38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 26, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi High Court bars unauthorised non lawyers from appearing before Consumer Courts [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      27 December, 2024 06:16 AM      0 Comments
Delhi HC Bars Unauthorized Non-Lawyers from Representing in Consumer Courts

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has issued significant directions prohibiting unauthorized non-lawyers from representing parties before consumer courts, addressing growing concerns about legal representation in consumer disputes.

Delhi HC Enforces Strict Rules on Legal Representation in Consumer Courts

Justice Sanjeev Narula heard a petition filed by practicing advocates registered with the Bar Council of Delhi, who highlighted systemic issues regarding representation by non-advocates, agents, representatives, and social organizations before Consumer Courts.

The petitioners argued that a concerning trend had emerged where non-advocates were appearing before Consumer Courts without proper authorization, violating the Consumer Protection (Procedure for Regulation of Allowing Appearance of Agents or Representatives or Non-Advocates or Voluntary Organizations before the Consumer Forum) Regulations, 2014.

Non-Lawyers Banned: Delhi HC Ensures Compliance with Advocates Act

The Court examined a specific instance where an advocate had delegated core professional responsibilities to a non-advocate through an authority letter, including powers to sign documents, receive communications, and argue cases. Justice Narula found this practice fundamentally inconsistent with the Advocates Act, 1961, which exclusively reserves these functions for enrolled advocates.

The Court issued several key directions, including mandating all Consumer Commissions in Delhi to ensure representation strictly as per the regulations. The practice of allowing non-advocates to appear based on authority letters from advocates was explicitly prohibited with immediate effect.

Additionally, the Court ordered the State Dispute Redressal Commission and District Dispute Redressal Commissions to provide details of pending cases involving representation by non-advocates. The Bar Council of Delhi and the Bar Council of India were directed to submit their comments on these issues through counter affidavits.

The matter has been scheduled for the next hearing on March 18, 2025.

Advocates Mr. Rahul Sharma, Mr. Vaibhav Singh, Ms. Akanksha Singh, Ms. S. Surender, and Mr. Aniket Tomar appeared for the petitioners.
Mr. Anuj Aggarwal appeared as ASC with Mr. Yash Upadhyay, Mr. Siddhant Dutt, and Ms. Ishita Panday for Respondents 1 & 5.
Mr. T. Singhdev, along with others, appeared for Respondent 2.

Case Title: Anuj Kumar Chauhan And Anr. vs. Lieutenant Governor NCT of Delhi And Ors.

 

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a law graduate from The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has a keen ...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property' 'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property'

In 2012, the Anjuman Committee addressed a letter to the Chairman of the Waqf Board stating there is a wall and Chabutrah (platform) on a 'Tiranga Ki Qalandari Masjid where in olden times laborers used to offer prayers.

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment] Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment]

The Delhi High Court sets aside an Arbitral Tribunal's award favoring IRB Pathankot Amritsar Toll Road Ltd over a delay in a highway project. The court finds that the tribunal did not address the essential dispute of whether the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) was in material default, rendering the award invalid.

Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order] Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order]

A Delhi court refuses to stay the defamation case filed by Union Cabinet minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat against Rajasthan Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot. The court declined to stay the summons and sets a hearing date for August 19.

Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case

Delhi High Court is set to begin day-to-day hearings from August 28 for appeals by CBI and ED against acquittals in the 2G spectrum allocation case, expressing displeasure over adjournment requests. The case involves former telecom minister A Raja and business entities. Learn about the proceedings and details of the case.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

big-relief-for-sameer-wankhede-as-cat-quashes-charge-memorandum-slams-authorities-for-malafide-prosecution
Trending Crime, Police And Law
Big Relief For Sameer Wankhede As CAT Quashes Charge Memorandum, Slams Authorities For Malafide Prosecution [Read Order]

CAT quashes charge memorandum against IRS officer Sameer Wankhede, citing mala fide intent, procedural violations, and contempt of court orders.

20 January, 2026 04:59 PM
punjab-and-haryana-hc-refuses-to-entertain-pil-against-anjana-om-kashyap-over-valmiki-remarks-calls-it-mythology-not-history
Trending Judiciary
Punjab & Haryana HC Refuses to Entertain PIL Against Anjana Om Kashyap Over Valmiki Remarks, Calls It Mythology Not History

Punjab & Haryana High Court dismisses PIL against Anjana Om Kashyap over Valmiki remarks, holding the narrative to be mythological, not historical.

20 January, 2026 05:42 PM
patna-hc-backs-aadhaar-based-attendance-in-medical-colleges-contrasts-allahabad-hc-ruling-on-madarsa-closure
Trending Judiciary
Patna HC Backs Aadhaar-Based Attendance in Medical Colleges; Contrasts Allahabad HC Ruling on Madarsa Closure [Read Judgment]

Patna High Court upholds Aadhaar-linked facial recognition attendance for medical faculty, ruling it does not violate privacy rights under Article 21.

20 January, 2026 07:22 PM
unnao-rape-case-sengars-daughter-breaks-silence-my-father-is-not-a-rapist-exclusive
Trending Videos
Unnao Rape Case: Sengar’s Daughter Breaks Silence | “My Father Is Not a Rapist” | Exclusive

In an explosive and exclusive interview with LawStreet Journal, the daughter of Kuldeep Singh Sengar breaks her silence on the Unnao rape case, making several revelations and asserting that her father is not a rapist.

21 January, 2026 01:29 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email