38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, February 27, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Amazon requests Supreme Court to stay HC order until conclusion of Future-Reliance Deal dispute

By Shreyas Nair      12 April, 2021 12:19 PM      0 Comments
Amazon requests Supreme Court to stay HC order until conclusion of Future-Reliance Deal dispute

Amazon has moved the Supreme Court challenging the Delhi High Court's division bench order that had vacated a stay on Kishore Biyani-led Future Group proceeding with its Rs 24,713 crore asset sale to Reliance Industries.

Amazon asked for a stay of the division bench's (March 22, 2021) decision, calling it "illegal," "random," "inequitable," and "unfair" 

Future Group was issued a reprieve from a (March 18, 2021) single-judge order prohibiting it from selling properties to Reliance on (March 22, 2021), by a division bench of the High Court of Delhi. 

Amazon has now challenged the (March 22, 2021) injunction in the Supreme Court, seeking a stay until the conclusion of the earlier deal-related lawsuit. 

The Interim order & stay of the impugned Interim Common Order dated (March 22, 2021) passed by the Honourable High Court of Delhi before the questions raised herein are eventually resolved by this Honourable Court, Amazon wrote in its Supreme Court petition. Amazon's petition, a copy of which was seen by the news agency. It also asked the Superior Court to issue some further orders that it "may find fit & proper in the facts & conditions of the current case."

Amazon & Future Retail Ltd (FRL) did not respond to e-mailed queries:

The division bench made a grave mistake in passing an injunction in a non-maintainable appeal, allowing Future Group to continue to violate the EA (Emergency Arbitration) order, according to Amazon's plea. 

The single judge had delivered a well-reasoned order covering over 130 pages, according to Amazon, and the division bench had issued an emergency order in a mechanical way, halting operations for the same reasons. As a result, the petitioner (Amazon) came before this Court by filing an SLP (special leave petition), it said.

Previously, Amazon had filed a complaint with the Supreme Court after a single judge issued an interim order on February 2, 2021, halting the deal, and a division bench on February 8, 2021, stayed the order's action over a plea filed by FRL.

The Supreme Court then provided notice in response to Amazon's plea, allowing the scheme of a deal between Future and Reliance to continue before the Mumbai Bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), but these bodies were not to issue any orders sanctioning the deal.

The plea is set for hearing on (April 27, 2021).

The Future-Reliance contract, which is being challenged by multinational e-commerce behemoth Amazon, has already secured CCI, SEBI, and bourse approval, and the scheme of arrangement is now pending NCLT and shareholder approval. In the Rs 24,713 crore deal announced in August last year, Future Group's retail and wholesale assets will be consolidated into one company, Future Enterprises Ltd, before being transferred to Reliance Retail Ventures Ltd (RRVL). Meanwhile, Reliance Retail has extended the deadline for the sale to close by six months, to September 30, 2021.

Since the US e-commerce company took Future Group to SIAC arbitration in October last year, claiming that the latter had breached their contract by entering into the agreement with rival Reliance, the two companies have been embroiled in a bitter legal battle. In August of 2019, Amazon made a strategic investment in Future Coupons, with the option to buy into the flagship Future Retail after three to ten years.

On (October 25, 2020), a single-judge bench led by V K Rajah passed an interim order in favour of Amazon, prohibiting Future Retail from disposing of or encumbering its properties or selling securities to obtain funding from a restricted entity.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

rouse-avenue-court-discharges-arvind-kejriwal-manish-sisodia-and-21-others-in-delhi-excise-policy-case-slams-cbi-for-lack-of-evidence
Trending Executive
Rouse Avenue Court Discharges Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and 21 Others in Delhi Excise Policy Case; Slams CBI for Lack of Evidence

Rouse Avenue Court discharges Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and 21 others in Delhi Excise Policy case, citing lack of evidence.

27 February, 2026 12:29 PM
sc-imposes-blanket-ban-on-ncert-class-8-social-science-book-over-corruption-in-judiciary-chapter-issues-contempt-notices
Trending Judiciary
SC Imposes Blanket Ban on NCERT Class 8 Social Science Book Over ‘Corruption in Judiciary’ Chapter, Issues Contempt Notices [Read Order]

Supreme Court bans NCERT Class 8 textbook over ‘Corruption in Judiciary’ chapter, issues contempt notices and orders nationwide seizure.

27 February, 2026 01:00 PM

TOP STORIES

us-sc-strikes-down-trumps-global-tariffs-rules-ieepa-does-not-authorize-president-to-impose-duties
Trending International
US SC Strikes Down Trump’s Global Tariffs, Rules IEEPA Does Not Authorize President to Impose Duties [Read Order]

US Supreme Court strikes down Trump’s global tariffs, ruling that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose import duties.

21 February, 2026 02:45 PM
kerala-hc-issues-notice-to-cbfc-over-certification-of-the-kerala-story-2-goes-beyond
Trending Judiciary
Kerala HC Issues Notice to CBFC Over Certification of ‘The Kerala Story 2 – Goes Beyond’

Kerala High Court issues notice to CBFC over certification of The Kerala Story 2, questions safeguards under Cinematograph Act; release not stayed.

21 February, 2026 02:50 PM
sc-expresses-grave-concern-over-pre-election-freebies-cites-risk-to-national-development-and-work-culture
Trending Judiciary
SC Expresses Grave Concern Over Pre-Election ‘Freebies’, Cites Risk to National Development and Work Culture

Supreme Court flags pre-election freebies, warns of fiscal strain and harm to work culture while hearing challenge to Electricity Amendment Rules.

21 February, 2026 03:11 PM
caste-exists-only-in-the-minds-of-people-madras-high-court-bars-caste-suffixes-in-temple-festival-invitations
Trending Judiciary
“Caste Exists Only in the Minds of People”: Madras HC Bars Caste Suffixes in Temple Festival Invitations [Read Order]

Madras High Court bars caste suffixes in temple festival invitations, says caste exists only in minds; directs names be printed without caste tags.

21 February, 2026 03:26 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email