38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, May 13, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Vantage Points

Two Youtubers Face Trial For Copyright Infringement

By LawStreet News Network      19 January, 2020 09:01 PM      0 Comments
Two Youtubers Face Trial For Copyright Infringement

Two famous youtubers MxR and Potastic Panda with almost 840,000 subscribers, have been charged with infringement of copyright by Junkin Media. Both of them are known for making reaction videos where they used to react on materials like videos, movies, trailers, memes etc. While reacting on some videos, they unintentionally reacted on four videos owned by the Junkin media. Now the company is asking them to pay $6,000 or their accounts would be forfeited. 

Because of Youtubes stringent policies against copyright infringements, the two youtubers run a possibility of losing their channel along with millions of subscribers. According to Youtubes policy, if a channel receives three strikes against a copyright infringement and youtube receives a notification of it, their channel will be subject to termination. As the youtubers have received four strikes from the company, if it notifies youtube of the infringement, their account will be deleted.

MxR showed his concern by tweeting, because of the 'three strikes' rule, if he doesn't pay up Jukin Media could contact Google with all four claims at once and potentially "take down" the channel.

"Today we got hit with a huge bill of $6, 000," said MxR in a YouTube video which was viewed 1.3 million times. "I think it's because in the past we've paid them about $2,000 (1,500). If you don't pay they'll start striking your channel - they'll basically remove our channel if we don't pay them."

The Junkin Media also responded by saying that,YouTubers are "making money off of videos that don't belong to you". Their statement says that, As we've mentioned repeatedly, you can completely avoid any issues related to copyright by simply licensing videos on our website. In effect, you're taking other peoples' videos without asking them, then posting them to your channel and making money off of them. We never want to issue copyright strikes - we have a duty to do so to protect the copyright of the creators who have signed with us."



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

neet-ug-2026-exam-cancelled-over-rajasthan-paper-leak-allegations-cbi-investigation-ordered
Trending News Updates
NEET-UG 2026 Exam Cancelled Over Rajasthan Paper Leak Allegations, CBI Investigation Ordered

NEET-UG 2026 cancelled after Rajasthan paper leak allegations. CBI probe ordered as questions arise over exam security and students’ future.

12 May, 2026 05:39 PM

TOP STORIES

register-entry-not-mandatory-for-oppression-mismanagement-plea-under-companies-act-sc
Trending Judiciary
Register Entry Not Mandatory for Oppression, Mismanagement Plea Under Companies Act: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules formal entry in register of members is not mandatory to maintain oppression and mismanagement petitions under Companies Act.

07 May, 2026 10:51 AM
law-firm-terminates-partner-facing-pocso-charges-for-alleged-assault-of-six-year-old-daughter-mother-challenges-bail-before-bombay-hc
Trending Judiciary
Law Firm Terminates Partner Facing POCSO Charges for Alleged Assault of Six-Year-Old Daughter; Mother Challenges Bail Before Bombay High Court

A Leading Law firm terminates partner accused under POCSO Act for alleged assault of six-year-old daughter; Bombay High Court to hear bail challenge.

07 May, 2026 11:00 AM
sc-allows-lifting-of-corporate-veil-in-holding-company-cirp-to-include-subsidiary-assets-restores-earth-infrastructure-resolution-plans
Trending Judiciary
SC Allows Lifting of Corporate Veil in Holding Company CIRP to Include Subsidiary Assets; Restores Earth Infrastructure Resolution Plans [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court allows lifting of corporate veil in Earth Infrastructure CIRP, restores stalled project resolution plans, and denies GNIDA penal charges.

07 May, 2026 11:55 AM
sc-refuses-adjournment-in-pleas-against-law-removing-cji-from-ec-selection-panel
Trending Judiciary
SC Refuses Adjournment in Pleas Against Law Removing CJI From EC Selection Panel

Supreme Court refused to adjourn hearing on petitions challenging the law removing the CJI from the Election Commissioner selection panel.

07 May, 2026 12:12 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email