38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, January 08, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi HC directs SBI to compensate customer in Cyber Fraud Case, emphasises bank’s responsibility in digital security [Read Judgment]

By Saket Sourav      20 November, 2024 04:06 PM      0 Comments
Delhi HC directs SBI to compensate customer in Cyber Fraud Case emphasises banks responsibility in digital security

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has delivered a significant judgment directing the State Bank of India (SBI) to compensate a customer who lost Rs. 2.60 lakh in a cyber fraud incident, emphasizing banks’ responsibility to protect customers from digital banking fraud.

Justice Dharmesh Sharma made important observations regarding banks’ obligations and customer protection in the realm of digital banking.

Delhi High Court Holds SBI Accountable for Cyber Fraud, Orders Compensation

The court addressed the case of Hare Ram Singh, an academician who fell victim to a vishing attack. Fraudsters tricked him into clicking a malicious link, leading to unauthorized withdrawals from his account. The court noted:

“The petitioner, an academician aged about 55 years, became a victim of cyber fraud perpetrated through a vishing attack wherein innocent people are enticed over voice calls to divulge sensitive information pertaining to their bank accounts.”

Highlighting the bank’s responsibilities, the court observed:

“Banking transactions are both contractual and fiduciary. The bank owes a duty to the customer. Therefore, the bank is bound to protect the interests of the customer in all circumstances.”

The court underscored SBI’s service deficiency, stating:

“Despite prompt intimation from the petitioner about the account breach, the bank showed no urgency. Respondents failed to exercise due care, neglecting their duty to act swiftly upon notification of the fraudulent withdrawal.”

Judgment Reinforces Banks’ Duty to Ensure Robust Digital Security Measures

In its judgment, the court directed SBI to pay Rs. 2.60 lakh with 9% interest from April 18, 2021, along with Rs. 25,000 as legal costs. The court concluded that the case fell under the “zero liability” category as per RBI guidelines, meaning the customer should not bear the loss.

The judgment also emphasized that banks must implement robust security measures and act promptly when customers report suspicious transactions.

Mr. Ravi Chandra appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
Mr. Rajiv Kapur, Mr. Akshit Kapur, Ms. Riya appeared for SBI, and Mr. Abhinav Sharma appeared for RBI.

Case Title: Hare Ram Singh vs Reserve Bank of India & Ors.

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a law graduate from The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has a keen ...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property' 'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property'

In 2012, the Anjuman Committee addressed a letter to the Chairman of the Waqf Board stating there is a wall and Chabutrah (platform) on a 'Tiranga Ki Qalandari Masjid where in olden times laborers used to offer prayers.

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment] Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment]

The Delhi High Court sets aside an Arbitral Tribunal's award favoring IRB Pathankot Amritsar Toll Road Ltd over a delay in a highway project. The court finds that the tribunal did not address the essential dispute of whether the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) was in material default, rendering the award invalid.

Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order] Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order]

A Delhi court refuses to stay the defamation case filed by Union Cabinet minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat against Rajasthan Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot. The court declined to stay the summons and sets a hearing date for August 19.

Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case

Delhi High Court is set to begin day-to-day hearings from August 28 for appeals by CBI and ED against acquittals in the 2G spectrum allocation case, expressing displeasure over adjournment requests. The case involves former telecom minister A Raja and business entities. Learn about the proceedings and details of the case.

TRENDING NEWS

borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM
leela-palace-udaipur-ordered-to-pay-10-lakh-after-housekeeping-staff-enters-occupied-room-without-consent
Trending Business
Leela Palace Udaipur Ordered to Pay ₹10 Lakh After Housekeeping Staff Enters Occupied Room Without Consent [Read Order]

Chennai Consumer Commission orders Leela Palace Udaipur to pay ₹10 lakh and refund room tariff for breach of guest privacy by housekeeping staff.

07 January, 2026 09:43 PM

TOP STORIES

telangana-hc-cannot-seek-extension-beyond-45-day-limit-to-file-written-version-in-consumer-cases
Trending Judiciary
Telangana HC: Cannot Seek Extension Beyond 45-Day Limit to File Written Version in Consumer Cases [Read Order]

Telangana High Court rules written versions in consumer cases cannot be filed beyond the mandatory 45-day limit under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

02 January, 2026 07:13 PM
preventive-detention-cannot-be-used-to-silence-dissenting-voices-of-journalists-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Preventive Detention Cannot Be Used to Silence Dissenting Voices of Journalists: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court warns against misuse of preventive detention to silence journalists, calls it a threat to free speech and liberty.

02 January, 2026 08:04 PM
delhi-hc-upholds-discharge-of-accused-in-gang-rape-case-expresses-concern-over-misuse-of-sexual-offence-laws-and-victim-compensation
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds Discharge of Accused in Gang Rape Case; Expresses Concern Over Misuse of Sexual Offence Laws and Victim Compensation [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court upholds discharge in a gang rape case, flags misuse of sexual offence laws, and issues directions on recovery of victim compensation.

02 January, 2026 08:28 PM
gujarat-hc-rejects-sugar-mills-plea-to-restore-delay-condonation-application-filed-after-seven-years
Trending Judiciary
Gujarat HC Rejects Sugar Mill’s Plea to Restore Delay Condonation Application Filed After Seven Years [Read Judgment]

Gujarat High Court upheld CESTAT’s rejection of a sugar mill’s plea to restore a delay condonation application filed after a seven-year lapse.

02 January, 2026 09:40 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email