38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, March 19, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi HC Grants Jubin Nautiyal Ex Parte Injunction Against AI Platforms, E-Commerce Sites for Personality Rights Violations [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      25 February, 2026 12:48 PM      0 Comments
Delhi HC Grants Jubin Nautiyal Ex Parte Injunction Against AI Platforms E Commerce Sites for Personality Rights Violations

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has granted an ex parte ad interim injunction in favour of singer Jubin Nautiyal in a commercial suit filed to protect his personality and publicity rights against the alleged unauthorised use of his name, voice, likeness, and other distinctive attributes through artificial intelligence platforms and online marketplaces.

The order was passed by Justice Tushar Rao Gedela in CS (COMM) 166/2026, titled Jubin Nautiyal v. Jammable Limited & Ors. The Court was dealing with an application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, seeking urgent interim protection.

Nautiyal approached the Court alleging that several defendants, including AI-driven platforms and e-commerce websites, were commercially exploiting his personality rights. The suit claims that sophisticated machine learning tools and generative AI technologies were being used to create audio and visual content mimicking his voice, vocal style, manner of singing, image, and other identifiable traits without authorisation.

The plaintiff asserted that the unauthorised activities included the creation of AI-generated voice models, digital avatars, face morphing, deepfakes, unauthorised chatbots, and merchandising bearing his name, photograph, caricature, and signature. It was further alleged that certain online marketplaces were advertising and offering for sale merchandise falsely suggesting association with or endorsement by the singer.

Detailing his credentials, Nautiyal placed on record his career trajectory, including participation in the television show X Factor and playback singing in multiple Hindi and regional films. He also highlighted his awards and recognitions, including IIFA Awards in 2022 and 2025, and his substantial social media presence with millions of followers. The plaintiff contended that his personality attributes possess significant commercial value and are exclusively identifiable with him.

After examining the plaint and documents, the Court held that a prima facie case was made out. It observed that considering the plaintiff’s well-known and widely accepted public persona, the balance of convenience lay in his favour. The Court further noted that failure to grant interim protection could result in irreparable injury to his reputation and image, which may not be adequately compensated monetarily.

Accordingly, the Court restrained several defendants, including AI platforms and unknown John Doe entities, from using or exploiting Nautiyal’s personality and publicity rights in any manner, including through artificial intelligence, generative AI, deepfakes, synthesised voices, digital avatars, GIFs, or other technological means for commercial or personal gain.

The Court also directed certain intermediary and e-commerce defendants to take down or block access to infringing content identified in an annexure to the order and to provide necessary details of entities operating such links or content. The injunction extends to restraining the manufacture, sale, advertising, or offering of goods exploiting the plaintiff’s persona.

The Court granted exemption from pre-institution mediation under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act in view of the urgent interim relief sought, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Yamini Manohar v. T.K.D. Keerthi. Exemption under Section 80 of the CPC was also granted in respect of government departments impleaded for the implementation of directions.

Summons have been issued in the suit. The matter is listed before the Joint Registrar on April 28, 2026, for completion of service and pleadings, and before the Court on August 25, 2026.

Case Details:

Case Title: Jubin Nautiyal v. Jammable Limited & Ors.

Court: High Court of Delhi

Case No.: CS (COMM) 166/2026

Date of Order: February 19, 2026

Coram: Justice Tushar Rao Gedela

Counsel for Plaintiff: Mr. Vivek Vidyarthi, Ms. Suvigya Vidyarthi, Ms. Sarvagya Vidyarthi, Mr. Nischay Chaudhary, Ms. Apoorva Singh, Ms. Rushali Rawat and Ms. Samriddhi Shukla, Advocates

Counsel for Defendants: Mr. Rohan Ahuja and Ms. Sugandha Chhibber for D-5 and 9; Mr. Akshay Maloo and Mr. Gyandendra Rathoor for D-15

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a law graduate from The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has a keen ...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property' 'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property'

In 2012, the Anjuman Committee addressed a letter to the Chairman of the Waqf Board stating there is a wall and Chabutrah (platform) on a 'Tiranga Ki Qalandari Masjid where in olden times laborers used to offer prayers.

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment] Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment]

The Delhi High Court sets aside an Arbitral Tribunal's award favoring IRB Pathankot Amritsar Toll Road Ltd over a delay in a highway project. The court finds that the tribunal did not address the essential dispute of whether the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) was in material default, rendering the award invalid.

Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order] Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order]

A Delhi court refuses to stay the defamation case filed by Union Cabinet minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat against Rajasthan Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot. The court declined to stay the summons and sets a hearing date for August 19.

Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case

Delhi High Court is set to begin day-to-day hearings from August 28 for appeals by CBI and ED against acquittals in the 2G spectrum allocation case, expressing displeasure over adjournment requests. The case involves former telecom minister A Raja and business entities. Learn about the proceedings and details of the case.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-sets-aside-ngt-order-for-temple-demolition-holds-tribunal-has-no-jurisdiction-over-encroachments-under-municipal-laws
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets Aside NGT Order for Temple Demolition; Holds Tribunal Has No Jurisdiction Over Encroachments Under Municipal Laws [Read Order]

Supreme Court sets aside NGT order to demolish Ghaziabad temple, ruling tribunal lacks jurisdiction over encroachments under municipal laws.

18 March, 2026 10:41 AM
meghalaya-hc-quashes-ghadc-order-making-st-certificate-mandatory-for-election-nominations
Trending Judiciary
Meghalaya HC Quashes GHADC Order Making ST Certificate Mandatory for Election Nominations [Read Order]

Meghalaya HC quashes GHADC notification mandating ST certificate for poll nominations, cites lack of Governor approval and due process.

18 March, 2026 03:51 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-dismisses-mcgms-challenge-to-arbitral-award-holds-conduct-of-party-relevant-to-decide-jurisdictional-challenge
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses MCGM’s Challenge to Arbitral Award, Holds Conduct of Party Relevant to Decide Jurisdictional Challenge [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court dismisses MCGM’s challenge to arbitral award, holds party conduct relevant while deciding jurisdictional objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act.

13 March, 2026 12:31 PM
sc-pulls-up-railways-over-safety-measures-seeks-detailed-affidavit-on-fund-allocation-and-travel-insurance-disparity
Trending Judiciary
SC Pulls Up Railways Over Safety Measures, Seeks Detailed Affidavit on Fund Allocation and Travel Insurance Disparity [Read Order]

Supreme Court pulls up Railways over slow safety progress, seeks detailed affidavit on fund allocation and says counter ticket passengers cannot be denied travel insurance.

13 March, 2026 02:04 PM
madras-hc-acquits-woman-in-husbands-murder-case-says-section-106-evidence-act-cannot-replace-prosecutions-burden-of-proof
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Acquits Woman in Husband’s Murder Case; Says Section 106 Evidence Act Cannot Replace Prosecution’s Burden of Proof [Read Judgment]

Madras High Court acquits woman in husband’s murder case, holding Section 106 of the Evidence Act cannot substitute the prosecution’s primary burden of proof.

13 March, 2026 02:11 PM
allahabad-hc-lists-waseem-rizvis-pil-challenging-functioning-and-composition-of-up-sunni-central-waqf-board-after-four-weeks
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Lists Waseem Rizvi’s PIL Challenging Functioning and Composition of UP Sunni Central Waqf Board After Four Weeks [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court lists Waseem Rizvi’s PIL challenging the functioning and composition of the UP Sunni Central Waqf Board; Court seeks further hearing on key contention.

14 March, 2026 12:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email