38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, November 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

CJI Chandrachud names Justice Khanna as successor

By Jhanak Sharma      17 October, 2024 11:17 AM      0 Comments
CJI Chandrachud names Justice Khanna as successor

NEW DELHI: Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud has asked the Union government's Law Ministry, to name Justice Sanjiv Khanna, the second-most senior judge of the Supreme Court, as his successor.

Justice Chandrachud is set to retire on November 10, necessitating the naming of his successor.

In view of the convention and the Memorandum of Procedure, the central government requested the incumbent CJI last week requesting that he name his successor.

CJI Chandrachud, in response, named Justice Khanna as his successor for being the second senior most judge in the Supreme Court.

Justice Khanna will become the 51st Chief Justice of India, after the central government’s approval.

He will have a tenure of over six months in office and will retire on May 13, 2025.

Justice Khanna has been a part of several important judgments, including on dilution of Article 370 of the Constitution.

He was part of a bench, which gave a go-ahead to the Central Vista Project. A bench presided over by him gave interim bail to former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in an Enforcement Directorate case in connection with the Delhi excise policy case.

He was also part of the five-judge bench which struck down the 2018 electoral bonds scheme.

Justice Khanna enrolled as an advocate with the Bar Council of Delhi in 1983. He initially practised in the district courts at the Tis Hazari complex, Delhi, and later, in the High Court of Delhi and tribunals in fields as diverse as constitutional law, direct taxation, arbitration, commercial law, company law, land law, environmental law and medical negligence.

He also had a long tenure as the senior standing counsel for the Income Tax Department. In 2004, he was appointed as the Standing Counsel (Civil) for the National Capital Territory of Delhi. Justice Khanna was elevated as an additional judge of the Delhi High Court in 2005 and was made a permanent judge in 2006.

As a judge of the Delhi High Court, he held the position of chairman/judge-in-charge, Delhi Judicial Academy, Delhi International Arbitration Centre and the District Court Mediation Centres. He was elevated as a Judge of the Supreme Court on January 18, 2019. He held the post of chairman of the Supreme Court Legal Service Committee, from  June 17, 2023 till December 25, 2023.

He is presently the executive chairman of the National Legal Services Authority and a member of the governing council of the National Judicial Academy, Bhopal.



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

mere-use-of-word-arbitration-does-not-create-valid-arbitration-agreement-sc
Trending Judiciary
Mere Use of Word “Arbitration” Does Not Create Valid Arbitration Agreement: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that mere use of the word “arbitration” in a contract clause doesn’t constitute a valid arbitration agreement without clear intent.

08 November, 2025 01:14 PM
sc-issues-notice-on-plea-seeking-one-third-reservation-for-women-in-state-bar-councils
Trending Judiciary
SC Issues Notice on Plea Seeking One-Third Reservation for Women in State Bar Councils [Read Order]

Supreme Court issues notice on plea seeking one-third reservation for women in all State Bar Councils to ensure gender equality in legal governance.

08 November, 2025 01:39 PM

TOP STORIES

no-law-student-shall-be-barred-from-exams-or-academic-progression-due-to-attendane-shortage-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
No Law Student Shall Be Barred From Exams Or Academic Progression Due To Attendane Shortage: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC rules no law student can be barred from exams or academic progress for low attendance; directs BCI to rethink attendance norms and strengthen grievance systems.

03 November, 2025 04:03 PM
mere-refusal-to-marry-does-not-constitute-instigation-under-section-306-ipc-supreme-court
Trending Judiciary
Mere Refusal To Marry Does Not Constitute Instigation Under Section 306 IPC: Supreme Court [Read Order]

Mere refusal to marry does not amount to instigation under Section 306 IPC, rules Supreme Court, quashing FIR and holding no abetment in emotional distress cases.

03 November, 2025 04:15 PM
government-cannot-unilaterally-expand-labour-dispute-scope-without-workers-demand-himachal-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Government cannot unilaterally expand labour dispute scope without workers’ demand: Himachal Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Government cannot suo motu expand labour dispute scope without workers’ demand, rules Himachal Pradesh High Court, holding termination issues need separate notice.

03 November, 2025 04:21 PM
child-welfare-committee-cannot-direct-police-to-register-fir-allahabad-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Welfare Committee Cannot Direct Police to Register FIR: Allahabad HC [Read Order]

Child Welfare Committees cannot direct police to register FIRs, rules Allahabad High Court, holding their powers are limited to children needing care and protection.

03 November, 2025 04:29 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email