38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, April 01, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Allahabad High Court Stays Suspension of Cop Accused of Extramarital Relationship [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      16 May, 2025 05:41 PM      0 Comments
Allahabad High Court Stays Suspension of Cop Accused of Extramarital Relationship

Allahabad: The Allahabad High Court has delivered a significant order staying the suspension of a police official accused of maintaining a relationship with another woman while being legally married.

Justice Karunesh Singh Pawar issued the stay on the suspension order of Mohammad Mohsin Khan, noting important legal considerations regarding misconduct allegations and procedural requirements.

The court was hearing a writ petition filed by Mohammad Mohsin Khan challenging his suspension order. The petitioner argued that “the impugned suspension order has been passed mechanically by the State Government solely on the basis of the recommendation dated 06.03.2025 of the Additional Director General of Police, without any independent application of mind.”

A key contention raised by the petitioner was that “being in a sexual relationship with another woman despite being married does not constitute misconduct.” The petitioner’s counsel pointed out that while Rule 29(1) of the U.P. Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1956 deems entering into a second marriage during the subsistence of the first as misconduct, merely maintaining a relationship with another woman while still legally married does not amount to misconduct.

The court noted that an FIR (No. 570/2024) under Section 69 of the BNS had previously been lodged against the petitioner, which he had challenged through Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 23395 of 2024. A Division Bench had already stayed the filing of the charge sheet in that matter on 19.12.2024.

After considering Rule 29(1) of the U.P. Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1956, and relevant precedents, including the judgments in V.N. Daipuria vs. State of U.P. and Others and Shahjahan Khan vs. State of U.P. and Others, the court decided to stay the operation of the suspension order until further notice.

The court directed the Standing Counsel to file a counter affidavit within four weeks and allowed the State to file a rejoinder affidavit within two weeks thereafter.

The case is scheduled to be heard next on 28.07.2025.

Case Title: Mohammad Mohsin Khan vs. State of U.P. Through Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Lucknow and 3 Others.

[Read Order] 



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a law graduate from The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has a keen ...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

"No Loudspeakers For Azan, No Fundamental Right To Create Noise," Says Allahabad HC To Two Mosques [Read Judgment] "No Loudspeakers For Azan, No Fundamental Right To Create Noise," Says Allahabad HC To Two Mosques [Read Judgment]

Further reasoning of the court was based on consideration of the fact that a mixed population resides in that area, comprising Hindus and Muslims both, which lead to the tension between both the groups regarding the use of loudspeakers.

Allahabad High Court to Hear Ghazipur MPs Plea against Ban on Azaan Allahabad High Court to Hear Ghazipur MPs Plea against Ban on Azaan

Hence, although an ongoing religious practice, the use of loudspeakers in the performance of Azaan remains a debatable question.

There is NO minority in India currently: Former Justice SN Srivastava, Allahabad HC There is NO minority in India currently: Former Justice SN Srivastava, Allahabad HC

"Explore former Justice SN Srivastava's statement on the minority status in India, as he discusses the evolving dynamics of religious and cultural representation in the country.

TRENDING NEWS

calcutta-hc-dismisses-pil-challenging-ecis-mass-transfer-of-officers-in-west-bengal
Trending Judiciary
Calcutta HC Dismisses PIL Challenging ECI’s Mass Transfer of Officers in West Bengal [Read Judgment]

Calcutta High Court dismisses PIL challenging ECI’s mass transfer of officers in West Bengal, upholding its powers under Article 324.

31 March, 2026 05:49 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-reverses-high-court-acquittal-in-child-rape-case-directs-all-high-courts-to-strictly-follow-ban-on-disclosure-of-victims-identity
Trending Judiciary
SC Reverses High Court Acquittal In Child Rape Case; Directs All High Courts To Strictly Follow Ban On Disclosure Of Victim’s Identity [Read Judgment]

SC restores conviction in child rape case, reverses acquittal, and directs strict compliance with law prohibiting disclosure of victim identity.

26 March, 2026 02:05 PM
allahabad-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-swami-avimukteshwaranand-saraswati-in-pocso-case-rules-section-29-presumption-not-applicable-at-pre-arrest-stage
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati in POCSO Case, Rules Section 29 Presumption Not Applicable at Pre-Arrest Stage [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants anticipatory bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati, rules Section 29 POCSO presumption not applicable at pre-arrest stage.

26 March, 2026 02:25 PM
karnataka-hc-quashes-fir-against-sri-sri-ravi-shankar-in-bengaluru-land-encroachment-case
Trending Judiciary
Karnataka HC Quashes FIR Against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar In Bengaluru Land Encroachment Case

Karnataka HC quashes FIR against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar in Bengaluru land encroachment case, holding no direct role and limiting relief to him alone.

26 March, 2026 03:00 PM
sc-dismisses-challenge-to-mha-circular-on-vande-mataram-terms-apprehensions-premature
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses Challenge to MHA Circular on ‘Vande Mataram’; Terms Apprehensions Premature

Supreme Court dismisses plea against MHA’s ‘Vande Mataram’ circular, calls concerns premature as directive is advisory with no mandatory or penal effect.

26 March, 2026 04:46 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email