38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, November 06, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

26 Advocates designated as 'Senior Advocate' by Jammu and Kashmir High Court [READ NOTIFICATION]

By Dev Kumar Patel      07 December, 2020 05:34 PM      0 Comments
26 Advocates designated as 'Senior Advocate' by Jammu and Kashmir High Court [READ NOTIFICATION]

On 03 December 2020, the Jammu and Kashmir High Court has designated 26 Advocates as 'Senior Advocate'

The notification issued by the Registry of the J&K High Court named the below-mentioned Advocates to be conferred with the 'Senior' title:

  1. Shri Abhinav Sharma
  2. Shri Anil Bhan
  3. Shri Abdul Majid Dar
  4. Shri Bimal Roy Jad
  5. Shri Chander Mohan Koul
  6. Shri Gagan Basotra
  7. Shri Javed Ahmad Kawoosa
  8. Shri Mir Syed Latif
  9. Shri Mohammad Altaf
  10. Shri Mohammad Yousaf Bhat
  11. Shri Mohsin-ul-Showkat Qadri
  12. Smt. Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
  13. Shri Nazir Ahmad Beigh
  14. Shri Nissar Hussain Shah
  15. Shri Om Parkash Thakur
  16. Shri Poshker Nath Goja
  17. Shri Pranav Kohli
  18. Shri Rahul Bharti
  19. Shri Rahul Pant
  20. Shri Rajiv Jain
  21. Shri Rohit Kapoor
  22. Mrs. Seema Khajooria Shekher
  23. Shri Showkat Ahmad Makroo
  24. Shri Syed Faisal Qadri
  25. Shri Vikram Sharma
  26. Shri Wasim Sadiq Narga

The notification was issued by the Registrar General Jawad Ahmed.

The notification was subjected to furnishing of undertaking in terms of Rule (4) of the Criteria for Designating Senior Advocates, 2018:

Rule 4 states that an advocate who has been designated as "Senior Advocate" shall furnish an undertaking that: 

  • He/she will abide by the rules regulating the practice of Senior Advocates 
  • He will not draft or file pleadings in any Courts and shall in all cases be assisted by another Advocate
  • He/she shall not directly give consultation to any litigant

 

[READ NOTIFICATION]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

instigation-for-suicide-need-not-be-compulsive-suggestive-words-enough-to-attract-section-306-ipc
Trending Judiciary
Instigation for Suicide Need Not Be Compulsive; Suggestive Words Enough to Attract Section 306 IPC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that instigation for suicide under Section 306 IPC need not be forceful; even suggestive words implying the consequence can attract liability.

05 November, 2025 04:10 PM
public-ground-cannot-be-reserved-for-any-religion-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Public Ground Cannot Be Reserved For Any Religion: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras HC rules public grounds cannot be reserved for any religion, allowing Annadhanam on village land and holding that law-and-order fears can’t curb fundamental rights.

05 November, 2025 05:10 PM

TOP STORIES

hit-and-run-accident-case-sc-transfers-trial-involving-judicial-officer-from-punjab-to-delhi
Trending Judiciary
Hit-and-run accident case: SC transfers trial involving judicial officer from Punjab to Delhi

SC shifts hit-and-run case involving probationer judicial officer from Punjab to Delhi over alleged bias; orders potential further probe by Delhi Police.

31 October, 2025 11:27 AM
sc-issues-stern-warning-to-state-bar-councils-over-excessive-enrolment-fees-threatens-contempt-action
Trending Judiciary
SC Issues Stern Warning To State Bar Councils Over Excessive Enrolment Fees, Threatens Contempt Action [Read Order]

SC warns State Bar Councils to stop charging over ₹750 enrollment fee or face contempt; directs BCI to issue circular, return applicants’ documents immediately.

31 October, 2025 11:32 AM
lawyers-cant-be-summoned-for-legal-advice-unless-covered-under-exceptions-of-sec-132-bsa-sc
Trending Judiciary
Lawyers can't be summoned for legal advice unless covered under exceptions of Sec 132 BSA: SC

Supreme Court rules lawyers cannot be summoned for legal advice unless exceptions under Sec 132 BSA apply, safeguarding lawyer-client privilege and legal profession autonomy.

31 October, 2025 02:29 PM
conviction-us-138-ni-act-cannot-be-ground-to-stop-pension-madras-high-court
Trending Judiciary
Conviction U/S 138 NI Act Cannot Be Ground To Stop Pension: Madras High Court [Read Order]

Madras HC rules conviction under Section 138 NI Act is not moral turpitude and cannot justify stopping pension of retired employee; directs release of dues.

01 November, 2025 04:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email