New Delhi, India  
Videos

Exclu Interview: Another petition by Adv. Chandra Shekhar challenging Places of Worship Act 1991

By Lawstreet Bharat      04 Jun 2022      0 Comments

1991 || Exclu Interview: Another petition by Adv. Chandra Shekhar challenging Places of Worship Act 1991 

1991

..................................................................................................................................................

Click Link below to View all Lawstreet Bharat News Reports: 

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLmSXfxrCiS5Z6l0hqLZioZUodQkeq5OQn ........................................................................................................................................................

 

Follow Subscribe to Lawstreet Journal for more Legal Content 

Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawstreetJ 

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawstreetjournal/ 

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawstreetjournal/ 

Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/c/LawStreetBharat/?sub_confirmation=1 

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/lawstreetjournal/ 



Share this article:

About:
Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Hindu Plaintiff to SC: Places Of Worship Act Not Applicable; Gyanvapi Not A Mosque; Property Continues To Vest With Deity Hindu Plaintiff to SC: Places Of Worship Act Not Applicable; Gyanvapi Not A Mosque; Property Continues To Vest With Deity

A three-judge panel: Justices Chandrachud, Kant, and Narasihma will take up the matter today at 3 PM. When it came to namaz and other religious rituals, Muslims had been concerned that a Civil Court order protecting the alleged location of a Shivling would interfere with their right of access to mosques. The Supreme Court overturned that decision on May 17.

Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah Dispute Of Mathura: Places Of Worship Act Not Applicable To 2020 Suit Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah Dispute Of Mathura: Places Of Worship Act Not Applicable To 2020 Suit

However, they said, the society (Shri Krishna Janmasthan Seva Sansthan) had no authority to sue and engage in a compromise (with Trust Masjid Idgah) in respect of land owned by the Trust, even if Shri Krishna Janmasthan Seva Sansthan was not its owner. The suit's maintainability was called into question, and as a result, it was dismissed. A motion for immediate revision was made by the petitioners in opposition to this, and the motion was approved yesterday.

Ashwini Upadhyay Who Challenged Places of Worship Act Seeks Impleadment In Gyanvapi Dispute Before Supreme Court Ashwini Upadhyay Who Challenged Places of Worship Act Seeks Impleadment In Gyanvapi Dispute Before Supreme Court

The Supreme Court had on Friday heard the Special Leave Petition regarding the Gyanvapi issue and had ordered that Order 7 Rule 11 Application being tried in the subordinate court of Varanasi be sent to the District Judge, as the Court was of the opinion that a seasoned hand would be required to handle the matter.

Exclu Interview: Another petition by Adv. Chandra Shekhar challenging Places of Worship Act 1991 Exclu Interview: Another petition by Adv. Chandra Shekhar challenging Places of Worship Act 1991

Exclu Interview: Another petition by Adv. Chandra Shekhar challenging Places of Worship Act 1991

Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email