38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, January 13, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Consumer Court upholds penalty against Uber for abandoning passenger mid-trip [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      11 July, 2024 11:13 AM      0 Comments
Consumer Court upholds penalty against Uber for abandoning passenger mid trip

Punjab: The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission of Punjab has delivered a significant order, dismissing an appeal by Uber India Systems Pvt. Ltd. and upholding a District Commission order that found the company liable for deficiency in service.

A Bench comprising Judicial Member H.P.S. Mahal and Member Kiran Sibal dismissed the appeal filed by Uber against an order dated December 15, 2021, by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, S.A.S. Nagar (Mohali).

The case stemmed from a complaint filed by Mohit Bansal, who had booked an Uber cab from Zirakpur to Kalka on March 7, 2017. The complainant alleged that after traveling for about 10 minutes, the driver misbehaved, forced him to exit the cab, and charged Rs. 105 illegally.

The State Commission noted that Uber was granted sufficient opportunities to present its case before the District Commission but adopted a casual approach. The Commission rejected Ubers contention that it was merely a technology service provider not responsible for driver actions.

Importantly, the Commission observed that Under the CPA, the provision of a good or a service by an intermediary can also be used to challenge the intermediary/aggregator if it plays an active role in the provision of the good/service, making it more than a mere intermediary. The appellants control over the driver hints towards a similarly active intermediary role since a mere technological intermediary would not exercise such a high degree of control relating to booking, consideration, etc.

The Commission also dismissed Ubers argument that the destination was in an unserviceable area, stating that once the driver accepted the ride, he could not refuse to complete it on those grounds.

In conclusion, the State Commission upheld the District Commissions order directing Uber to pay Rs. 15,000 as compensation to the complainant for mental agony, harassment, and litigation costs. The Commission also ordered that the appeal deposit of Rs. 7,500 be remitted to the District Commission for potential release to the complainant.

 

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a law graduate from The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has a keen ...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Lawyers services not covered under Consumer Protection Act: SC Lawyers services not covered under Consumer Protection Act: SC

The Supreme Court ruled that lawyer services are not covered under the Consumer Protection Act, as their profession requires specialized skills, education, and training.

Consumer Court upholds penalty against Uber for abandoning passenger mid-trip [Read Order] Consumer Court upholds penalty against Uber for abandoning passenger mid-trip [Read Order]

Punjab Consumer Court upholds penalty against Uber for driver abandoning passenger mid-trip, orders Rs. 15,000 compensation and remittance of Rs. 7,500 appeal deposit.

Court orders Zomato to pay Rs 60000 for not delivering Rs 130 Momos Court orders Zomato to pay Rs 60000 for not delivering Rs 130 Momos

Court orders Zomato to pay Rs 60,000 for not delivering a Rs 130 momos order, highlighting the importance of timely customer grievance resolution.

SC dismisses plea for directions to mandate doctors to specify side effects of drugs SC dismisses plea for directions to mandate doctors to specify side effects of drugs

SC dismisses plea to mandate doctors disclose drug side effects; cites impracticality, upholds reliance on manufacturers’ inserts for information.

TRENDING NEWS

ai-judges-the-future-of-algorithmic-decision-making-in-courts
Trending Vantage Points
“AI Judges” The Future of Algorithmic Decision-Making in Courts

Can algorithms deliver justice? This article explores AI judges, constitutional challenges, ethical risks, global models, and India’s cautious path forward.

12 January, 2026 07:07 PM

TOP STORIES

borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM
leela-palace-udaipur-ordered-to-pay-10-lakh-after-housekeeping-staff-enters-occupied-room-without-consent
Trending Business
Leela Palace Udaipur Ordered to Pay ₹10 Lakh After Housekeeping Staff Enters Occupied Room Without Consent [Read Order]

Chennai Consumer Commission orders Leela Palace Udaipur to pay ₹10 lakh and refund room tariff for breach of guest privacy by housekeeping staff.

07 January, 2026 09:43 PM
sc-strikes-down-bihars-midway-change-in-recruitment-rules-for-assistant-engineers
Trending Judiciary
SC Strikes Down Bihar’s Midway Change in Recruitment Rules for Assistant Engineers [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules recruitment criteria cannot be changed midway, strikes down Bihar’s retrospective amendment granting weightage to contractual engineers.

07 January, 2026 10:03 PM
only-light-and-not-any-fight-madras-hc-upholds-single-judges-order-allowing-lighting-of-lamps-on-deepathoon
Trending Judiciary
Only Light And Not Any Fight: Madras HC Upholds Single Judge’s Order Allowing Lighting Of Lamps On Deepathoon [Read Judgment]

Madras High Court upholds order allowing lighting of Karthigai Deepam at Deepathoon, rejecting public order objections and dismissing 20 appeals.

07 January, 2026 10:57 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email