38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, February 19, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
CelebStreet

Delhi HC Summons Priya Kapur And Karisma Kapoor’s Children In ‘Fraudulent’ Family Trust Dispute

By Saket Sourav      29 January, 2026 06:01 PM      0 Comments
Delhi HC Summons Priya Kapur And Karisma Kapoors Children In Fraudulent Family Trust Dispute

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has issued summons to Priya Kapur and the children of actress Karisma Kapoor in a legal suit filed by Rani Kapur, the 80-year-old widow of late industrialist Dr. Surinder Kapur, alleging that a “fraudulent family trust” was orchestrated to unlawfully strip her of her entire estate and family legacy.

Justice Mini Pushkarna took up the case and issued notice on Rani Kapur’s application for interim relief, directing the 23 defendants to file their written statements within 30 days.

The court noted the complex family dynamics involved in the dispute, with defendants including Priya Kapur, her son Azarias, and Sunjay Kapur’s children with Karisma Kapoor, Samaira and Kiaan.

Rani Kapur, the mother of late Sunjay Kapur (former chairperson of Sona Comstar), asserts that she was the sole beneficiary of her husband’s estate following his death in 2015. However, she claims that after suffering a stroke in 2017, her son and his third wife, Priya Kapur, exploited her physical dependence to transfer her assets into the Rani Kapur Family Trust without her informed consent.

The plaintiff alleges that her signatures on the trust deed were forged, a claim she states is corroborated by a forensic expert. She further contends that the trust was designed to leave her “effectively penniless,” as the assets were earmarked exclusively for Sunjay Kapur during his lifetime, with 60% of the corpus going to Priya Kapur and the remaining 40% to her grandchildren upon his demise.

According to the suit, the alleged fraud was discovered only after Sunjay Kapur’s death due to cardiac arrest in June 2025. The plaintiff’s counsel highlighted a timeline of events following his death, stating that on June 13, Priya Kapur allegedly became a Director in a leading company holding assets, and on June 20, she reportedly became the Managing Director of the main holding company with a salary of ₹1 crore plus perks.

The suit further alleges that Rani Kapur’s access to company information was blocked under the false pretext that her email account had been “hacked.”

The legal battle also saw a shift in benches during the proceedings. On Wednesday, Justice Vikas Mahajan recused himself from hearing the matter and directed it to be listed before another bench. On Thursday, Justice Mini Pushkarna took up the case and issued notice on Rani Kapur’s application for interim relief.

The court directed the 23 defendants, including Priya Kapur, her son Azarias, and Sunjay Kapur’s children with Karisma Kapoor, Samaira and Kiaan, to file their written statements within 30 days.

The dispute involves several high-profile figures. Sunjay Kapur was previously married to designer Nandita Mahtani and actress Karisma Kapoor before marrying Priya Kapur in 2017. Notably, the suit was filed just days after the Delhi High Court reserved its verdict in a separate case brought by Samaira and Kiaan Kapur, who sought to restrain Priya Kapur and Azarias from creating third-party interests in their late father’s properties.

In its directions, the court stated that all defendants must file their written statements within the stipulated 30-day period and scheduled the next hearing for March 23, 2026.

Case Title: Rani Kapur vs. Priya Kapur & Ors.



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a law graduate from The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has a keen ...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property' 'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property'

In 2012, the Anjuman Committee addressed a letter to the Chairman of the Waqf Board stating there is a wall and Chabutrah (platform) on a 'Tiranga Ki Qalandari Masjid where in olden times laborers used to offer prayers.

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment] Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment]

The Delhi High Court sets aside an Arbitral Tribunal's award favoring IRB Pathankot Amritsar Toll Road Ltd over a delay in a highway project. The court finds that the tribunal did not address the essential dispute of whether the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) was in material default, rendering the award invalid.

Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order] Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order]

A Delhi court refuses to stay the defamation case filed by Union Cabinet minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat against Rajasthan Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot. The court declined to stay the summons and sets a hearing date for August 19.

Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case

Delhi High Court is set to begin day-to-day hearings from August 28 for appeals by CBI and ED against acquittals in the 2G spectrum allocation case, expressing displeasure over adjournment requests. The case involves former telecom minister A Raja and business entities. Learn about the proceedings and details of the case.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

madras-hc-directs-ms-dhoni-to-pay-10-lakh-for-transcription-of-cds-in-defamation-suit
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Directs MS Dhoni to Pay ₹10 Lakh for Transcription of CDs in Defamation Suit [Read Order]

Madras High Court directs MS Dhoni to pay ₹10 lakh for transcription and translation of CDs in his defamation suit against Zee Media.

13 February, 2026 02:36 PM
sc-holds-successive-fir-registration-to-keep-accused-in-custody-is-abuse-of-process-grants-bail-under-article-32
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Successive FIR Registration to Keep Accused in Custody Is Abuse of Process; Grants Bail Under Article 32 [Read Order]

Supreme Court calls successive FIRs to keep accused in custody an abuse of process, grants bail under Article 32 in Jharkhand case.

13 February, 2026 02:48 PM
sc-holds-post-arbitral-award-transferee-cannot-resist-execution-reaffirms-lis-pendens-doctrine-applies-to-money-decrees
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Post-Arbitral Award Transferee Cannot Resist Execution; Reaffirms Lis Pendens Doctrine Applies to Money Decrees [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules post-arbitral award purchasers can’t block execution; lis pendens applies to money decrees under Transfer of Property Act.

13 February, 2026 02:59 PM
sc-holds-anticipatory-bail-has-no-time-limit-protection-continues-after-chargesheet
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Anticipatory Bail Has No Time Limit, Protection Continues After Chargesheet [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules anticipatory bail has no time limit, continues after chargesheet, and High Courts can’t restrict protection to investigation stage.

13 February, 2026 03:11 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email