38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, February 20, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

Jammu And Kashmir Residents Approach Supreme Court Challenging Delimitation Exercise In The Union Territory

By LawStreet News Network      30 March, 2022 03:07 AM      0 Comments
Jammu And Kashmir Residents Approach Supreme Court

Two residents of the Union Territory  of Jammu and Kashmir have moved the Supreme Court to challenge the directions of the Central Government given in March 2020 for appointing the delimitation commission to redraw Lok Sabha and assembly constituencies of the Union Territory Jammu and Kashmir.

BACKGROUND 

Delimitation is the an essential process for election through which boundaries of Lok Sabha and state assembly seats are redrawn in order to represent the actual changes in the population. This process needs to be conducted before the elections are held so that the population can be properly represented in the elections. 

CONTENTIONS OF THE PLAINTIFF 

The plea has been filed through M/S LAWFIC and it has been drafted by Senior Advocate Ravi Shankar Jandhyala.

Haji Abdul Gani Khan and Dr. Mohammad Ayub Mattoo have filed a petition seeking a ruling that the Delimitation Commission's constitution is invalid.
Importantly, the plea questions as to when Art. 170 of the Constitution of India provides that the next delimitation in the country will be taken up after 2026, then why UT of Jammu and Kashmir had been singled out. In this regard, the plea further argues that any move to increase the number of seats in Jammu and Kashmir must be preceded by a Constitutional Amendment, besides the amendment of Elections Laws, namely, the Delimitation Act, 2002 and the Representation of People Act, 1950. 

NOTIFICATION OF THE GOVERNMENT 

the Union Government had issued a notification on March 6, 2020, in the exercise of power under section 3 of the Delimitation Act, 2002, constituting a Delimitation Commission, with Justice (Retd) Ranjana Prakash Desai as Chairperson, for the purpose of delimitation of Assembly and Parliamentary constituencies in the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir and the state of Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, and Nagaland, for a period of one year.

In another notification  issued on March 3, 2021 the term of the Delimitation Commission was extended by one year and omitted the names of the four states, and limited the scope of delimitation exercise to only UT of Jammu and Kashmir. 

ULTRA VIRES ACT 

The plea also claims that the increase in the number of seats in the Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir from 107 to 114 (including 24 seats in Pakistan Occupied Kashmir) as provided in the J&K Reorganisation Act, 2019, is in violation of constitutional provisions such as Articles 81, 82, 170, 330, and 332, as well as statutory provisions such as Section 63 of the Jammu & Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019.

OMMISSION OF CERTAIN STATES 

The petitioners claim that the Central Government's decision to form the Delimitation Commission to take up delimitation in the UT of J&K and the states of Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, and Nagaland violates Art 14 because the Government's order mentions two distinct population ratios. 

The plea also claims that the Central Government's order of March 3, 2021, excluding the states of Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, and Nagaland from the delimitation process and deciding to conduct delimitation only for the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir is unconstitutional because it amounts to classification.

DUTY OF ELECTION COMMISSION 

The plea also states that it is only the Election Commission that must carry out the process of delimitation (for necessary updation) after the Parliamentary and Assembly Constituencies Delimitation Order, 2008 is notified.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

homoeopathy-practitioner-cannot-prescribe-allopathy-medicines-telangana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Homoeopathy Practitioner Cannot Prescribe Allopathy Medicines: Telangana HC [Read Order]

Supreme Court holds homoeopathy practitioners cannot prescribe allopathy drugs; Telangana HC quashes FIR on procedural lapse under NMCA.

20 February, 2026 11:28 AM
contractual-bar-on-interest-claims-overrides-interest-act-kerala-high-court-order-set-aside-sc
Trending Judiciary
Contractual Bar on Interest Claims Overrides Interest Act; Kerala High Court Order Set Aside: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that contractual clauses barring interest claims override the Interest Act, setting aside Kerala High Court’s order on delayed payments.

20 February, 2026 11:43 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-invokes-article-142-to-ensure-functioning-of-consumer-commissions-in-smaller-states-seeks-sgs-assistance
Trending Judiciary
SC Invokes Article 142 To Ensure Functioning Of Consumer Commissions In Smaller States, Seeks SG’s Assistance [Read Order]

Supreme Court invokes Article 142 to ensure consumer commissions function in smaller states, directs High Court judges to hear pending cases.

14 February, 2026 03:34 PM
madras-hc-upholds-life-sentence-for-church-pastor-convicted-of-sexual-assault-on-minor-with-disability
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Upholds Life Sentence for Church Pastor Convicted of Sexual Assault on Minor with Disability [Read Judgment]

Madras High Court upholds life sentence of church pastor convicted under POCSO for sexually assaulting a 17-year-old girl with intellectual disability.

14 February, 2026 04:40 PM
sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-over-alleged-anti-muslim-remarks-by-assam-cm-says-approach-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines to Entertain Plea Over Alleged Anti-Muslim Remarks by Assam CM, Says Approach HC

Supreme Court asks petitioners to approach Gauhati High Court over alleged hate speech by Assam CM, declines plea for FIRs and SIT probe.

16 February, 2026 02:52 PM
can-live-in-partner-be-prosecuted-under-section-498a-ipc-sc-to-decide-scope-of-husband-in-cruelty-law
Trending Judiciary
Can Live-In Partner Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC? SC To Decide Scope Of ‘Husband’ In Cruelty Law [Read Order]

Supreme Court to decide if a man in a live-in relationship can be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC for cruelty. Case to impact scope of “husband”.

16 February, 2026 03:33 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email