38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, November 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Consumer Court upholds penalty against Uber for abandoning passenger mid-trip [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      11 July, 2024 11:13 AM      0 Comments
Consumer Court upholds penalty against Uber for abandoning passenger mid trip

Punjab: The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission of Punjab has delivered a significant order, dismissing an appeal by Uber India Systems Pvt. Ltd. and upholding a District Commission order that found the company liable for deficiency in service.

A Bench comprising Judicial Member H.P.S. Mahal and Member Kiran Sibal dismissed the appeal filed by Uber against an order dated December 15, 2021, by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, S.A.S. Nagar (Mohali).

The case stemmed from a complaint filed by Mohit Bansal, who had booked an Uber cab from Zirakpur to Kalka on March 7, 2017. The complainant alleged that after traveling for about 10 minutes, the driver misbehaved, forced him to exit the cab, and charged Rs. 105 illegally.

The State Commission noted that Uber was granted sufficient opportunities to present its case before the District Commission but adopted a casual approach. The Commission rejected Ubers contention that it was merely a technology service provider not responsible for driver actions.

Importantly, the Commission observed that Under the CPA, the provision of a good or a service by an intermediary can also be used to challenge the intermediary/aggregator if it plays an active role in the provision of the good/service, making it more than a mere intermediary. The appellants control over the driver hints towards a similarly active intermediary role since a mere technological intermediary would not exercise such a high degree of control relating to booking, consideration, etc.

The Commission also dismissed Ubers argument that the destination was in an unserviceable area, stating that once the driver accepted the ride, he could not refuse to complete it on those grounds.

In conclusion, the State Commission upheld the District Commissions order directing Uber to pay Rs. 15,000 as compensation to the complainant for mental agony, harassment, and litigation costs. The Commission also ordered that the appeal deposit of Rs. 7,500 be remitted to the District Commission for potential release to the complainant.

 

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a final-year law student at The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Lawyers services not covered under Consumer Protection Act: SC Lawyers services not covered under Consumer Protection Act: SC

The Supreme Court ruled that lawyer services are not covered under the Consumer Protection Act, as their profession requires specialized skills, education, and training.

Consumer Court upholds penalty against Uber for abandoning passenger mid-trip [Read Order] Consumer Court upholds penalty against Uber for abandoning passenger mid-trip [Read Order]

Punjab Consumer Court upholds penalty against Uber for driver abandoning passenger mid-trip, orders Rs. 15,000 compensation and remittance of Rs. 7,500 appeal deposit.

Court orders Zomato to pay Rs 60000 for not delivering Rs 130 Momos Court orders Zomato to pay Rs 60000 for not delivering Rs 130 Momos

Court orders Zomato to pay Rs 60,000 for not delivering a Rs 130 momos order, highlighting the importance of timely customer grievance resolution.

SC dismisses plea for directions to mandate doctors to specify side effects of drugs SC dismisses plea for directions to mandate doctors to specify side effects of drugs

SC dismisses plea to mandate doctors disclose drug side effects; cites impracticality, upholds reliance on manufacturers’ inserts for information.

TRENDING NEWS

mere-use-of-word-arbitration-does-not-create-valid-arbitration-agreement-sc
Trending Judiciary
Mere Use of Word “Arbitration” Does Not Create Valid Arbitration Agreement: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that mere use of the word “arbitration” in a contract clause doesn’t constitute a valid arbitration agreement without clear intent.

08 November, 2025 01:14 PM
sc-issues-notice-on-plea-seeking-one-third-reservation-for-women-in-state-bar-councils
Trending Judiciary
SC Issues Notice on Plea Seeking One-Third Reservation for Women in State Bar Councils [Read Order]

Supreme Court issues notice on plea seeking one-third reservation for women in all State Bar Councils to ensure gender equality in legal governance.

08 November, 2025 01:39 PM

TOP STORIES

no-law-student-shall-be-barred-from-exams-or-academic-progression-due-to-attendane-shortage-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
No Law Student Shall Be Barred From Exams Or Academic Progression Due To Attendane Shortage: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC rules no law student can be barred from exams or academic progress for low attendance; directs BCI to rethink attendance norms and strengthen grievance systems.

03 November, 2025 04:03 PM
mere-refusal-to-marry-does-not-constitute-instigation-under-section-306-ipc-supreme-court
Trending Judiciary
Mere Refusal To Marry Does Not Constitute Instigation Under Section 306 IPC: Supreme Court [Read Order]

Mere refusal to marry does not amount to instigation under Section 306 IPC, rules Supreme Court, quashing FIR and holding no abetment in emotional distress cases.

03 November, 2025 04:15 PM
government-cannot-unilaterally-expand-labour-dispute-scope-without-workers-demand-himachal-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Government cannot unilaterally expand labour dispute scope without workers’ demand: Himachal Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Government cannot suo motu expand labour dispute scope without workers’ demand, rules Himachal Pradesh High Court, holding termination issues need separate notice.

03 November, 2025 04:21 PM
child-welfare-committee-cannot-direct-police-to-register-fir-allahabad-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Welfare Committee Cannot Direct Police to Register FIR: Allahabad HC [Read Order]

Child Welfare Committees cannot direct police to register FIRs, rules Allahabad High Court, holding their powers are limited to children needing care and protection.

03 November, 2025 04:29 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email