38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, March 11, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

Delhi High Court Allows Lawyers to Attend Office with the help of E-passes

By Priyam Jain      20 May, 2020 04:13 PM      0 Comments
Delhi High Court Allows Lawyers to Attend Office

A Division Bench of the Delhi High Court, on the petition filed by the DHCBA, has recorded the stand of the Government of Haryana that it has included Advocates as a category to whom weekly movement passes into and out of Delhi would be issued online at the www.saralharyana.gov.in within thirty minutes of the application being made. 

The state of UP has been directed to put in place either the same or similar facility for issuing of online passes for lawyers. Further, the lawyers can travel on showing the e-passes on mobile phones and there would be no necessity for a physical print out of the same.

Earlier today, the Haryana Govt. & Uttar Pradesh Govt. have submitted that they would allow the lawyers & other staff, who want to visit Delhi for court and legal work, by way of e-passes through its submission before the Delhi High Court. The Haryana government has submitted that it has agreed to issue weekly e-passes to all lawyers. The UP government in its affidavit filed on Sunday said that the advocates residing in Gautum Buddh Nagar & Ghaziabad who want to travel to Delhi to attend their private offices can apply to their respective Nodal Officer for e-pass for the issuance of the same. 

Before this decision, the Bar Council of Delhi had approached the HC raising concern over the restriction imposed by the neighboring states to advocates residing there over commute to their private offices in Delhi. It was also reported that during the last hearing matter the Additional Solicitor General Maninder Acharya, had assured the Court that an endeavor would be made to resolve the grievances raised in the petition to permit lawyers to cross the border to attend their private offices in Delhi. 

The Chairman of Bar Council of Delhi KC Mittal had raised the issues of lawyers, who are residing in the neighboring towns of UP & Haryana, practicing in Delhi and wanting to attend their offices to prepare for their cases and pending proceedings. He also submitted that in the view of guideline 7(F) issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) on the 1st May 2020, operations of private offices have been permitted. 

He also submitted before the court stating, As such lawyers within Delhi and outside Delhi are entitled to come to their office and attend to their work. The lawyers residing in NCR arent being allowed to cross the border by the Haryana & Uttar Pradesh, though they are bound by the guidelines issued by the MHA, and the movement of lawyers cannot be restricted in violation of Article 19(1)(d). 

The plea that was submitted before the Honble High Court of Delhi said that both the governments were not permitting lawyers to cross the borders to reach their offices and therefore cited the Union of India statement according to which Chartered Accountants & Advocates cannot be prevented from attending to their offices. Further, it was contended that as per the revised guidelines of the MHA for the opening of private offices, advocates cannot be prevented from coming to their respective offices. 

 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

tarun-holi-murder-case-delhi-police-पर-क्यों-नाराज़-हैं-पड़ोसी-law-street-journal
Trending Videos
Tarun Holi Murder Case: Delhi Police पर क्यों नाराज़ हैं पड़ोसी? || Law Street Journal

In this ground report on the Tarun Holi Murder Case, the team of Law Street Journal reaches Uttam Nagar, Delhi, where a shocking incident during Holi celebrations allegedly led to the death of a young man, Tarun. The dispute reportedly began after a Holi balloon thrown by a child accidentally hit a woman, which later escalated into a violent confrontation.

10 March, 2026 07:33 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-invokes-article-139a-withdraws-three-decade-old-criminal-revision-petitions-from-allahabad-hc-to-itself
Trending Judiciary
SC Invokes Article 139A, Withdraws Three Decade-Old Criminal Revision Petitions From Allahabad HC To Itself [Read Order]

Supreme Court invokes Article 139A to transfer three decade-old criminal revision petitions from Allahabad High Court to itself, citing exceptional delay and public importance.

06 March, 2026 04:18 PM
deity-may-not-vote-but-constitution-speaks-madras-hc-finds-wilful-contempt-over-delay-in-recovering-507-acres-of-temple-land
Trending Judiciary
“Deity May Not Vote, But Constitution Speaks”: Madras HC Finds Wilful Contempt Over Delay in Recovering 507 Acres of Temple Land [Read Order]

Madras High Court finds wilful contempt by officials for failing to recover 507 acres of temple land, remarking that a deity may not vote but the Constitution must protect its rights.

06 March, 2026 04:38 PM
intra-court-appeal-maintainable-against-ex-parte-ad-interim-orders-affecting-statutory-remedy-rights-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Intra-Court Appeal Maintainable Against Ex Parte Ad Interim Orders Affecting Statutory Remedy Rights: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules intra-court appeals are maintainable against ex parte ad interim orders that affect a party’s right to pursue statutory remedies.

06 March, 2026 04:59 PM
i-was-stalked-in-the-early-days-of-my-practice-justice-savitri-ratho-recalls-experience-at-iwil-national-conference
Trending Legal Insiders
“I Was Stalked in the Early Days of My Practice”: Justice Savitri Ratho Recalls Experience at IWIL National Conference

Justice Savitri Ratho recalls being stalked during her early legal career at the IWIL National Conference, highlighting challenges faced by women in the profession.

09 March, 2026 06:21 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email