38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, August 17, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Consumer Court orders IRCTC to pay compensation in executive lounge service complaint [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      28 November, 2024 11:18 PM      0 Comments
Consumer Court orders IRCTC to pay compensation in executive lounge service complaint

Himachal: The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (DCDRC) in Dharamshala, Himachal Pradesh, has delivered a significant judgment against the Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation Limited (IRCTC) and its licensed contractor for providing poor service at an Executive Lounge in New Delhi Railway Station.

A coram of DCDRC President Hemanshu Mishra, along with members Narayan Thakur and Arti Sood, addressed the case filed by Tarun Chaurasia, who complained about inadequate facilities at the IRCTC Executive Lounge on Platform No. 16.

The court noted: “The complainant encountered significant deficiencies in the Executive Lounge services, including extremely poor restroom conditions, non-functional television and information displays, and the complete absence of reading materials.”

Upon examining the digital evidence submitted, the commission found substantial proof of service deficiencies. The contractor had failed to maintain the lounge in accordance with the contract’s stipulated standards of cleanliness and amenities.

The court further observed: “The public amenities in the Executive Lounge depict the image of the nation and its establishments, and facilities must never fall below minimum standards.”

In conclusion, the court determined that the complainant suffered mental agony and harassment due to IRCTC’s and the contractor’s failure to maintain the lounge. It issued the following directions:
• Opposite Party No. 2 (contractor) to pay ₹10,000 as compensation
• Opposite Party No. 1 (IRCTC) to pay ₹5,000 as compensation
• Joint litigation costs of ₹7,500
• Repair of washroom facilities within 30 days
• Deposit of ₹20,000 in the District Consumer Legal Aid Fund

Advocate Aashima Kalra appeared for the complainant, while Advocate Vipan Kumar represented IRCTC.

Case Title: Tarun Chaurasia v. Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd and Another

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a final-year law student at The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Court orders Zomato to pay Rs 60000 for not delivering Rs 130 Momos Court orders Zomato to pay Rs 60000 for not delivering Rs 130 Momos

Court orders Zomato to pay Rs 60,000 for not delivering a Rs 130 momos order, highlighting the importance of timely customer grievance resolution.

Consumer Court orders IRCTC to pay compensation in executive lounge service complaint [Read Order] Consumer Court orders IRCTC to pay compensation in executive lounge service complaint [Read Order]

Consumer court orders IRCTC and contractor to pay ₹35,000 for poor Executive Lounge services at New Delhi Railway Station, citing major deficiencies.

Delhi High Court bars unauthorised non lawyers from appearing before Consumer Courts [Read Order] Delhi High Court bars unauthorised non lawyers from appearing before Consumer Courts [Read Order]

Delhi High Court prohibits unauthorized non-lawyers from appearing in consumer courts, ensuring legal representation aligns with regulations.

Mumbai Consumer Court Dismisses Complaint Against Wow Momo Over Veg-Non-Veg Order Mix-Up [Read Order] Mumbai Consumer Court Dismisses Complaint Against Wow Momo Over Veg-Non-Veg Order Mix-Up [Read Order]

Mumbai Consumer Court dismisses ₹6 lakh complaint against Wow Momo over alleged veg-non-veg order mix-up, citing lack of evidence and bad faith.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-interfere-with-patkars-conviction-in-defamation-case
Trending Judiciary
SC declines to interfere with Patkar's conviction in defamation case

SC refuses to interfere with Medha Patkar’s conviction in 2001 defamation case filed by Delhi L-G V K Saxena, but sets aside ₹1 lakh penalty imposed on her.

11 August, 2025 02:29 PM
sc-directs-for-removing-stray-dogs-in-delhi-ncr
Trending Judiciary
SC directs for removing stray dogs in Delhi NCR

SC orders removal of all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR within 8 weeks, to be housed in shelters; warns against obstruction amid rising rabies, dog-bite cases.

11 August, 2025 06:42 PM
hc-judges-in-no-way-inferior-to-sc-judges-sc
Trending Judiciary
HC judges in no way inferior to SC judges: SC

SC affirms HC judges are equal in stature to SC judges; directs apology for unfounded allegations against Telangana HC judge.

12 August, 2025 12:14 PM
law-does-not-require-to-provide-separate-list-of-electors-not-included-in-draft-rolls
Trending Judiciary
Law does not require to provide separate list of electors not included in draft rolls, EC tells SC

EC tells SC no legal mandate to publish separate list or reasons for voters excluded from draft rolls; affected persons can file claims under Form 6.

12 August, 2025 12:33 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email