38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

Judges Wife Writes To Bombay HC Chief Justice, Alleges Dowry Harassment By Judge And In-Laws [Read Letter]

By LawStreet News Network      01 August, 2019 05:08 PM      0 Comments
Judges Wife Writes To Bombay HC Chief Justice, Alleges Dowry Harassment By Judge And In-Laws [Read Letter]

The wife of a civil court judge in Baramati has written to the Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court complaining that her husband and in-laws were harassing her.

After receiving the letter on July 29, 2019, Chief Justice Pradeep Nandrajog forwarded it to the registry of the High Court for preliminary inquiry.

In the four-page letter, written in Marathi, the 37-year-old woman alleged that her husband and in-laws began harassing her for dowry soon after her marriage on May 8, 2007. Her family, she said, gave her in-laws 5 lakh besides furniture, and took care of all the wedding expenses. Despite that, her husband and his family demanded a car and 30 acres of agricultural land.

After her fathers death on September 1, 2008, her husband and in-laws started demanding that her fathers land be transferred in her husbands name, the letter said. When she refused to do so, she was allegedly thrown out of her marital home by her in-laws.

The letter said that after she informed the Akola Police and the principal district judge, a complaint was lodged against her husband and in-laws. However, the police failed to take any action and only asked her to leave the husband and live with her mother.

In 2012, a sessions court in Akola district had granted ad-interim anticipatory bail to Badrinarayan Arbad, the judge in question, in the case filed by the woman alleging physical and mental torture. The judge was charged with offences under Sections 498 A, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

In September 2012, the husband judge filed a divorce plea at a family court in Akola, in which case the complainant sought maintenance from him. The family court, in 2016, ordered the husband judge to pay Rs. 10,000 maintenance, as per the letter.

I have received Rs. two lakhs as maintenance so far. However, the judge is delaying rest of the amount and I have filed an execution appeal, which is pending before the court, the letter said.

The woman has requested the Chief Justice of Bombay High Court to intervene in the matter and take necessary action against the judge for his alleged conduct.

[Read Letter]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email