38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, March 04, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Lalit-Bharat Hotel Group Promoter Jyotsana Suri Caught by Income Tax Department for Stashing INR 1,000 Crore in Foreign Assets

By LawStreet News Network      25 January, 2020 04:01 PM      0 Comments
Lalit-Bharat Hotel Group Promoter Jyotsana Suri Caught by Income Tax Department for Stashing INR 1,000 Crore in Foreign Assets

Eminent businesswoman Jyotsana Suri, promoter of Lalit Hotels and Bharat Hotels Group is caught for stashing Rs.1,000 crores-worth assets abroad illegally. The Income Tax Department conducted a two-three day search at her residences and offices in Delhi and Mumbai. She is now booked under the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 and the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988.

Jyotsana Suri, wife of hotelier late Lalit Suri is known for her proximity to the former Finance Minister, Late Arun Jaitley. She was also the head of many Industrial bodies such as the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI).

The Income Tax authorities revealed that Jyotsna Suri owned assets in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), the United Kingdom (UK) and had several bank accounts that were not declared and would be liable for prosecution under the Black Money Act also. The investigation has successfully lifted the veil, leading to detection of undisclosed foreign assets of more than Rs.1,000 crores, apart from domestic tax evasion of more than Rs.35 crores which may lead to consequences under the Black Money Act, 2015, as also, action under the I-T Act respectively, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) said.

Foreign assets include investment in a hotel in the UK, immovable properties in UK and UAE and deposits with foreign banks, it said.  The CBDT said the group is a leading member of the hospitality industry, running a hotel abroad and a chain of luxury hotels under a prominent brand name situated at various locations in India.

The search operation has so far resulted in the seizure of unaccounted assets valued at Rs.24.93 crores that include Rs.71.5 lakhs in cash, jewellery worth Rs.23 crores and expensive watches valued at Rs.1.2 croresthe statement said. The department had launched raids at 13 premises of the group, Suri and others on 19 January, 2020 in and around Delhi.

In 2014 , BJP leader Subramaniam Swamy in his petition to the Supreme Court accused Bharat Hotels of illegally obtaining the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) clearance during Chidambarams tenure and routed more than Rs.200 crores. 

 

Author: Nandini Gandhi



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

rouse-avenue-court-discharges-arvind-kejriwal-manish-sisodia-and-21-others-in-delhi-excise-policy-case-slams-cbi-for-lack-of-evidence
Trending Executive
Rouse Avenue Court Discharges Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and 21 Others in Delhi Excise Policy Case; Slams CBI for Lack of Evidence

Rouse Avenue Court discharges Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and 21 others in Delhi Excise Policy case, citing lack of evidence.

27 February, 2026 12:29 PM
sc-imposes-blanket-ban-on-ncert-class-8-social-science-book-over-corruption-in-judiciary-chapter-issues-contempt-notices
Trending Judiciary
SC Imposes Blanket Ban on NCERT Class 8 Social Science Book Over ‘Corruption in Judiciary’ Chapter, Issues Contempt Notices [Read Order]

Supreme Court bans NCERT Class 8 textbook over ‘Corruption in Judiciary’ chapter, issues contempt notices and orders nationwide seizure.

27 February, 2026 01:00 PM
sc-holds-limitation-in-drugs-and-cosmetics-act-prosecution-begins-when-identity-of-accused-is-known-not-from-date-of-complaint
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Limitation in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Prosecution Begins When Identity of Accused Is Known, Not From Date of Complaint [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules limitation in Drugs Act cases begins when identity of accused is known, not from first complaint; Section 202 CrPC not mandatory for public servants.

27 February, 2026 01:30 PM
maintenance-obligation-absolute-cannot-be-evaded-on-pretext-of-unemployment-or-pendency-of-other-proceedings-andhra-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Maintenance Obligation Absolute, Cannot Be Evaded on Pretext of Unemployment or Pendency of Other Proceedings: Andhra Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Andhra Pradesh High Court rules maintenance is absolute; unemployment or pending cases cannot excuse a husband from paying wife and child.

02 March, 2026 01:00 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email