38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, August 29, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi HC directs SBI to compensate customer in Cyber Fraud Case, emphasises bank’s responsibility in digital security [Read Judgment]

By Saket Sourav      20 November, 2024 04:06 PM      0 Comments
Delhi HC directs SBI to compensate customer in Cyber Fraud Case emphasises banks responsibility in digital security

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has delivered a significant judgment directing the State Bank of India (SBI) to compensate a customer who lost Rs. 2.60 lakh in a cyber fraud incident, emphasizing banks’ responsibility to protect customers from digital banking fraud.

Justice Dharmesh Sharma made important observations regarding banks’ obligations and customer protection in the realm of digital banking.

Delhi High Court Holds SBI Accountable for Cyber Fraud, Orders Compensation

The court addressed the case of Hare Ram Singh, an academician who fell victim to a vishing attack. Fraudsters tricked him into clicking a malicious link, leading to unauthorized withdrawals from his account. The court noted:

“The petitioner, an academician aged about 55 years, became a victim of cyber fraud perpetrated through a vishing attack wherein innocent people are enticed over voice calls to divulge sensitive information pertaining to their bank accounts.”

Highlighting the bank’s responsibilities, the court observed:

“Banking transactions are both contractual and fiduciary. The bank owes a duty to the customer. Therefore, the bank is bound to protect the interests of the customer in all circumstances.”

The court underscored SBI’s service deficiency, stating:

“Despite prompt intimation from the petitioner about the account breach, the bank showed no urgency. Respondents failed to exercise due care, neglecting their duty to act swiftly upon notification of the fraudulent withdrawal.”

Judgment Reinforces Banks’ Duty to Ensure Robust Digital Security Measures

In its judgment, the court directed SBI to pay Rs. 2.60 lakh with 9% interest from April 18, 2021, along with Rs. 25,000 as legal costs. The court concluded that the case fell under the “zero liability” category as per RBI guidelines, meaning the customer should not bear the loss.

The judgment also emphasized that banks must implement robust security measures and act promptly when customers report suspicious transactions.

Mr. Ravi Chandra appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
Mr. Rajiv Kapur, Mr. Akshit Kapur, Ms. Riya appeared for SBI, and Mr. Abhinav Sharma appeared for RBI.

Case Title: Hare Ram Singh vs Reserve Bank of India & Ors.

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a final-year law student at The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property' 'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property'

In 2012, the Anjuman Committee addressed a letter to the Chairman of the Waqf Board stating there is a wall and Chabutrah (platform) on a 'Tiranga Ki Qalandari Masjid where in olden times laborers used to offer prayers.

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment] Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment]

The Delhi High Court sets aside an Arbitral Tribunal's award favoring IRB Pathankot Amritsar Toll Road Ltd over a delay in a highway project. The court finds that the tribunal did not address the essential dispute of whether the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) was in material default, rendering the award invalid.

Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order] Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order]

A Delhi court refuses to stay the defamation case filed by Union Cabinet minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat against Rajasthan Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot. The court declined to stay the summons and sets a hearing date for August 19.

Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case

Delhi High Court is set to begin day-to-day hearings from August 28 for appeals by CBI and ED against acquittals in the 2G spectrum allocation case, expressing displeasure over adjournment requests. The case involves former telecom minister A Raja and business entities. Learn about the proceedings and details of the case.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

adult-woman-free-to-live-with-married-man-personal-autonomy-prevails-over-morality
Trending Judiciary
Adult Woman Free To Live With Married Man, Personal Autonomy Prevails Over Morality: Madhya Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Adult woman has right to live with married man, rules MP High Court; says personal autonomy outweighs moral concerns.

23 August, 2025 04:00 PM
sc-issues-notice-to-bci-on-plea-against-3-yr-moratorium-on-new-centre-for-legal-education
Trending Judiciary
SC issues notice to BCI on plea against 3-yr moratorium on new centre for legal education

SC issues notice to BCI on plea challenging 3-year moratorium on new legal education centres, calling it arbitrary and violative of fundamental rights.

23 August, 2025 05:13 PM
punjab-and-haryana-hc-upholds-denial-of-furlough-to-life-convict-rules-temporary-release-is-a-concession-not-a-right
Trending Judiciary
Punjab and Haryana HC Upholds Denial of Furlough to Life Convict, Rules Temporary Release Is A Concession, Not A Right [Read Order]

Punjab & Haryana HC upholds denial of furlough to life convict, rules temporary release is a concession, not a right, under 2022 law.

23 August, 2025 05:16 PM
sc-restores-mandatory-20-percent-deposit-for-suspension-of-sentence-in-cheque-bounce-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Restores Mandatory 20% Deposit for Suspension of Sentence in Cheque Bounce Case [Read Order]

SC sets aside P&H HC order; rules 20% deposit mandatory for suspension of sentence in ₹8.65 crore cheque bounce case under NI Act.

25 August, 2025 12:35 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email