38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Top Stories

2, 25, 910 companies under scanner of MCA for not filing returns

By LawStreet News Network      03 August, 2018 12:00 AM      0 Comments
2, 25, 910 companies under scanner of MCA for not filing returns

On August 3rd, 2018 the Union Minister of State for Law & Justice and Corporate Affairs Shri P.P. Chaudhary said in Lok Sabha that during financial year 2018-19, a total of 2,25,910 companies have been identified for action under Section 248 of the Act on the basis of non- filing of due returns for the financial Year 2015-16 & 2016-17. Due procedure shall be followed by ROCs before striking off names of companies.

Further, the minister said, that during 2017-18 the Registrars of Companies (ROCs) had identified 2.97 lakh companies which were not filing their Financial Statements or Annual Returns for a continuous period of two or more financial years and, prima facie, either were not conducting any business or were not in operation.

Out of such identified companies, Registrars of Companies (ROCs) removed the names of 2,26,166 such companies from the register of companies by following the due process under Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013, the minister added.

Moreover, P.P. Chaudhary said that the Central Government has ordered investigation into the true ownership of 68 number of companies under section 216 read with section 210(1) (c) of the Act, which have deposited and withdrawn fund in an exception manner from the bank accounts during demonetization period.

 

Details of the number of companies which have filed as well as not filed their financial statement during the last one year in state/UT-wise are as under:

Sl. No.Region (State, Province, County)Financial Statement filedFinancial Statement not filedAnnual Return filedAnnual Return not filed
1Andaman & Nicobar1458014978
2Andhra Pradesh8,1978,7098,1688,708
3Arunachal Pradesh1068010680
4Assam4,2711,2864,2901,262
5Bihar8,0096,7688,0806,699
6Chandigarh4,7182,4034,7672,358
7Chattisgarh4,5871,4504,5981,436
8Daman and Diu1704316943
9Delhi140,51946,204141,27045,472
10Dadra & Nagar Haveli2649026788
11Goa2,6251,0042,638992
12Gujarat40,70014,20640,74714,167
13Himachal Pradesh1,7071,1401,7431,110
14Haryana16,0327,05016,1086,991
15Jharkhand4,6182,8464,6592,818
16Jammu & Kashmir1,1438561,157842
17Karnataka37,21313,59437,39213,452
18Kerala15,8569,16515,9749,062
19Lakshadweep4637
20Maharashtra136,33562,001137,12261,149
21Meghalaya380151389143
22Manipur143109145107
23Madhya Pradesh13,8514,65313,9544,578
24Mizoram23202320
25Nagaland93929392
26Orissa7,9334,2537,9904,203
27Punjab10,2134,55910,2744,508
28Pondicherry596461608451
29Rajasthan24,2047,76624,2227,745
30Telangana29,97527,38330,09427,230
31Tamil Nadu40,99222,64941,00422,619
32Tripura120110122106
33Uttar Pradesh34,84318,17334,98218,049
34Uttarakhand2,3601,0582,3721,047
35West Bengal104,16922,599104,03822,695
TotalOverall Result697,115293,017699,718290,407


Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email