38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, December 28, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

Maharashtra AG Ashutosh Kumbhakoni alleges that Then Government Led by Devendra Fernandez asked me not Appear in Maharashtra Reservation Case

By Neha Bharti      14 September, 2020 03:20 PM      0 Comments
Maratha Reservation Case Ashutosh Kumbhakoni

A Former Standing Counsel alleged that Maharashtra Advocate General Ashutosh Kumbhakoni was responsible for the Supreme Court verdict on Wednesday i.e. September 9, 2020, against the Maratha reservation. The Supreme Court stays Maratha reservation for government jobs and academic admissions for 2020-21 not in excess of 50%. Advocate General shifts his blame to BJP Government that they did not want him to argue the case. 

On September 9, 2020, a three-judge bench comprising of Justice L Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta, and S Ravindra Bhat held that the Maharashtra government has not shown any extraordinary situation for providing reservation to Marathi in excess of 50%. 

The court said that it would be difficult to cancel admission is made on appointment done for the jobs under the reservation therefore they 

had referred a batch of petitions which challenges the Maharashtra State Reservation For Socially and Educationally Backward Classes Act which provides for reservation in employment and education to the Maharashtra community, to a larger bench. 

Not long after the judgment was passed, the former Standing Counsel Nishant Katneshwarkar alleged that AG Kumbhakoni has not fulfilled his duty as he has not argued for the state even once either in the Bombay High Court or Supreme Court.

"The hearing of the Bombay High Court started in February 2019 before the hearing in January 2019 the Maratha group of people had a meeting in Kolhapur where a decision was taken that former Advocate General V A Thorat should appear in the case. Post the meeting with than government asked me to let Mr. V A Thorat thought to defend the state legislation. Hence, with due respect to the request, I did not appear in the case" this was said by Advocate General Ashutosh Kumbhakoni. V A Thorat was asked to appear in the Maratha reservation case reason behind it was that he was Maratha by caste and Advocate General Ashutosh Kumbhakoni was not. 

According to some of the sources close to the Advocate General's office speculated that why Nishant Katneshwarkar is blaming Ashutosh Kumbhakoni for the judgment as he is no longer the standing counsel. He also while blaming Ashutosh Kumbhakoni states that the verdict was "shocking" for the people of Maharashtra. 

Ashutosh Kumbhakoni was praised by the CM Devendra Fernandez when the Bombay High Court has upheld the SEBC Act, 2018. 

Firstly, in 2017 Ashutosh Kumbhakoni was appointed as Advocate General by then Government led by Bjp-Shiv Sena. He was reappointed as advocate general after the new government came into power which is an alliance of Shiv Sena-Congress- NCP.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

kerala-hc-strikes-down-bail-condition-directing-foreign-national-to-remain-in-detention-centre-holds-it-violates-article-21
Trending Judiciary
Kerala HC Strikes Down Bail Condition Directing Foreign National To Remain In Detention Centre, Holds It Violates Article 21 [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court quashes bail condition forcing a foreign national to stay in a detention centre, holding it violates Article 21 and defeats the purpose of bail.

27 December, 2025 02:02 AM
noida-court-rejects-uttar-pradesh-govts-application-to-withdraw-prosecution-in-2015-akhlaq-lynching-case-orders-expeditious-trial
Trending Judiciary
Noida Court Rejects Uttar Pradesh Govt’s Application To Withdraw Prosecution In 2015 Akhlaq Lynching Case, Orders Expeditious Trial

Noida court rejects UP government’s plea to withdraw prosecution in the 2015 Akhlaq lynching case, orders day-to-day trial citing gravity of offence.

27 December, 2025 06:10 PM

TOP STORIES

madras-hc-calls-for-audit-of-fees-paid-to-law-officers-criticises-exorbitant-payments-and-unnecessary-appearances-by-additional-advocate-generals
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Calls for Audit of Fees Paid to Law Officers; Criticises Exorbitant Payments and Unnecessary Appearances by Additional Advocate Generals [Read Order]

Madras High Court calls for audit of fees paid to law officers, flags exorbitant payments and unnecessary appearances by Additional Advocate Generals.

22 December, 2025 08:56 PM
child-born-within-four-months-of-marriage-entitled-to-inheritance-sec-112-of-evidence-act-raises-conclusive-presumption-of-legitimacy-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Born Within Four Months Of Marriage Entitled To Inheritance; Sec 112 of Evidence Act Raises Conclusive Presumption of Legitimacy: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that a child born within four months of marriage is legitimate and entitled to inheritance under Section 112 of the Evidence Act.

22 December, 2025 09:07 PM
delhi-hc-stays-cbi-summons-to-advocate-sachin-bajpai-says-lawyers-cannot-be-treated-as-suspects-for-discharging-professional-duties
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Stays CBI Summons to Advocate Sachin Bajpai, Says Lawyers Cannot Be Treated as Suspects for Discharging Professional Duties [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court stays CBI summons to advocate Sachin Bajpai, holding lawyers cannot be treated as suspects for acts done in professional duty.

22 December, 2025 10:52 PM
sc-quashes-498a-cruelty-fir-against-husband-says-vague-allegations-dont-make-out-criminal-offence
Trending Judiciary
SC Quashes 498A Cruelty FIR Against Husband, Says Vague Allegations Don’t Make Out Criminal Offence [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court quashes 498A cruelty FIR against husband, holding vague allegations reflect normal marital wear and tear and don’t justify criminal trial.

22 December, 2025 11:13 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email