38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, July 18, 2024
Judiciary

Merely Because DNA Report Doesnt Match with the Victim Constitutes No Ground to Free Accused from Involvement in Gang Rape: P&H HC [READ ORDER]

By Harshil Jain      25 July, 2020 05:24 PM      0 Comments
Merely Because DNA Report Doesnt Match with the Victim Constitutes No Ground to Free Accused from Involvement in Gang Rape: P&H HC [READ ORDER]

While denying bail top a gang rape accused, the Punjab and Haryana High Court observed, Merely because the DNA report (of the rape victim) does not match with the petitioner cannot be termed to be a circumstance to conclude that the petitioner is not involved in the crime.

The matter, concerning a bail plea, was heard by a single bench of Justice Vivek Puri. The petitioner was booked, in a FIR dated 4 May 2018, under Sections 342/363/366A/506 read with Section 34 IPC and Sections 6 and 7 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO).

The FIR had been registered on the instance of the victims father. He alleged that in the intervening night of 3/4 May 2018, between 12:00 afternoon and 2 A.M., his daughter had come to his shop to give him tea. When returning back, she was kidnapped by three men- Bir Singh, Naveen (the present petitioner), and an unknown boy.

The complainant ran after their vehicle and afterward found her in a room, with the three boys present there. The victim told that she was subjected to gang rape by Bir Singh, Naveen, Sonu, and another boy. They threatened her that if she will disclose the incident to anyone outside, they will kill her, she added.

The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner, Naveen, was found innocent during the investigation and was summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C. one of the co-accused, Sonu, was granted bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court, he added. Further, he submitted that the DNA report did not match with the petitioner.

The counsel for the complainant retorted, saying that the two cases are different, and the petitioners case is not at par with that of co-accused Sonu.

The petitioner had been summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C. because the victim had leveled specific and categorical allegations against the accused persons. The petitioner was summoned vide Order dated 7 January 2019, which was upheld by the Court, vide order dated 9 July 2019 in CRR- 1423-2019, added the state counsel.

The Bench observed, It is a case of gang rape and merely because the DNA report does not match with the petitioner cannot be termed to be a circumstance to conclude that the petitioner is not involved in the crime.

In her (victims) statement recorded during the course of the trial, the victim has specifically and categorically identified Bir Singh and Naveen, though, she has denied the implication of Sonu, co-accused. Merely because the petitioner was found innocent during the investigation cannot be construed as a mitigating circumstance to extend concession of bail, it added.

The Court concluded that, in the given circumstance, no ground seems to provide for the extension of bail to the petitioner.

 

[READ ORDER]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

zero-fir-heres-all-you-need-to-know
Trending Know The Law
Zero FIR: Here’s all you need to know!

Understanding Zero FIR: Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 154 allows FIR at any police station. E-FIR under Section 173 ensures efficient crime reporting in India.

17 July, 2024 01:25 PM
judicial-activist-ashwini-upadhyay-asks-sc-to-declare-amendment-to-preamble-as-unconstitutional
Trending Judiciary
Judicial activist Ashwini Upadhyay asks SC to declare amendment to Preamble as unconstitutional

Judicial activist Ashwini Upadhyay petitions SC to declare the 42nd Amendment to the Preamble, which added "Socialist," "Secular," and "Integrity," as unconstitutional.

17 July, 2024 05:14 PM

TOP STORIES

bombay-high-court-denies-interim-relief-in-plea-against-1-year-pan-masala-ban
Trending Judiciary
Bombay High Court denies interim relief in plea against 1 year Pan Masala Ban [Read Order]

Bombay High Court denies interim relief to petitioners challenging the 1-year ban on pan masala, citing arguable questions and ongoing similar cases.

12 July, 2024 10:00 AM
sc-collegium-recommends-appointment-of-chief-justices-of-eight-high-courts
Trending Judiciary
SC Collegium recommends appointment of Chief Justices of eight High Courts [Read Order]

SC Collegium recommends appointments of Chief Justices for Delhi, Himachal Pradesh, J&K, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Madras, and Meghalaya High Courts.

12 July, 2024 10:55 AM
sc-orders-interim-bail-for-kejriwal-in-ed-case-refers-issues-on-arrest-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
SC orders interim bail for Kejriwal in ED case, refers issues on arrest to larger bench

SC grants interim bail to Kejriwal in ED case, refers arrest issues to larger bench; AAP leader remains in jail due to separate CBI arrest in liquor scam.

12 July, 2024 11:21 AM
hathras-incident-sc-refuses-to-consider-pil-on-inquiry-adequate-compensation
Trending Judiciary
Hathras incident: SC refuses to consider PIL on inquiry, adequate compensation

Supreme Court declines PIL on Hathras stampede inquiry and compensation, directs petitioner to approach High Court for addressing the issue.

12 July, 2024 01:38 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email