38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, May 01, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi HC Suspends VC Proceedings After Participant Plays Porn During Hearing

By Saket Sourav      29 April, 2026 05:22 PM      0 Comments
Delhi HC Suspends VC Proceedings After Participant Plays Porn During Hearing

New Delhi: The proceedings at the Delhi High Court were significantly hampered on Wednesday, April 29, 2026, when an extraordinary security breach involving the repeated broadcast of pornographic content forced the suspension of virtual hearings.

The incident occurred in the courtroom of a Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia during the pre-lunch session. The disruption was not a singular event but unfolded in three distinct stages, beginning at approximately 12:56 PM, as the court was preparing to take up matters from its supplementary list.

The first instance of the breach involved an unidentified participant who gained access to the virtual hearing, which was being conducted via the Cisco Webex platform. This individual used the screen-sharing functionality to broadcast explicit pornographic videos and music. In immediate response to this violation of courtroom decorum, the court staff abruptly terminated the video conferencing (VC) session to restore order.

However, the disruption resumed almost immediately after the technical team attempted to restart the proceedings. A user logging in under the suspicious pseudonym “Shitjeet Sighn” or “Sh**jit Singh” re-entered the meeting and once again shared their screen to play objectionable content. This second intrusion led to another immediate shutdown of the virtual link. Reports indicate that the pornographic material was displayed on at least two screens simultaneously during these segments of the conference.

The situation escalated during the third attempt to resume the hearing, when the intruder not only played explicit videos but also broadcast an automated audio message and a text alert. The message, which appeared on the screens of participants, stated, “You’ve been hacked.” Furthermore, a voice was heard claiming that the disruption was a “hack from the United States” and warning the court staff to “shut the meeting right now” and “never turn it on again.”

Following these repeated interruptions, Chief Justice Upadhyaya was forced to suspend the virtual hearing indefinitely for that session. The Chief Justice expressed grave concern over the incident and immediately instructed the Registrar General to take administrative action through available legal mechanisms. He emphasized that the recording or broadcasting of court proceedings without express permission is strictly prohibited under the High Court of Delhi Rules for Video Conferencing for Courts, 2021, and that stringent action would be taken against those responsible for circulating any footage of the breach.

In the aftermath of the incident, the Delhi High Court administration filed a formal complaint with the Intelligence Fusion & Strategic Operations (IFSO) unit of the Delhi Police. The cyber wing has since initiated a preliminary inquiry to examine the nature of the breach, analyze system logs, and assess potential vulnerabilities in the court’s digital infrastructure. Investigators are expected to trace IP addresses to determine whether the intrusion originated domestically or from an external actor.

When virtual proceedings resumed in the post-lunch session, the court implemented significantly tighter access controls to prevent further interference. The virtual meeting was “locked”—a feature on the Cisco Webex platform that prevents new users from entering until permitted by the moderator. Court staff also issued a stern warning in the session’s chatbox, requiring all participants to display their real names and the item number of the case in which they were appearing. Those who failed to comply were warned that they would be expelled from the virtual courtroom.



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a law graduate from The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has a keen ...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property' 'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property'

In 2012, the Anjuman Committee addressed a letter to the Chairman of the Waqf Board stating there is a wall and Chabutrah (platform) on a 'Tiranga Ki Qalandari Masjid where in olden times laborers used to offer prayers.

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment] Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment]

The Delhi High Court sets aside an Arbitral Tribunal's award favoring IRB Pathankot Amritsar Toll Road Ltd over a delay in a highway project. The court finds that the tribunal did not address the essential dispute of whether the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) was in material default, rendering the award invalid.

Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order] Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order]

A Delhi court refuses to stay the defamation case filed by Union Cabinet minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat against Rajasthan Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot. The court declined to stay the summons and sets a hearing date for August 19.

Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case

Delhi High Court is set to begin day-to-day hearings from August 28 for appeals by CBI and ED against acquittals in the 2G spectrum allocation case, expressing displeasure over adjournment requests. The case involves former telecom minister A Raja and business entities. Learn about the proceedings and details of the case.

TRENDING NEWS

pil-in-supreme-court-seeks-removal-of-up-ips-officer-ajay-pal-sharma-as-election-observer-in-west-bengal-polls
Trending Judiciary
PIL in Supreme Court Seeks Removal of UP IPS Officer Ajay Pal Sharma as Election Observer in West Bengal Polls

PIL in Supreme Court challenges appointment of UP IPS officer Ajay Pal Sharma as poll observer in West Bengal, alleging bias and violation of RP Act norms.

30 April, 2026 01:12 PM
bombay-hc-modifies-2046-order-in-defamation-suit-references-to-plaintiffs-age-and-20-year-adjournment-deleted-matter-listed-for-july
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Modifies “2046 Order” in Defamation Suit: References to Plaintiff’s Age and 20-Year Adjournment Deleted; Matter Listed for July [Read Order]

Bombay HC modifies ‘2046’ defamation order, deletes age and 20-year adjournment remarks, lists case for July 15, 2026 hearing.

30 April, 2026 01:18 PM

TOP STORIES

enough-is-enough-scwla-president-mahalakshmi-pavani-condemns-barbaric-attempt-to-murder-advocate-madhu-seeks-immediate-arrest-of-accused
Trending Legal Insiders
“Enough is Enough”: SCWLA President Mahalakshmi Pavani Condemns Barbaric Attempt to Murder Advocate Madhu, Seeks Immediate Arrest of Accused [Read Press Release]

SCWLA condemns brutal sword attack on Advocate Madhu Rajput; critical at AIIMS, accused absconding, immediate arrest demanded.

25 April, 2026 01:24 PM
sc-sets-3-week-deadline-for-nationwide-icu-standards-orders-states-to-submit-action-plans
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets 3-Week Deadline for Nationwide ICU Standards; Orders States to Submit Action Plans [Read Order]

Supreme Court directs States to finalise ICU standards within 3 weeks, impleads Nursing and Paramedical Councils in nationwide framework push.

25 April, 2026 04:30 PM
continuous-mobile-location-sharing-cannot-be-imposed-as-a-bail-condition-karnataka-hc
Trending Judiciary
Continuous Mobile Location-Sharing Cannot Be Imposed As A Bail Condition: Karnataka HC [Read Order]

Karnataka High Court quashes bail condition mandating continuous mobile location-sharing, holding it amounts to impermissible electronic surveillance.

25 April, 2026 04:40 PM
police-cannot-arrest-accused-in-private-complaint-cases-absent-non-bailable-warrant-high-courts-should-not-entertain-anticipatory-bail-in-such-matters-sc
Trending Judiciary
Police Cannot Arrest Accused in Private Complaint Cases Absent Non-Bailable Warrant; High Courts Should Not Entertain Anticipatory Bail in Such Matters: SC

Supreme Court rules police cannot arrest in private complaints without NBW; says High Courts should not entertain anticipatory bail in such cases.

25 April, 2026 05:29 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email