38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, November 21, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi HC Orders Takedown of Fake YouTube Channel Impersonating Anjana Om Kashyap [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      25 June, 2025 06:41 PM      0 Comments
Delhi HC Orders Takedown of Fake YouTube Channel Impersonating Anjana Om Kashyap

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has issued a significant order directing Google LLC to take down a fake YouTube channel that was using deepfake impersonations, news clippings, and videos of prominent news anchor Anjana Om Kashyap without authorization.

Justice Prathiba M. Singh delivered the order on June 20, 2025, in a suit filed by T.V. Today Network Limited and Ms. Anjana Om Kashyap against Google LLC and others, emphasizing the protection of personality rights and the prevention of misinformation in digital media.

The court addressed the commercial suit involving T.V. Today Network Limited, a leading Indian media house engaged in television broadcasting, digital media, and journalistic content creation, running various news channels including Aaj Tak, India Today, and Good News Today.

Ms. Anjana Om Kashyap, who has served as Managing Editor (Special Projects) in the plaintiff company since 2012, operates an official YouTube channel named ‘@AnjanaomKashyap-AOK’ with approximately 39,300 subscribers. However, an unknown person had created a fraudulent channel under the name ‘@AnajanaomKashya’ using her photograph and fake videos.

The court observed, “A perusal of the YouTube pages would show that there is clearly a difference between the YouTube page of the Plaintiff and that of Defendant No. 2. Considering the identity of Defendant No. 2 with the missing ‘P’ in the word ‘Kashyap’, it is clear that the same appears to be a fake YouTube page.”

Addressing the broader implications of such fake channels, the court stated, “Such fake YouTube pages or fake profiles being made using the Plaintiffs’ goodwill, reputation, and personality would be contrary to law. The proliferation of fake YouTube pages of a well-known organisation or a personality could result in enormous damage and dissemination of misinformation as the same would lack editorial control.”

The court further highlighted the responsibility of news broadcasters, stating, “Moreover, in the area of news broadcasting, responsibility has to be taken by the broadcaster and the anchor to ensure that incorrect or misleading news is not disseminated. If fake YouTube pages using the name and image of Plaintiff No. 2 are allowed to come up and be disseminated, the same would violate her personality rights.”

In its comprehensive directive, the court ordered: “Google LLC shall take down the impugned YouTube channel ‘@AnajanaomKashya’, which has been impugned in the present suit, within 48 hours.”

The court also mandated that “The Basic Subscriber Information (BSI) details of the person who has put up this channel shall be disclosed to the Plaintiff within two weeks” and directed Google LLC to “file an account of whatever revenues, if any, which may have been paid to this channel owner, within a period of four weeks.”

Emphasizing the commercial motive behind such impersonation, the court noted, “It is also common knowledge that YouTube pages are created for earning revenues and monetising the same. The use of the entire name of Plaintiff No. 2, with just the deletion of the letter ‘P’, as well as the image, voice, etc., for commercial gain is illegal and contrary to law.”

In a proactive step, the court also directed that if any further fake YouTube channels are identified, “the URL shall be supplied by Defendant No. 1, who shall take them down within 72 hours.”

Mr. Hrishikesh Barua and Mr. Utkarsh Dwivedi, along with Mr. Alman Cleancy, Advocates, appeared for the plaintiffs, while Ms. Mamta R. Jha, Mr. Rohan Ahuja, Ms. Shrutima Ehersa, Mr. Rahul Choudhary, Ms. Himani Sachdeva, and Ms. Devanshi Raj, Advocates, appeared for the defendants.

Case Title: T.V. Today Network Limited & Anr. vs. Google LLC & Ors.

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a final-year law student at The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property' 'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property'

In 2012, the Anjuman Committee addressed a letter to the Chairman of the Waqf Board stating there is a wall and Chabutrah (platform) on a 'Tiranga Ki Qalandari Masjid where in olden times laborers used to offer prayers.

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment] Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment]

The Delhi High Court sets aside an Arbitral Tribunal's award favoring IRB Pathankot Amritsar Toll Road Ltd over a delay in a highway project. The court finds that the tribunal did not address the essential dispute of whether the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) was in material default, rendering the award invalid.

Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order] Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order]

A Delhi court refuses to stay the defamation case filed by Union Cabinet minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat against Rajasthan Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot. The court declined to stay the summons and sets a hearing date for August 19.

Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case

Delhi High Court is set to begin day-to-day hearings from August 28 for appeals by CBI and ED against acquittals in the 2G spectrum allocation case, expressing displeasure over adjournment requests. The case involves former telecom minister A Raja and business entities. Learn about the proceedings and details of the case.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-rejects-judicially-imposed-timelines-for-president-and-governors-on-bill-assent
Trending Judiciary
SC Rejects Judicially Imposed Timelines For President And Governors On Bill Assent

Supreme Court rules that courts cannot impose timelines or grant deemed assent for Bills, affirming flexibility under Articles 200 and 201 and reinforcing separation of powers.

20 November, 2025 12:43 PM

TOP STORIES

pakistan-transfers-sri-lankan-cricket-teams-security-to-army-after-islamabad-terror-attack
Trending News Updates
Pakistan Transfers Sri Lankan Cricket Team’s Security to Army After Islamabad Terror Attack

Pakistan deploys its Army to protect the visiting Sri Lankan cricket team after the Islamabad terror attack, ensuring top-level security for the ongoing tour.

15 November, 2025 11:52 AM
government-clears-45060-crore-export-support-package-with-new-legal-and-institutional-mechanisms
Trending Executive
Government Clears ₹45,060 Crore Export Support Package With New Legal and Institutional Mechanisms

India approves ₹45,060 crore export support package with new legal and digital mechanisms to boost MSMEs, streamline procedures, and strengthen export capacity.

15 November, 2025 01:35 PM
sc-criticises-mp-high-court-for-granting-release-via-habeas-corpus-says-order-shocks-the-conscience
Trending Judiciary
SC Criticises MP High Court for Granting Release via Habeas Corpus, Says Order “Shocks the Conscience” [Read Order]

SC sets aside MP High Court order releasing an accused via habeas corpus, calling the approach impermissible and a misuse of bail jurisdiction.

17 November, 2025 10:20 AM
family-members-undertaking-cannot-replace-bail-conditions-sins-of-accused-cannot-be-visited-on-relatives-sc
Trending Judiciary
Family Member’s Undertaking Cannot Replace Bail Conditions, ‘Sins of Accused Cannot Be Visited On Relatives’: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court sets aside bail in 731 kg ganja case, ruling that a family member’s undertaking cannot substitute mandatory conditions under the NDPS Act.

17 November, 2025 10:33 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email