38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, August 17, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Political NEWS

7 suspended BJP MLAs reinstated to the Delhi Assembly by Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

By Shreya Agarwal      07 March, 2024 06:40 PM      0 Comments

NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court has reinstated the 7 Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Members of Legislative Assembly (MLAs) who were suspended for allegedly interrupting Lieutenant Governor VK Saxenas address to the assembly at the start of the Budget session.

The Court held that the direction for suspending the Petitioners till the Committee of Privileges takes a decision cannot be sustained, as there had been no application of mind by the Speaker in referring the matter to the Committee of Privileges, the MLAs were not heard while being suspended till the matter is pending before the Committee,and since the punishment under Rule 77 of Chapter XI can be prescribed only after a Member is heard.

Further noting that the MLAs have already undergone the suspension of 14 sittings, the Court permitted them to rejoin the House forthwith. 

Holding thus, it disposed of the writ petitions.

The bench had reserved its verdict on February 27 on the petitions by the legislators.

The MLAs, represented by Sr. Advocates Jayant Mehta and Kirti Uppal, argued that the February 16 motion was unconstitutional and that they could only have been suspended for a maximum of three days.

The Court agreed with their contentions and reasoned that the MLAs had been given a punishment under Rule 44 of the Fifth Schedule which was not prescribed under the provision at all.

Further, it observed that they had not only been given a punishment in excess of what can be given under Rule 44 of the Fifth Schedule but had also been actually given a punishment under Rule 77 of Chapter XI which is a suspension for an indefinite period without even being heard.

They have punished me already and I am suspended. What the house has done through the motion is an unknown species. Its not known by the rules at all. You have already inflicted the punishment on me, Mehta had submitted.

On February 15, seven BJP MLAs Mohan Singh Bisht, Ajay Mahawar, OP Sharma, Abhay Verma, Anil Vajpayi, Jitender Mahajan and Vijender Gupta Petitioners along with other Members of the House had interrupted the address of the Lieutenant Governor and marched out. 

They were permitted to rejoin in the next sitting on February 16.

The same day, a motion was moved against them by Dilip Kumar Pandey, Chief Whip of Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), and the House took the decision to refer the question of breach of privilege and contempt to the Committee of Privileges and suspended the Petitioners till the Committee of Privileges would submit its findings.

They had allegedly interrupted LG Saxenas address outlining the policies and work of the Delhi government.

The MLAs had met the assembly Speaker Ram Niwas Goel after their suspension and tendered an apology to Saxena which was accepted by him.

 

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

A wanderer, aspiring yogini and writer. Shreya is a lawyer by profession, journalist by passion. A g...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Supreme Court asks Delhi LG to respond on plea related to Farishtey scheme Supreme Court asks Delhi LG to respond on plea related to Farishtey scheme

The Supreme Court of India has directed Delhi's Lieutenant Governor V K Saxena to submit an affidavit concerning the halted funding of the 'Farishtey Dilli Ke' scheme, which provides free medical aid to road accident victims. Amidst claims of non-involvement by the LG's office and responsibility attributed to the Health Minister, the court aims to resolve the governmental dispute hindering the scheme's operation. The plea emphasizes the urgent need to reactivate the scheme, citing hospitals' reluctance to admit accident victims due to unpaid bills.

Delhi HC warns DCPCR on misfounded plea against Delhi LG in fund issue Delhi HC warns DCPCR on misfounded plea against Delhi LG in fund issue

Delhi High Court today warned the Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) for its misfounded plea alleging that the Delhi LG had halted its funding.

7 suspended BJP MLAs reinstated to the Delhi Assembly by Delhi HC [Read Judgment] 7 suspended BJP MLAs reinstated to the Delhi Assembly by Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court reinstates the 7 BJP MLAs who were suspended for allegedly interrupting Lieutenant Governor VK Saxenas address to the Delhi Assembly at the start of the Budget Session.

Delhi LG Nominates AAP’s Kailash Gahlot For Flag Hoisting On Independence Day Amid Row Delhi LG Nominates AAP’s Kailash Gahlot For Flag Hoisting On Independence Day Amid Row

Delhi LG appoints Kailash Gahlot for flag hoisting on Independence Day, rejecting AAP's bid for Education Minister Atishi's role.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-interfere-with-patkars-conviction-in-defamation-case
Trending Judiciary
SC declines to interfere with Patkar's conviction in defamation case

SC refuses to interfere with Medha Patkar’s conviction in 2001 defamation case filed by Delhi L-G V K Saxena, but sets aside ₹1 lakh penalty imposed on her.

11 August, 2025 02:29 PM
sc-directs-for-removing-stray-dogs-in-delhi-ncr
Trending Judiciary
SC directs for removing stray dogs in Delhi NCR

SC orders removal of all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR within 8 weeks, to be housed in shelters; warns against obstruction amid rising rabies, dog-bite cases.

11 August, 2025 06:42 PM
hc-judges-in-no-way-inferior-to-sc-judges-sc
Trending Judiciary
HC judges in no way inferior to SC judges: SC

SC affirms HC judges are equal in stature to SC judges; directs apology for unfounded allegations against Telangana HC judge.

12 August, 2025 12:14 PM
law-does-not-require-to-provide-separate-list-of-electors-not-included-in-draft-rolls
Trending Judiciary
Law does not require to provide separate list of electors not included in draft rolls, EC tells SC

EC tells SC no legal mandate to publish separate list or reasons for voters excluded from draft rolls; affected persons can file claims under Form 6.

12 August, 2025 12:33 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email