38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, May 17, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

In computing period of of limitation for any suit, the period from 15.03.2020 till 02.10.2021 shall stand excluded: Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trademarks reiterates SC order via public notice [READ NOTICE]

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      12 October, 2021 07:46 PM      0 Comments
 In computing period of of limitation for any suit, the period from 15.03.2020 till 02.10.2021 shall stand excluded: Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trademarks reiterates SC order via public notice [READ NOTICE]

The Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trademarks for the Office of CGPDTM, Mumbai, recently observed via public notice the Supreme Courts order regarding the computation of the period of limitation for suits which stated that in computing period of limitation for any suit, the period from 15.03.2020 till 02.10.2021 shall stand excluded.

The Apex Court had previously extended the period of limitation prescribed under the general law or special laws with effect from 15 March 2020 till further orders. However, it later made specific observations and noted that only the period from 15 March 2020 till 2 October 2021 shall stand excluded and consequently, the balance period of limitation remaining as on 15.03.2021, if any, shall become available with effect from 03.10.2021.

The above observations were made while hearing an application by the Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association (SCAORA) demanding for the dated 23 March 2020 to be restored. An order to that effect was passed 23 September 2021.

Background:

The Apex Court, in the matter of Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020 had previously extended the period of limitation prescribed under the general law or special laws with effect from 15 March 2020 via an order dated 23 March 2020. 

Keeping in mind the situation arising on account of Covid-19 and the resultant difficulties that may be faced by litigants across the country in filing their petitions and suits within the period of limitation the court had noted that a period of limitation in all such proceedings shall stand extended w.e.f. 15 March 2020 till further order/s to be passed by it. 

The stand was however, modified by the Supreme Court via its order dated 8 March 2021 which stated:

In computing the period of limitation for any suit, appeal, application or proceeding, the period from 15 March 2020 till 14 March 2021 shall stand excluded. Consequently, the balance period of limitation remaining as on 15.03.2020, if any, shall become available with effect from 15 March 2021.

The Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association (SCAORA) however intervened in the Suo Motu proceedings by filing Miscellaneous Application No.665 of 2021 seeking restoration of the order dated 23 March 2020.

However, the court rejected the application by stating the follows: The order dated 23 March 2020 was passed in view of the extraordinary health crisis. On 08 March 2021, the order dated 23 March 2020 was brought to an end, permitting the relaxation of period of limitation between 15 March 2020 and 14 March 2021. While doing so, it was made clear that the period of limitation would start from 15.03.2021. As the said order dated 8 March 2021 was only a one-time measure, in view of the pandemic, we are not inclined to modify the conditions contained in the order dated 8 March 2021.

Courts Observations:

In dismissing the application for seeking restoration of the order dated 23 March 2020, the Court noted, the following: 

  1. In computing the period of limitation for any suit, appeal, application or proceeding, the period from 15 March 2020 till 02 October 2021 shall stand excluded. Consequently, the balance period of limitation remaining as on 15 March 2020, if any, shall become available with effect from 03 October 2021.
  2. In cases where the limitation would have expired during the period between 15 March 2020 till 02 October 2021, notwithstanding the actual balance period of limitation remaining, all persons shall have a limitation period of 90 days from 03 October 2021. In the event the actual balance period of limitation remaining, with effect from 03 October 2021, is greater than 90 days, that longer period shall apply.
  3. The period from 15 March 2020 till 02 October 2021 shall also stand excluded in computing the periods prescribed under Sections 23 (4) and 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and provisos (b) and (c) of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and any other laws, which prescribe period(s) of limitation for instituting proceedings, outer limits (within which the court or tribunal can condone delay) and termination of proceedings.

It is accordingly notified to all the stakeholders that period of limitation shall be computed in accordance with the afore-cited order dated 23 September 2021 passed by the Honble Supreme Court of India, it was further noted by the Office of CGPDTM, Mumbai Govt. of India via its public notice.

 

 [READ NOTICE]



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

senior-citizens-act-must-be-liberally-construed-rajasthan-hc-upholds-eviction-of-son-and-daughter-in-law
Trending Judiciary
Senior Citizens Act Must Be Liberally Construed: Rajasthan HC Upholds Eviction of Son and Daughter-in-Law [Read Judgment]

Rajasthan HC upheld the eviction of a son and daughter-in-law under the Senior Citizens Act, stressing protection and dignity of elderly parents.

16 May, 2026 01:54 PM
allahabad-hc-grants-bail-to-eight-accused-in-ganga-boat-iftar-case
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Grants Bail to Eight Accused in Ganga Boat Iftar Case

Allahabad High Court grants bail to eight accused in the Varanasi Ganga boat iftar case; pleas of remaining accused still pending.

16 May, 2026 02:01 PM

TOP STORIES

the-faustian-bargain-judicial-paternalism-legislative-silence-and-the-crisis-of-masculinity-in-indian-matrimonial-law
Trending Vantage Points
The Faustian Bargain: Judicial Paternalism, Legislative Silence, and the Crisis of Masculinity in Indian Matrimonial Law

Senior Advocate Mahalakshmi Pavani critically examines Indian matrimonial law, judicial paternalism, and gender bias, calling for gender-neutral domestic violence laws and equal constitutional protection for men and women alike.

11 May, 2026 11:07 AM
sc-refuses-to-hear-pleas-against-aor-exam-2026-cancellation
Trending Judiciary
SC Refuses To Hear Pleas Against AOR Exam 2026 Cancellation

Supreme Court refuses to hear pleas against cancellation of AOR Exam 2026 and asks aggrieved lawyers to submit representation to the CJI.

11 May, 2026 02:22 PM
calcutta-hc-quashes-arbitral-award-against-tata-steel-over-invalid-tribunal
Trending Business
Calcutta HC Quashes Arbitral Award Against Tata Steel Over Invalid Tribunal [Read Order]

Calcutta High Court sets aside arbitral award against Tata Steel, holding participation cannot validate an illegally constituted tribunal.

11 May, 2026 02:33 PM
ed-opposes-jacqueline-fernandezs-plea-to-become-approver-in-sukesh-chandrashekhar-rs-200-crore-money-laundering-case
Trending CelebStreet
ED Opposes Jacqueline Fernandez’s Plea to Become Approver in Sukesh Chandrashekhar Rs 200 Crore Money Laundering Case

ED opposes Jacqueline Fernandez’s approver plea in the Sukesh Chandrashekhar Rs 200 crore money laundering case, calls her an active participant.

11 May, 2026 04:42 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email