38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, October 19, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Consumer Court upholds penalty against Uber for abandoning passenger mid-trip [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      11 July, 2024 11:13 AM      0 Comments
Consumer Court upholds penalty against Uber for abandoning passenger mid trip

Punjab: The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission of Punjab has delivered a significant order, dismissing an appeal by Uber India Systems Pvt. Ltd. and upholding a District Commission order that found the company liable for deficiency in service.

A Bench comprising Judicial Member H.P.S. Mahal and Member Kiran Sibal dismissed the appeal filed by Uber against an order dated December 15, 2021, by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, S.A.S. Nagar (Mohali).

The case stemmed from a complaint filed by Mohit Bansal, who had booked an Uber cab from Zirakpur to Kalka on March 7, 2017. The complainant alleged that after traveling for about 10 minutes, the driver misbehaved, forced him to exit the cab, and charged Rs. 105 illegally.

The State Commission noted that Uber was granted sufficient opportunities to present its case before the District Commission but adopted a casual approach. The Commission rejected Ubers contention that it was merely a technology service provider not responsible for driver actions.

Importantly, the Commission observed that Under the CPA, the provision of a good or a service by an intermediary can also be used to challenge the intermediary/aggregator if it plays an active role in the provision of the good/service, making it more than a mere intermediary. The appellants control over the driver hints towards a similarly active intermediary role since a mere technological intermediary would not exercise such a high degree of control relating to booking, consideration, etc.

The Commission also dismissed Ubers argument that the destination was in an unserviceable area, stating that once the driver accepted the ride, he could not refuse to complete it on those grounds.

In conclusion, the State Commission upheld the District Commissions order directing Uber to pay Rs. 15,000 as compensation to the complainant for mental agony, harassment, and litigation costs. The Commission also ordered that the appeal deposit of Rs. 7,500 be remitted to the District Commission for potential release to the complainant.

 

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a final-year law student at The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Lawyers services not covered under Consumer Protection Act: SC Lawyers services not covered under Consumer Protection Act: SC

The Supreme Court ruled that lawyer services are not covered under the Consumer Protection Act, as their profession requires specialized skills, education, and training.

Consumer Court upholds penalty against Uber for abandoning passenger mid-trip [Read Order] Consumer Court upholds penalty against Uber for abandoning passenger mid-trip [Read Order]

Punjab Consumer Court upholds penalty against Uber for driver abandoning passenger mid-trip, orders Rs. 15,000 compensation and remittance of Rs. 7,500 appeal deposit.

Court orders Zomato to pay Rs 60000 for not delivering Rs 130 Momos Court orders Zomato to pay Rs 60000 for not delivering Rs 130 Momos

Court orders Zomato to pay Rs 60,000 for not delivering a Rs 130 momos order, highlighting the importance of timely customer grievance resolution.

SC dismisses plea for directions to mandate doctors to specify side effects of drugs SC dismisses plea for directions to mandate doctors to specify side effects of drugs

SC dismisses plea to mandate doctors disclose drug side effects; cites impracticality, upholds reliance on manufacturers’ inserts for information.

TRENDING NEWS

supreme-courts-diwali-decision-sparks-debate-crackers-faith-and-fairness-bolo-bharat
Trending Videos
Supreme Court’s Diwali Decision Sparks Debate | Crackers, Faith & Fairness | Bolo Bharat

As Diwali approaches, the debate reignites over the Supreme Court’s decision permitting the use of green crackers. Is this a balanced step toward sustainable celebration, or does it reflect a tilt toward community sentiment?

18 October, 2025 08:20 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-orders-cbi-probe-into-karur-stampede-during-rally-of-actor-politician-vijays-tvk
Trending Judiciary
SC orders CBI probe into Karur stampede during rally of actor politician Vijay's TVK

SC orders CBI probe into Karur stampede at Vijay’s rally; appoints ex-SC judge Ajay Rastogi to monitor impartial investigation into deaths of 41 people.

13 October, 2025 11:56 AM
sc-dismisses-plea-to-form-sit-to-probe-rahul-gandhis-allegations-of-electoral-rolls-manipulation
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses plea to form SIT to probe Rahul Gandhi's allegations of electoral rolls manipulation

SC dismisses PIL seeking SIT probe into Rahul Gandhi’s allegations of electoral roll manipulation; asks petitioner to approach Election Commission.

13 October, 2025 03:28 PM
sc-notice-to-centre-tn-kerala-on-plea-to-decommission-mullaperiyar-dam
Trending Judiciary
SC notice to Centre, TN, Kerala on plea to decommission Mullaperiyar dam

SC issues notice to Centre, Tamil Nadu & Kerala on plea to decommission 120-year-old Mullaperiyar Dam citing safety concerns and risk to 10 million lives.

13 October, 2025 03:32 PM
sc-rejects-singer-neha-rathores-plea-to-quash-fir-wrt-her-social-media-posts
Trending CelebStreet
SC rejects singer Neha Rathore's plea to quash FIR wrt her social media posts

SC refuses to quash FIR against singer Neha Singh Rathore over her social media post on Pahalgam terror attack; allows case to proceed under BNS provisions.

14 October, 2025 10:57 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email