38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, November 20, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi High Court bars unauthorised non lawyers from appearing before Consumer Courts [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      27 December, 2024 06:16 AM      0 Comments
Delhi HC Bars Unauthorized Non-Lawyers from Representing in Consumer Courts

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has issued significant directions prohibiting unauthorized non-lawyers from representing parties before consumer courts, addressing growing concerns about legal representation in consumer disputes.

Delhi HC Enforces Strict Rules on Legal Representation in Consumer Courts

Justice Sanjeev Narula heard a petition filed by practicing advocates registered with the Bar Council of Delhi, who highlighted systemic issues regarding representation by non-advocates, agents, representatives, and social organizations before Consumer Courts.

The petitioners argued that a concerning trend had emerged where non-advocates were appearing before Consumer Courts without proper authorization, violating the Consumer Protection (Procedure for Regulation of Allowing Appearance of Agents or Representatives or Non-Advocates or Voluntary Organizations before the Consumer Forum) Regulations, 2014.

Non-Lawyers Banned: Delhi HC Ensures Compliance with Advocates Act

The Court examined a specific instance where an advocate had delegated core professional responsibilities to a non-advocate through an authority letter, including powers to sign documents, receive communications, and argue cases. Justice Narula found this practice fundamentally inconsistent with the Advocates Act, 1961, which exclusively reserves these functions for enrolled advocates.

The Court issued several key directions, including mandating all Consumer Commissions in Delhi to ensure representation strictly as per the regulations. The practice of allowing non-advocates to appear based on authority letters from advocates was explicitly prohibited with immediate effect.

Additionally, the Court ordered the State Dispute Redressal Commission and District Dispute Redressal Commissions to provide details of pending cases involving representation by non-advocates. The Bar Council of Delhi and the Bar Council of India were directed to submit their comments on these issues through counter affidavits.

The matter has been scheduled for the next hearing on March 18, 2025.

Advocates Mr. Rahul Sharma, Mr. Vaibhav Singh, Ms. Akanksha Singh, Ms. S. Surender, and Mr. Aniket Tomar appeared for the petitioners.
Mr. Anuj Aggarwal appeared as ASC with Mr. Yash Upadhyay, Mr. Siddhant Dutt, and Ms. Ishita Panday for Respondents 1 & 5.
Mr. T. Singhdev, along with others, appeared for Respondent 2.

Case Title: Anuj Kumar Chauhan And Anr. vs. Lieutenant Governor NCT of Delhi And Ors.

 

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a final-year law student at The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property' 'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property'

In 2012, the Anjuman Committee addressed a letter to the Chairman of the Waqf Board stating there is a wall and Chabutrah (platform) on a 'Tiranga Ki Qalandari Masjid where in olden times laborers used to offer prayers.

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment] Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment]

The Delhi High Court sets aside an Arbitral Tribunal's award favoring IRB Pathankot Amritsar Toll Road Ltd over a delay in a highway project. The court finds that the tribunal did not address the essential dispute of whether the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) was in material default, rendering the award invalid.

Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order] Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order]

A Delhi court refuses to stay the defamation case filed by Union Cabinet minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat against Rajasthan Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot. The court declined to stay the summons and sets a hearing date for August 19.

Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case

Delhi High Court is set to begin day-to-day hearings from August 28 for appeals by CBI and ED against acquittals in the 2G spectrum allocation case, expressing displeasure over adjournment requests. The case involves former telecom minister A Raja and business entities. Learn about the proceedings and details of the case.

TRENDING NEWS

srinagar-court-grants-transit-remand-of-alleged-co-conspirator-in-red-fort-car-blast-to-nia-for-production-before-delhi-court
Trending Judiciary
Srinagar Court Grants Transit Remand of Alleged Co-Conspirator in Red Fort Car Blast to NIA for Production Before Delhi Court

Srinagar court grants NIA transit remand of alleged Red Fort blast co-conspirator Jasir Bilal Wani for production before Delhi Special Court.

19 November, 2025 03:13 PM
credai-wins-major-relief-as-supreme-court-recalls-ruling-invalidating-ex-post-facto-environmental-clearances
Trending Business
CREDAI Wins Major Relief as Supreme Court Recalls Ruling Invalidating Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearances [Read Judgment]

The Supreme Court recalls its ruling against ex post facto environmental clearances after CREDAI’s review, restoring the case for fresh consideration.

19 November, 2025 03:33 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-slams-maharashtra-police-over-four-year-delay-in-framing-charges-seeks-explanation-from-sp-and-trial-court
Trending Judiciary
SC Slams Maharashtra Police Over Four-Year Delay In Framing Charges; Seeks Explanation From SP And Trial Court [Read Order]

The Supreme Court criticises Maharashtra Police for a four-year delay in framing charges and seeks explanations from the SP and Trial Court over prolonged incarceration.

14 November, 2025 10:19 AM
jharkhand-hc-dismisses-pil-seeking-mandatory-disclosure-of-criminal-cases-against-election-candidates
Trending Judiciary
Jharkhand HC Dismisses PIL Seeking Mandatory Disclosure of Criminal Cases Against Election Candidates [Read Order]

Jharkhand High Court dismisses PIL seeking mandatory disclosure of pending criminal cases against election candidates, holding no statutory duty exists.

14 November, 2025 11:19 AM
calcutta-hc-sets-aside-speakers-order-declares-mukul-roy-disqualified-under-tenth-schedule-from-june-11-2021
Trending Judiciary
Calcutta HC Sets Aside Speaker’s Order; Declares Mukul Roy Disqualified Under Tenth Schedule From June 11, 2021 [Read Order]

Calcutta High Court sets aside the Speaker’s order and declares Mukul Roy disqualified under the Tenth Schedule with effect from June 11, 2021.

14 November, 2025 11:58 AM
remarriage-does-not-extinguish-statutory-right-to-compassionate-appointment-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Remarriage Does Not Extinguish Statutory Right To Compassionate Appointment: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Remarriage does not bar compassionate appointment, rules Kerala High Court, holding that dependents retain statutory rights under Rule 51B despite remarriage.

14 November, 2025 12:19 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email