38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, November 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Political NEWS

Supreme Court to hear on Oct 13 plea alleging delay in deciding disqualification plea against Ajit Pawar, other MLAs

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      09 October, 2023 05:34 PM      0 Comments
SC notice to Maharashtra Assembly Speaker on delay in deciding disqualification plea against Ajit Pawar other MLAs

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday decided to examine a plea by Sharad Pawar faction of the Nationalist Congress Party against delay in deciding their disqualification plea against Ajit Pawar and seven other MLAs under the Tenth Schedule (anti-defection law).

A bench of Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra scheduled the petition filed by NCP leader Jayant Patil, for consideration on Friday, October 13.

The bench had earlier fixed October 13 as the date for taking up a similar plea by Uddhav Thackeray's faction of Shiv Sena against the delay in deciding the disqualification petitions filed against Maharashtra's current Chief Minister Eknath Shinde and other MLAs.

"We had earlier asked the Speaker to fix a schedule. We will list the petition by Shiv Sena and this one together," the bench said.

On behalf of Ajit Pawar faction, senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi contended facts in both the cases were different. He said the instant matter is different. The petition for disqualification was filed only in September and soon after, they filed a petition in this court, he said.

Appearing for Patil, senior advocate Kapil Sibal submitted the petition was filed in July and even the notice was not issued by the Speaker.

In July, this year, in a sudden and surprise turn of events, Ajit Pawar along with other nine NCP MLAs joined the Shinde government in Maharashtra.

Pawar, who was the Leader of Opposition in Assembly, was appointed deputy Chief Minister. He was declared as leader of the legislative party of the NCP.

On September 18, the top court had fast-tracked the hearing on the disqualification petitions against Shinde and other Shiv Sena MLAs and asked the Speaker to list the matter before him within a week and fix a time schedule to decide disqualification pleas.

The bench had then said that the Speaker has to abide by the dignity of the Supreme Court and four months have passed since its judgement in May, where the court asked the Speaker, Rahul Narwekar, to decide the fate of 16 Shiv Sena MLAs, including Shinde, who were accused of anti-party activities.

On July 14, the Supreme Court issued notice to the Maharashtra Assembly Speaker on a fresh petition by Shiv Sena (UBT) MLA Sunil Prabhu seeking a direction to expedite decision on the disqualification petitions against Shinde and others.
 



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

mere-use-of-word-arbitration-does-not-create-valid-arbitration-agreement-sc
Trending Judiciary
Mere Use of Word “Arbitration” Does Not Create Valid Arbitration Agreement: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that mere use of the word “arbitration” in a contract clause doesn’t constitute a valid arbitration agreement without clear intent.

08 November, 2025 01:14 PM
sc-issues-notice-on-plea-seeking-one-third-reservation-for-women-in-state-bar-councils
Trending Judiciary
SC Issues Notice on Plea Seeking One-Third Reservation for Women in State Bar Councils [Read Order]

Supreme Court issues notice on plea seeking one-third reservation for women in all State Bar Councils to ensure gender equality in legal governance.

08 November, 2025 01:39 PM

TOP STORIES

no-law-student-shall-be-barred-from-exams-or-academic-progression-due-to-attendane-shortage-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
No Law Student Shall Be Barred From Exams Or Academic Progression Due To Attendane Shortage: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC rules no law student can be barred from exams or academic progress for low attendance; directs BCI to rethink attendance norms and strengthen grievance systems.

03 November, 2025 04:03 PM
mere-refusal-to-marry-does-not-constitute-instigation-under-section-306-ipc-supreme-court
Trending Judiciary
Mere Refusal To Marry Does Not Constitute Instigation Under Section 306 IPC: Supreme Court [Read Order]

Mere refusal to marry does not amount to instigation under Section 306 IPC, rules Supreme Court, quashing FIR and holding no abetment in emotional distress cases.

03 November, 2025 04:15 PM
government-cannot-unilaterally-expand-labour-dispute-scope-without-workers-demand-himachal-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Government cannot unilaterally expand labour dispute scope without workers’ demand: Himachal Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Government cannot suo motu expand labour dispute scope without workers’ demand, rules Himachal Pradesh High Court, holding termination issues need separate notice.

03 November, 2025 04:21 PM
child-welfare-committee-cannot-direct-police-to-register-fir-allahabad-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Welfare Committee Cannot Direct Police to Register FIR: Allahabad HC [Read Order]

Child Welfare Committees cannot direct police to register FIRs, rules Allahabad High Court, holding their powers are limited to children needing care and protection.

03 November, 2025 04:29 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email