38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, April 25, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

Jammu And Kashmir Residents Approach Supreme Court Challenging Delimitation Exercise In The Union Territory

By LawStreet News Network      30 March, 2022 03:07 AM      0 Comments
Jammu And Kashmir Residents Approach Supreme Court

Two residents of the Union Territory  of Jammu and Kashmir have moved the Supreme Court to challenge the directions of the Central Government given in March 2020 for appointing the delimitation commission to redraw Lok Sabha and assembly constituencies of the Union Territory Jammu and Kashmir.

BACKGROUND 

Delimitation is the an essential process for election through which boundaries of Lok Sabha and state assembly seats are redrawn in order to represent the actual changes in the population. This process needs to be conducted before the elections are held so that the population can be properly represented in the elections. 

CONTENTIONS OF THE PLAINTIFF 

The plea has been filed through M/S LAWFIC and it has been drafted by Senior Advocate Ravi Shankar Jandhyala.

Haji Abdul Gani Khan and Dr. Mohammad Ayub Mattoo have filed a petition seeking a ruling that the Delimitation Commission's constitution is invalid.
Importantly, the plea questions as to when Art. 170 of the Constitution of India provides that the next delimitation in the country will be taken up after 2026, then why UT of Jammu and Kashmir had been singled out. In this regard, the plea further argues that any move to increase the number of seats in Jammu and Kashmir must be preceded by a Constitutional Amendment, besides the amendment of Elections Laws, namely, the Delimitation Act, 2002 and the Representation of People Act, 1950. 

NOTIFICATION OF THE GOVERNMENT 

the Union Government had issued a notification on March 6, 2020, in the exercise of power under section 3 of the Delimitation Act, 2002, constituting a Delimitation Commission, with Justice (Retd) Ranjana Prakash Desai as Chairperson, for the purpose of delimitation of Assembly and Parliamentary constituencies in the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir and the state of Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, and Nagaland, for a period of one year.

In another notification  issued on March 3, 2021 the term of the Delimitation Commission was extended by one year and omitted the names of the four states, and limited the scope of delimitation exercise to only UT of Jammu and Kashmir. 

ULTRA VIRES ACT 

The plea also claims that the increase in the number of seats in the Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir from 107 to 114 (including 24 seats in Pakistan Occupied Kashmir) as provided in the J&K Reorganisation Act, 2019, is in violation of constitutional provisions such as Articles 81, 82, 170, 330, and 332, as well as statutory provisions such as Section 63 of the Jammu & Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019.

OMMISSION OF CERTAIN STATES 

The petitioners claim that the Central Government's decision to form the Delimitation Commission to take up delimitation in the UT of J&K and the states of Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, and Nagaland violates Art 14 because the Government's order mentions two distinct population ratios. 

The plea also claims that the Central Government's order of March 3, 2021, excluding the states of Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, and Nagaland from the delimitation process and deciding to conduct delimitation only for the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir is unconstitutional because it amounts to classification.

DUTY OF ELECTION COMMISSION 

The plea also states that it is only the Election Commission that must carry out the process of delimitation (for necessary updation) after the Parliamentary and Assembly Constituencies Delimitation Order, 2008 is notified.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

madras-hc-directs-tahsildar-to-issues-no-caste-no-religion-certificate-to-cine-actor-r-partibhan
Trending CelebStreet
Madras HC Directs Tahsildar To Issues “No Caste No Religion” Certificate To Cine Actor R. Partibhan [Read Order]

Madras High Court directs Tahsildar to issue “No Caste No Religion” certificate to actor R. Parthiban, citing delay and earlier Division Bench precedent.

24 April, 2026 05:54 PM
ngt-halts-omaxes-dwarka-sports-arena-over-illegal-tree-felling-and-missing-environmental-clearance
Trending Environment
NGT Halts Omaxe’s Dwarka Sports Arena Over Illegal Tree Felling and Missing Environmental Clearance [Read Order]

NGT halts Omaxe’s Dwarka project over illegal tree felling and lack of environmental clearance, rejecting the developer’s “deemed EC” defence.

24 April, 2026 06:00 PM

TOP STORIES

transgender-rights-in-india-at-a-crossroads-progress-or-regression
Trending Vantage Points
Transgender Rights in India at a Crossroads: Progress or Regression?

India’s 2026 Transgender Law Amendment Sparks Debate: Progress or Rollback? Concerns rise over loss of self-identification and increased medical control.

20 April, 2026 02:00 PM
delhi-hc-pronounces-judgment-on-kejriwals-recusal-plea-against-justice-swarna-kanta-sharma-in-liquor-policy-case
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Pronounces Judgment on Kejriwal’s Recusal Plea Against Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma in Liquor Policy Case

Delhi High Court rejects Kejriwal’s recusal plea, holding allegations of bias against Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma insufficient in liquor policy case.

21 April, 2026 11:16 AM
sc-dismisses-umar-khalids-review-petition-against-judgment-denying-bail-in-delhi-riots-larger-conspiracy-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses Umar Khalid’s Review Petition Against Judgment Denying Bail in Delhi Riots Larger Conspiracy Case [Read Order]

Supreme Court dismisses Umar Khalid’s review plea against bail denial in Delhi riots conspiracy case, finding no grounds to interfere with its earlier judgment.

21 April, 2026 11:58 AM
nashik-court-denies-interim-arrest-protection-to-nida-ejaz-khan-in-tcs-bpo-harassment-case-bail-hearing-set-for-april-27
Trending Crime, Police And Law
Nashik Court Denies Interim Arrest Protection to Nida Ejaz Khan in TCS BPO Harassment Case; Bail Hearing Set for April 27

Nashik Court denies interim arrest protection to Nida Ejaz Khan in TCS BPO harassment case; anticipatory bail hearing adjourned to April 27.

21 April, 2026 01:37 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email