petitioner has also said, Wearing of white sari and salwar-kammej is symbol of widow ladies as per the Hindu culture and tradition and so there is no application of mind on the part of BCI while prescribing the present dress code for lawyers in the country. The black robes prescribed by the BCI and the High Court administration is unreasonable, unjust and improper and so violative of fundamental right of lawyers guaranteed under articles 14, 21 and 25 of the Constitution, pleaded the petitioner.

 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

ranveer-singhs-dhurandhar-barred-from-release-across-gulf-states-amid-content-sensitivity-concerns
Trending CelebStreet
Ranveer Singh’s Dhurandhar Barred from Release Across Gulf States Amid Content Sensitivity Concerns

Ranveer Singh’s Dhurandhar fails to secure release approval in six GCC countries amid concerns over politically sensitive content.

14 December, 2025 12:40 AM

TOP STORIES

scwla-hails-supreme-courts-historic-30-reservation-for-women-in-state-bar-councils-a-landmark-leap-for-gender-parity-in-the-legal-profession
Trending Legal Insiders
SCWLA Hails Supreme Court’s Historic 30% Reservation for Women in State Bar Councils: A Landmark Leap for Gender Parity in the Legal Profession [Read Press Release]

Supreme Court orders 30% reservation for women in State Bar Councils; SCWLA welcomes the landmark verdict as a major step toward gender equality in the legal profession.

09 December, 2025 04:45 PM
only-central-state-employees-fall-under-section-2e-gratuity-exclusion-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Only Central, State Employees Fall Under Section 2(e) Gratuity Exclusion: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules KSBC retired abkari workers are entitled to gratuity, holding that Section 2(e) exclusion applies only to government employees.

09 December, 2025 08:28 PM
civic-bodies-have-authority-to-revise-property-tax-rates-courts-cannot-substitute-judgment-on-policy-decisions-sc
Trending Judiciary
Civic Bodies Have Authority to Revise Property Tax Rates; Courts Cannot Substitute Judgment on Policy Decisions: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds municipal autonomy to revise property tax rates, ruling that courts cannot interfere in policy decisions absent arbitrariness or illegality.

09 December, 2025 08:35 PM
hostile-witness-testimony-cannot-be-rejected-in-toto-supreme-court-reiterates-settled-legal-position
Trending Judiciary
Hostile Witness Testimony Cannot Be Rejected in Toto: Supreme Court Reiterates Settled Legal Position [Read Judgment]

Hostile witness testimony cannot be rejected entirely, the Supreme Court held, reaffirming that credible portions supporting prosecution or defence must still be considered.

09 December, 2025 08:44 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email