38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, July 25, 2024
Legal Insiders

CJI Sexual Harassment Allegations: Complainant To No Longer Participate In 3-Judge Inquiry Panel Proceedings [Read Press Release]

By LawStreet News Network      01 May, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
CJI Sexual Harassment Allegations: Complainant To No Longer Participate In 3-Judge Inquiry Panel Proceedings [Read Press Release]

Due to serious concerns and reservations about the proceedings of the three-judge inquiry panel, the woman who alleged sexual harassment by the Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi has decided to no longer participate in the proceedings.

In a press release dated April 30, 2019, the woman said that she felt "intimidated and nervous in the presence of three Hon'ble Judges of the Supreme Court and without having a lawyer or support person.

"I felt I was not likely to get justice from this committee and so I am no longer participating in the 3 Judge Committee proceedings, the woman said.

She pointed out the circumstances which led her to take this decision:

"1. I have not been allowed to have the presence of my lawyer/support person despite my impaired hearing, nervousness and fear.

  1. There being no video or audio recording of the Committee proceedings.
  2. I have not been supplied even a copy of my statement as recorded on 26th and 29th April 2019.
  3. I was not informed about the procedure this committee is following."

The complainant stated that "In the Committee hearing that took place on 26th April 2019, the Judges in the committee told me that this was neither an in-house committee proceeding, nor a proceeding under the Vishakha Guidelines and that it was an informal proceeding. I was asked to narrate my account which I did to the best of my ability even though I felt quite intimidated and nervous in the presence of three Hon'ble Judges of the Supreme Court and without having a lawyer or support person with me. I had also pointed out to the committee that I had lost hearing in one ear completely due to stress and I was undergoing daily treatment for the same. As a result of this I was sometimes unable to hear what was being dictated by Hon'ble Justice Bobde to the court official as a record of my statements before the committee. Further the committee declined my request for video recording of the committee proceedings. I was also clearly told that no lawyer/support person could be present with me during the committee hearing. I was orally instructed that I should not disclose the proceedings of the committee to the media and was to not even share the proceedings with my lawyer Advocate Vrinda Grover. I was asked to appear before the Committee on 29th April for the next hearing.

At the first hearing itself I had also placed an application before the Committee to summon the CDR and whatsapp call and chat records of two relevant mobile numbers. However the Committee did not accept my application on the first hearing. The same application was finally taken by the Committee on 30th April 2019, when feeling helpless and distressed I could no longer continue to participate in the Committee hearingsAfter I left the first Committee hearing on the first day, I saw that the car I travelling by was being followed by two men on a motorcycle whose partial number I was able to note. Before the next hearing I wrote a detailed letter to the Hon'ble Committee members, narrating all this and again requesting that the proceedings of the committee be treated as a formal inquiry and the Committee follow the letter and spirit of the Prevention of Sexual Harassment of Women at the Workplace Act, and that I be permitted to be accompanied and assisted by Ms V. Grover, that I be allowed to produce evidence both oral and documentary with a right to cross examination and that my applications be taken on record, the complainant further added.

She said that, she was compelled to walk out of the committee proceedings held on April 30, 2019, because the committee seemed not to appreciate the fact that this was not an ordinary complaint but was a complaint of sexual harassment against a sitting CJI and therefore it was require to adopt procedure that would ensure fairness and equality in the highly unequal circumstances that I am placed. I had hoped that the approach of the committee towards me would be sensitive and not one that would cause me further fear, anxiety and trauma.

Moreover, she also stated that I have not been informed if the committee has sought any response from the CJI to my complaint and I have been left guessing and anxious on all these matters.

On April 23, 2019, a three-member panel comprising of Justices Bobde, Ramana and Indira Banerjee was constituted by the CJI to probe the allegations levelled by the former court Staffer.

Later, Justice Indu Malhotra replaced Justice Ramana, after the complainant, in her letter stated that Justice Ramana is like a family member to CJI Gogoi and frequents his residence often. Owing to this close relationship, she was of the view that her complaint was not likely to get an objective and fair hearing. This led to the recusal of Justice Ramana.

[Read Press Release]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

investor-vishvanidhi-dalmia-accused-of-collusion-in-nsel-scam-maharashtra-govt-affidavit-reveals
Trending Judiciary
Investor Vishvanidhi Dalmia accused of collusion in NSEL Scam, Maharashtra Govt Affidavit reveals [Read Affidavit]

Investor Vishvanidhi Dalmia accused of colluding with NSEL's prime accused Jignesh Shah, as revealed in Maharashtra Government's affidavit filed in Bombay High Court.

24 July, 2024 09:34 AM
sc-declines-re-test-of-neet-ug-2024
Trending Judiciary
SC declines re-test of NEET UG, 2024

SC declines re-test for NEET UG 2024 due to insufficient evidence of systemic paper leak, affecting only 155 students and preserving the sanctity of the exam.

24 July, 2024 10:00 AM

TOP STORIES

supreme-court-allows-compounding-of-offence-in-cheque-dishonour-case
Trending Judiciary
SUPREME COURT ALLOWS COMPOUNDING OF OFFENCE IN CHEQUE DISHONOUR CASE [Read Judgement]

Supreme Court allows compounding of offence in cheque dishonour case, emphasizing the priority of compensatory aspects over punitive in settlements.

19 July, 2024 09:12 AM
allahabad-hc-directs-passport-authority-to-decide-on-application-without-prior-court-permission-in-pending-criminal-cases
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC directs Passport Authority to decide on application without prior court permission in pending criminal cases [Read Order]

Allahabad HC directs Passport Authority to decide applications without prior court permission for individuals with pending criminal cases within a specified timeframe.

19 July, 2024 10:03 AM
restrictions-in-law-not-to-prevent-constitutional-court-from-granting-bail-if-right-to-speedy-trial-infringed-sc
Trending Judiciary
Restrictions in law not to prevent constitutional court from granting bail if right to speedy trial infringed: SC [Read Judgement]

SC affirms constitutional courts can grant bail despite restrictive laws if the right to a speedy trial under Article 21 is infringed.

19 July, 2024 10:17 AM
sexual-harrasment-charges-against-wb-governor-sc-to-examine-constitutional-immunity
Trending Judiciary
Sexual harrasment charges against WB Governor: SC to examine constitutional immunity

The Supreme Court will examine a plea to investigate sexual harassment allegations against West Bengal Governor C V Ananda Bose, challenging his constitutional immunity.

19 July, 2024 01:46 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email