38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, March 29, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

VLCC To Pay Rs. 1 Lakh Compensation To Fat Loss Client For Negligence

By LawStreet News Network      22 January, 2020 11:01 PM      0 Comments
VLCC To Pay Rs. 1 Lakh Compensation To Fat Loss Client For Negligence

Well knows beauty clinic VLCC has been ordered to pay Rs. 1 lakh compensation to a fat loss client who had sustained second-degree burn injuries while undergoing a fat reduction treatment offered by them at their Kolkata clinic by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kolkata unit in the case of Anna Louise Correia v. VLCC Health Care LtdOrder to this effect has been given by Honble Mr. Swapan Kumar Mahanty, President, and other Honble members Mrs. Sahana Ahmed Basu and Mr. Ashoke Kumar Ganguly on January 14, 2020. 

Facts of the case are as following: 

The complainant in the case was influenced by the attractive packages advertised along with interviews of former clients on Social Media as well as daily newspapers thereby approaching VLCC, Kolkata unit for availing their services in order to reduce her body fat within a stipulated period of time. She had spent a total Rs. 5,13,879.72/- till the month of February, 2018 on various treatments, but had not got satisfactory results. She was assured in the beginning that the whole procedure will be conducted with the assistance of any medical expert and/ or doctor, but it was not the case, procedure was conducted by one staff member only. 

One day while undergoing the treatment, she was left totally shattered when she sustained pain on her right side of lower abdominal area. Ultimately, she has to contact a private doctor for treatment. Following which, she was unable to do her normal activities which caused her intolerable pain and mental depression. She approached the clinic for refund of the money due to non-satisfactory service on their part, but they didnt agree. Hence, she approached the consumer forum under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The question that came before the forum for consideration was whether there was any negligence and deficiency in service on the part of the clinic during the treatment for which the complainant suffered loss and injury on her right side of lower abdominal area.

Interestingly, the complainant had signed a consent form prior to commencement of the treatment, and she was assured that the treatment which she is undergoing has no side effects, which was countered by VLCC by arguing that the result of treatment may vary from person to person and any post treatment adverse effect does not mean that they have done any wrong treatment in a negligent manner.

Findings of the Forum: 

It was found that there was negligence and deficiency in service on the part of VLCC as during the treatment, no expert was present and attendant who had given treatment to the complainant was also not highly skilled. Hence the forum concluded that the complainant is entitled to a refund of Rs. 2,00,069/-, the amount she had spent on the particular treatment, which caused side effects on her body, out of many treatments she had taken. While outlining the importance of awarding compensation bench reasoned that award of compensation of Rs. 1,00,000/- is reasonable or commensurate with the loss, injury, mental & physical pain and agony suffered by the complainant and it would adequately meet the ends of justice.

VLCC has been asked to pay the full amount ordered within 45 days of passing of the order. 

Author: Parth Thummar 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

court-uses-doll-to-record-testimony-of-deaf-mute-rape-victim-conviction-upheld
Trending Judiciary
Court Uses Doll to Record Testimony of Deaf-Mute Rape Victim, Conviction Upheld [Read Judgment]

Chhattisgarh HC upheld a rape conviction, recognising doll-assisted gestural testimony of a deaf-mute victim as valid and reliable evidence.

28 March, 2026 02:30 PM

TOP STORIES

conversion-to-religion-other-than-hinduism-buddhism-or-sikhism-strips-sc-status-sc
Trending Judiciary
Conversion To Religion Other Than Hinduism, Buddhism Or Sikhism Strips SC Status: SC

Supreme Court rules conversion from Hinduism, Sikhism or Buddhism leads to loss of SC status; SC/ST Act protection denied to Christian convert.

24 March, 2026 05:20 PM
privacy-vs-prohibition-sc-to-examine-legality-of-breathalyser-based-enforcement-in-bihar
Trending Judiciary
Privacy vs Prohibition: SC to Examine Legality of Breathalyser-Based Enforcement in Bihar

Supreme Court to examine legality of breathalyser tests under Bihar Prohibition law, raising key issues on privacy, evidence, and Article 21 rights.

25 March, 2026 06:14 PM
sc-reverses-high-court-acquittal-in-child-rape-case-directs-all-high-courts-to-strictly-follow-ban-on-disclosure-of-victims-identity
Trending Judiciary
SC Reverses High Court Acquittal In Child Rape Case; Directs All High Courts To Strictly Follow Ban On Disclosure Of Victim’s Identity [Read Judgment]

SC restores conviction in child rape case, reverses acquittal, and directs strict compliance with law prohibiting disclosure of victim identity.

26 March, 2026 02:05 PM
allahabad-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-swami-avimukteshwaranand-saraswati-in-pocso-case-rules-section-29-presumption-not-applicable-at-pre-arrest-stage
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati in POCSO Case, Rules Section 29 Presumption Not Applicable at Pre-Arrest Stage [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants anticipatory bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati, rules Section 29 POCSO presumption not applicable at pre-arrest stage.

26 March, 2026 02:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email