38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, March 19, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

All You Need to Know About the Three Labour Codes Cleared by Parliament [READ LABOUR CODES]

By Meghna Mishra      24 September, 2020 05:53 PM      0 Comments
All You Need to Know About the Three Labour Codes Cleared by Parliament [READ LABOUR CODES]

Three labour codes introduced by Labour Minister Santosh Kumar Gangwar were passed by the Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha. These codes comprise a part of the four codes that are included in the 29 Central Labour Laws.

Opposition Congress leaders Manish Tewari and Shashi Tharoor openly opposed these bills. Their reasoning was that bills introduced in 2019 were published for public consultations. These bills were withdrawn by the government and moved the fundamentally changed 2020 Bills, without further consultation. They also said that the Codes were not pro-labor and were a blow to the rights of the workers.

The salient features of these three Codes are explained below:

This bill gives power to the state government from exemption of new factories from the provisions laid down in the code. The objective behind this is to accelerate economic activity and employment.

The Bill defines factory and any premises where the manufacturing process is carried out and it employs more than:

  1. 20 workers for premises where the manufacturing process is carried out using power, and
  2. 40 workers for premises where it is carried out without using power.

Any place where hazardous is carried out is defined as Establishments engaged in Hazardous Activity irrespective of the number of workers

It also restricts contract labor employment for core activities, except in the following cases:

  1. The normal functioning of the establishment is such that the activity is ordinarily done through a contractor
  2. The activities are such that they do not require full-time workers for the major portion of the day, or,
  3. There is a sudden increase in the volume work in the core activity which needs to be completed in a specified time.

It has specified 8 hours in a day to be the daily work hour limit.

According to the Bill, all industrial establishment with 300 workers or more have to draft standing orders regarding the matters that are enlisted in a Schedule to the Code, such

  1. Classification of workers
  2. Manner of informing workers about work hours, holidays, paydays, and wage rates
  3. Termination of employment

The new bill has altered the earlier provision which stated that where once an establishment is covered under the provisions related to standing orders, these provisions continued to apply even if its employees strength reduced below the threshold (100 workers) at any time thereafter.

It also provided that any establishment which has at 300 workers is mandated to take prior permission of the government before they commit the acts of closure, lay-off, or retrenchment.

The 2020 Bill has amended the definitions of some terms in the Code. Some of these important amendments are enumerated below:

  1. The definition of employee has been expanded to include workers employed through contractors
  2. The definition of inter-state migrant workers has been expanded to include self-employed workers from another state
  3. The definition of platform worker has been expanded to additional categories of services or activities as may be notified by the government

The Bill also provides that the central government is empowered to apply the Code to any establishment through the way of notice. 

 

 [READ LABOUR CODES]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-sets-aside-ngt-order-for-temple-demolition-holds-tribunal-has-no-jurisdiction-over-encroachments-under-municipal-laws
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets Aside NGT Order for Temple Demolition; Holds Tribunal Has No Jurisdiction Over Encroachments Under Municipal Laws [Read Order]

Supreme Court sets aside NGT order to demolish Ghaziabad temple, ruling tribunal lacks jurisdiction over encroachments under municipal laws.

18 March, 2026 10:41 AM
meghalaya-hc-quashes-ghadc-order-making-st-certificate-mandatory-for-election-nominations
Trending Judiciary
Meghalaya HC Quashes GHADC Order Making ST Certificate Mandatory for Election Nominations [Read Order]

Meghalaya HC quashes GHADC notification mandating ST certificate for poll nominations, cites lack of Governor approval and due process.

18 March, 2026 03:51 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-dismisses-mcgms-challenge-to-arbitral-award-holds-conduct-of-party-relevant-to-decide-jurisdictional-challenge
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses MCGM’s Challenge to Arbitral Award, Holds Conduct of Party Relevant to Decide Jurisdictional Challenge [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court dismisses MCGM’s challenge to arbitral award, holds party conduct relevant while deciding jurisdictional objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act.

13 March, 2026 12:31 PM
sc-pulls-up-railways-over-safety-measures-seeks-detailed-affidavit-on-fund-allocation-and-travel-insurance-disparity
Trending Judiciary
SC Pulls Up Railways Over Safety Measures, Seeks Detailed Affidavit on Fund Allocation and Travel Insurance Disparity [Read Order]

Supreme Court pulls up Railways over slow safety progress, seeks detailed affidavit on fund allocation and says counter ticket passengers cannot be denied travel insurance.

13 March, 2026 02:04 PM
madras-hc-acquits-woman-in-husbands-murder-case-says-section-106-evidence-act-cannot-replace-prosecutions-burden-of-proof
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Acquits Woman in Husband’s Murder Case; Says Section 106 Evidence Act Cannot Replace Prosecution’s Burden of Proof [Read Judgment]

Madras High Court acquits woman in husband’s murder case, holding Section 106 of the Evidence Act cannot substitute the prosecution’s primary burden of proof.

13 March, 2026 02:11 PM
allahabad-hc-lists-waseem-rizvis-pil-challenging-functioning-and-composition-of-up-sunni-central-waqf-board-after-four-weeks
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Lists Waseem Rizvi’s PIL Challenging Functioning and Composition of UP Sunni Central Waqf Board After Four Weeks [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court lists Waseem Rizvi’s PIL challenging the functioning and composition of the UP Sunni Central Waqf Board; Court seeks further hearing on key contention.

14 March, 2026 12:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email