38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, May 18, 2024
Legal Insiders

Election Tribunal sets aside Karnataka Bar Council Election, orders BCI to conduct De-Novo elections before May 15

By LawStreet News Network      19 April, 2018 02:01 AM      0 Comments

The election to the Karnataka State Bar Council has been set aside by the Election Tribunal on April 17th, 2018. The decision was pronounced after the tribunal found out various illegalities in the conduct of the elections in line with the Bar Council of India resolution issued in February.

The order to this effect was passed by Chairman and former Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court Justice S.K. Mukherjee who presided the over the meeting, along with former Judge of Gujarat High Court Justice R.D. Vyas and former Judge of Patna High Court Justice Mridula Mishra.

The matter was taken into consideration on a complaint received by email on April 3 from Adv. H.R. Durgaprasad, a candidate for the post of a member in Karnataka Bar Council elections, alleging irregularities in the elections where voter list was not published as per the proper procedure, and that ballot boxes was given to private agency without any police protection while carrying the ballot boxes.

Mr. Durgaprasad further alleged that as per the BCI guidelines, the returning officer should have been a retired high court judge but in real it was the secretary of Karnataka Bar Council.

After examining the complaint, the tribunal held that the election of the Karnataka State Bar Council reveals a very sorry state of affairs.

Observations of the Election Tribunal

The Tribunal observed that as per the BCI resolution it is the duty of the special committee to engage one former Honble Court Judge as Returning Officer or in his/her absence a former Honble High Court Judge as an Observer, to look after the overall conduct of elections but no such appointment was made for election of Karnataka Bar Council by Special Committee, which has been a serious violation of norms laid down by Bar Council of India.

Further, the tribunal has discovered gross non-compliance of the BCI resolution by engaging a private agency to carry the ballot boxes The Ballot papers were, admittedly, transmitted to different locations by the Special Committee flouting the above referred Bar Council of India Election Resolution (number 3) by engaging a private agency. The Resolution part number 3 stipulated that proper police escorts for polling teams/concerned authorized personnel/s carrying ballot boxes/papers and adequate police force at polling booths. But, these norms have been given a complete go-bye.

In view of the above mentioned serious lapses to the election guidelines issued vide letter dated February, 22, 2018 and duly approved by the Supreme Court of India vide its order dated March 23rd, 2018 and in furtherance of the Supreme Court directions issued on March 13th, 2018, directing the committees appointed by the Bar Council of India to comply with all directions issued by Bar Council of India and to ensure its strict compliance, the, entire election process has vitiated the tribunal said.

De-Novo elections before May 15

The tribunal after taking note of all the illegalities said that We, therefore, set aside the entire election of State of Karnataka Bar Council. The Special Committee constituted by the BCI should conduct the election de-novo from the stage of polling after printing fresh ballot papers upon compliance of all formalities as per the directions of the Supreme Court of India and Bar Council of India. The BCI should appoint a former Judge to be returning officer and another former Judge from some other state to be the observer of the elections.

The Council should also request the Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court to direct the police official to co-operate with the returning officer and the observer. The Bar Council of India is to take necessary steps for conducting and completing the elections at the earliest, preferably before May 15th, 2018.

Share this article:

User Avatar

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Judiciary
Fundamental right to health includes consumers' right to be made aware of quality of products: SC [Read Order]

Right to health includes consumers' right to know product quality. Advertisers must submit self-declarations for ads to ensure transparency and accountability: SC

17 May, 2024 01:43 PM
Trending Judiciary
SC asks ED to file response to Soren's plea for interim on May 20

SC asks ED to file a response by May 20 to Hemant Soren's plea for interim bail during Lok Sabha elections, with a hearing scheduled for May 21.

17 May, 2024 06:12 PM


Trending Judiciary
Indian Courts this Week: Law Street Journal's Weekly Round-Up of SC & HCs [May 6 - May 10]

Get the latest updates from India's Supreme Court and the High Courts ! Here’s a round up of the week's top legal stories in a quick, easy-to-read summary.

13 May, 2024 10:29 AM
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses Union govt's plea against bail to Maoist financer in case of attack on police party in Jharkhand [Read Judgment]

SC rejects govt's plea against bail for accused in Jharkhand police attack case, citing absence of violated bail conditions.

13 May, 2024 11:33 AM
Trending Judiciary
Supreme Court upholds gang rape conviction, though victim turned hostile [Read Judgment]

SC upholds gang rape conviction despite victim's hostility, affirming witness credibility in criminal trials.

13 May, 2024 12:24 PM
Trending Judiciary
Sanatana Dharma remarks SC seeks response from UP, Maha, Ktka, Bihar, J&K on Udhayanidhi's plea for clubbing FIRs

SC seeks response on Udhayanidhi's plea for clubbing FIRs related to his remarks on 'Sanatan Dharma'.

13 May, 2024 12:39 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email