38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, December 03, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Consumer Court upholds penalty against Uber for abandoning passenger mid-trip [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      11 July, 2024 11:13 AM      0 Comments
Consumer Court upholds penalty against Uber for abandoning passenger mid trip

Punjab: The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission of Punjab has delivered a significant order, dismissing an appeal by Uber India Systems Pvt. Ltd. and upholding a District Commission order that found the company liable for deficiency in service.

A Bench comprising Judicial Member H.P.S. Mahal and Member Kiran Sibal dismissed the appeal filed by Uber against an order dated December 15, 2021, by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, S.A.S. Nagar (Mohali).

The case stemmed from a complaint filed by Mohit Bansal, who had booked an Uber cab from Zirakpur to Kalka on March 7, 2017. The complainant alleged that after traveling for about 10 minutes, the driver misbehaved, forced him to exit the cab, and charged Rs. 105 illegally.

The State Commission noted that Uber was granted sufficient opportunities to present its case before the District Commission but adopted a casual approach. The Commission rejected Ubers contention that it was merely a technology service provider not responsible for driver actions.

Importantly, the Commission observed that Under the CPA, the provision of a good or a service by an intermediary can also be used to challenge the intermediary/aggregator if it plays an active role in the provision of the good/service, making it more than a mere intermediary. The appellants control over the driver hints towards a similarly active intermediary role since a mere technological intermediary would not exercise such a high degree of control relating to booking, consideration, etc.

The Commission also dismissed Ubers argument that the destination was in an unserviceable area, stating that once the driver accepted the ride, he could not refuse to complete it on those grounds.

In conclusion, the State Commission upheld the District Commissions order directing Uber to pay Rs. 15,000 as compensation to the complainant for mental agony, harassment, and litigation costs. The Commission also ordered that the appeal deposit of Rs. 7,500 be remitted to the District Commission for potential release to the complainant.

 

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a final-year law student at The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Lawyers services not covered under Consumer Protection Act: SC Lawyers services not covered under Consumer Protection Act: SC

The Supreme Court ruled that lawyer services are not covered under the Consumer Protection Act, as their profession requires specialized skills, education, and training.

Consumer Court upholds penalty against Uber for abandoning passenger mid-trip [Read Order] Consumer Court upholds penalty against Uber for abandoning passenger mid-trip [Read Order]

Punjab Consumer Court upholds penalty against Uber for driver abandoning passenger mid-trip, orders Rs. 15,000 compensation and remittance of Rs. 7,500 appeal deposit.

Court orders Zomato to pay Rs 60000 for not delivering Rs 130 Momos Court orders Zomato to pay Rs 60000 for not delivering Rs 130 Momos

Court orders Zomato to pay Rs 60,000 for not delivering a Rs 130 momos order, highlighting the importance of timely customer grievance resolution.

SC dismisses plea for directions to mandate doctors to specify side effects of drugs SC dismisses plea for directions to mandate doctors to specify side effects of drugs

SC dismisses plea to mandate doctors disclose drug side effects; cites impracticality, upholds reliance on manufacturers’ inserts for information.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

forklifts-and-cranes-used-inside-factory-are-motor-vehicles-registration-and-tax-mandatory-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Forklifts And Cranes Used Inside Factory Are ‘Motor Vehicles’; Registration & Tax Mandatory: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules that forklifts and cranes used inside factories are ‘motor vehicles’, requiring mandatory registration and tax under motor vehicle laws.

27 November, 2025 10:29 AM
loading-of-mineral-constitutes-transportation-us-21-4-of-the-mmdra-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Loading of Mineral Constitutes ‘Transportation’ U/S 21(4) Of The MMDRA: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala HC rules that loading minerals into a vehicle amounts to transportation under Section 21(4) of the MMDRA, upholding seizure for illegal mineral movement.

27 November, 2025 10:43 AM
sc-upholds-himachal-pradeshs-cancellation-of-tender-loi-sets-aside-high-court-order
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds Himachal Pradesh’s Cancellation of Tender LoI, Sets Aside High Court Order [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds Himachal Pradesh’s cancellation of a PDS tender LoI, ruling it created no enforceable rights and overturning the High Court order.

27 November, 2025 10:57 AM
chhattisgarh-hc-quashes-pg-medical-admission-rules-for-violating-article-14-rejects-institutional-domicile-preference-upholds-merit
Trending Judiciary
Chhattisgarh HC Quashes PG Medical Admission Rules for Violating Article 14, Rejects Institutional/Domicile Preference, Upholds Merit [Read Order]

Chhattisgarh High Court quashes PG medical admission rules, holding institutional and domicile-based preferences unconstitutional and affirming merit.

27 November, 2025 11:16 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email