38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, December 18, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

Jammu And Kashmir Residents Approach Supreme Court Challenging Delimitation Exercise In The Union Territory

By LawStreet News Network      30 March, 2022 03:07 AM      0 Comments
Jammu And Kashmir Residents Approach Supreme Court

Two residents of the Union Territory  of Jammu and Kashmir have moved the Supreme Court to challenge the directions of the Central Government given in March 2020 for appointing the delimitation commission to redraw Lok Sabha and assembly constituencies of the Union Territory Jammu and Kashmir.

BACKGROUND 

Delimitation is the an essential process for election through which boundaries of Lok Sabha and state assembly seats are redrawn in order to represent the actual changes in the population. This process needs to be conducted before the elections are held so that the population can be properly represented in the elections. 

CONTENTIONS OF THE PLAINTIFF 

The plea has been filed through M/S LAWFIC and it has been drafted by Senior Advocate Ravi Shankar Jandhyala.

Haji Abdul Gani Khan and Dr. Mohammad Ayub Mattoo have filed a petition seeking a ruling that the Delimitation Commission's constitution is invalid.
Importantly, the plea questions as to when Art. 170 of the Constitution of India provides that the next delimitation in the country will be taken up after 2026, then why UT of Jammu and Kashmir had been singled out. In this regard, the plea further argues that any move to increase the number of seats in Jammu and Kashmir must be preceded by a Constitutional Amendment, besides the amendment of Elections Laws, namely, the Delimitation Act, 2002 and the Representation of People Act, 1950. 

NOTIFICATION OF THE GOVERNMENT 

the Union Government had issued a notification on March 6, 2020, in the exercise of power under section 3 of the Delimitation Act, 2002, constituting a Delimitation Commission, with Justice (Retd) Ranjana Prakash Desai as Chairperson, for the purpose of delimitation of Assembly and Parliamentary constituencies in the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir and the state of Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, and Nagaland, for a period of one year.

In another notification  issued on March 3, 2021 the term of the Delimitation Commission was extended by one year and omitted the names of the four states, and limited the scope of delimitation exercise to only UT of Jammu and Kashmir. 

ULTRA VIRES ACT 

The plea also claims that the increase in the number of seats in the Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir from 107 to 114 (including 24 seats in Pakistan Occupied Kashmir) as provided in the J&K Reorganisation Act, 2019, is in violation of constitutional provisions such as Articles 81, 82, 170, 330, and 332, as well as statutory provisions such as Section 63 of the Jammu & Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019.

OMMISSION OF CERTAIN STATES 

The petitioners claim that the Central Government's decision to form the Delimitation Commission to take up delimitation in the UT of J&K and the states of Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, and Nagaland violates Art 14 because the Government's order mentions two distinct population ratios. 

The plea also claims that the Central Government's order of March 3, 2021, excluding the states of Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, and Nagaland from the delimitation process and deciding to conduct delimitation only for the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir is unconstitutional because it amounts to classification.

DUTY OF ELECTION COMMISSION 

The plea also states that it is only the Election Commission that must carry out the process of delimitation (for necessary updation) after the Parliamentary and Assembly Constituencies Delimitation Order, 2008 is notified.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

madras-hc-invokes-ancient-rajadharma-and-kautilyas-arthashastra-govt-has-constitutional-duty-to-provide-legal-aid-to-indian-citizens-abroad
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Invokes Ancient ‘Rajadharma’ and Kautilya’s Arthashastra: Govt Has Constitutional Duty to Provide Legal Aid to Indian Citizens Abroad [Read Order]

Madras High Court invokes Rajadharma and Arthashastra, holds India has a constitutional duty to provide legal aid to citizens facing disputes abroad.

17 December, 2025 06:25 PM
sc-flags-exploitation-of-deity-criticises-paid-special-pujas-at-bankey-bihari-temple
Trending Judiciary
SC Flags ‘Exploitation’ of Deity, Criticises Paid ‘Special Pujas’ at Bankey Bihari Temple

Supreme Court flags exploitation of deity, questions paid special pujas at Bankey Bihari Temple, citing inequality and violation of sacred resting hours.

17 December, 2025 06:36 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-orders-aiims-to-form-secondary-medical-board-to-evaluate-passive-euthanasia-for-man-in-vegetative-state-for-13-years
Trending Judiciary
SC Orders AIIMS to Form Secondary Medical Board to Evaluate Passive Euthanasia for Man in Vegetative State for 13 Years [Read Order]

Supreme Court directs AIIMS to form a Secondary Medical Board to assess passive euthanasia for a man in a vegetative state for 13 years.

13 December, 2025 06:00 PM
endless-compassion-not-permissible-sc-bars-claims-for-higher-post-after-compassionate-appointment
Trending Judiciary
‘Endless Compassion Not Permissible’: SC Bars Claims for Higher Post After Compassionate Appointment [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that employees cannot seek higher posts after accepting compassionate appointment, calling such claims “endless compassion.”

13 December, 2025 06:54 PM
property-tax-appeal-only-tax-amount-payable-penal-interest-not-mandatory-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Property Tax Appeal: Only Tax Amount Payable, Penal Interest Not Mandatory: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules that municipalities cannot insist on penal interest for entertaining tax appeals; only the tax amount under Section 509(11) is required.

13 December, 2025 07:09 PM
sc-expands-ambit-of-posh-act-restrictive-interpretation-would-undermine-remedial-intent
Trending Judiciary
SC Expands Ambit of POSH Act: “Restrictive Interpretation Would Undermine Remedial Intent” [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules ICC at aggrieved woman’s workplace has jurisdiction under POSH Act, rejecting restrictive interpretation and reinforcing women’s right to safety.

13 December, 2025 07:13 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email