New Delhi, India  
Judiciary

Imposition of Special Fees for Allotment of Fancy Numbers is Contrary to the Motor Vehicles Act 1998, says Amicus Curiae to SC

By Shreya Tulavi      21 August, 2020 08:20 PM      0 Comments
Imposition of Special Fees for Allotment of Fancy Numbers is Contrary to the Motor Vehicles Act 1998, says Amicus Curiae to SC

In the matter concerning payment of special fee against allotment of special registration numbers for vehicles, senior advocate Manoj Swarup has submitted before the Supreme Court in front of the division bench comprising of Justices L. Nageswara Rao and S. Ravindra Bhat, that the state governments are not empowered to charge additional fees for the registration unless given in the Motor Vehicles Act.

The written submission has been filed against the Madhya Pradesh government opposing the state appeal and stating that the notification issued by the government is ultra vires Section 41 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1998. He submitted that section 41 of the MV act contemplates application for registration of Motor Vehicles and lays down steps until final registration, including the registration fees. The same stipulates any fees that may be charged for allotment as is done by the state government as given in section 41(6) of the act.

Regarding the fees for the attachment of other documents and information, Swarup submitted that it has been clearly mentioned in section 41(2) for the fees incurred during the process by the central government and the state government does not have the power to levy any fees apart from that. It can be seen that - State government has assumed to itself the function of allotment.

He further enumerated that the rule-making power of the central and the state government has been clearly defined. It has been pointed out in Sub-section (o) of Section 64 (Power of Central Government to make rules) of the Act specifically contemplates the power of the Central government to determine the fees and other issues. Further, the provision is specifically excluded from Section 65 (Power of State Government to make rules) of the Act, thus indicating that the powers given to the centre are not given to the state also.

The written submission also contained that there is no specific authorization in act to levy fees in the name of registration of special numbers. The state government cannot charge the vehicle owners in the name of special numbers. However, in section 64(h) and 65(k) of the Act allows the state government to prescribe fees but that too only under certain circumstances, which nowhere relate to the registration fees.

Similarly, it states that the reference of Section 211 of the Act has been submitted that the same is placed in Chapter XIV of the Act, titled "Miscellaneous", as against section41(2) of the act. It is important to note that this additional fee goes against the objective of the Motor Vehicles Act. This act was enacted with the objective of bringing a uniform regime throughout the country. However, by the imposition of fees by the Madhya Pradesh government the entire objective of the act is demolished.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

calcutta-hc-refuses-to-stall-wb-govts-cattle-slaughter-rules-ahead-of-eid-orders-state-to-clarify-cow-sacrifice-not-religious-requirement
Trending Judiciary
Calcutta HC Refuses To Stall WB Govt’s Cattle Slaughter Rules Ahead Of Eid, Orders State To Clarify ‘Cow Sacrifice Not Religious Requirement’ [Read Order]

Calcutta High Court Refuses To Stay WB Cattle Slaughter Rules Ahead Of Eid, Says Cow Sacrifice Not Essential Religious Practice Under Islam

22 May, 2026 03:34 PM
wife-marrying-off-daughter-secretly-constitutes-mental-cruelty-to-husband-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Wife Marrying Off Daughter Secretly Constitutes Mental Cruelty to Husband: Madras HC [Read Judgment]

Madras High Court grants divorce, holding that secretly arranging daughter’s marriage without informing the father amounts to mental cruelty.

22 May, 2026 05:01 PM

TOP STORIES

cannot-penalise-lawyers-for-attending-court-despite-boycott-calls-tripura-hc
Trending Judiciary
Cannot Penalise Lawyers For Attending Court Despite Boycott Calls: Tripura HC [Read Order]

Tripura High Court held that Bar Associations cannot penalise advocates for appearing in court despite boycott calls by lawyers’ bodies.

18 May, 2026 03:57 PM
tcs-posh-panel-member-denied-bail-in-nashik-harassment-case
Trending Business
TCS POSH Panel Member Denied Bail in Nashik Harassment Case [Read Order]

Nashik court denied bail to a TCS POSH panel member in a workplace harassment case, citing alleged inaction on repeated complaints.

18 May, 2026 04:10 PM
rajasthan-hc-grants-divorce-calls-atta-satta-a-form-of-gender-coercion-and-familial-extortion
Trending Judiciary
Rajasthan HC Grants Divorce, Calls ‘Atta-Satta’ a Form of “Gender Coercion and Familial Extortion” [Read Judgment]

Rajasthan High Court grants divorce, condemns atta-satta custom as “gender coercion and familial extortion disguised as custom.”

18 May, 2026 04:57 PM
senior-advocate-mahalakshmi-pavani-among-members-of-new-supreme-court-election-tribunals
Trending Judiciary
Senior Advocate Mahalakshmi Pavani Among Members of New Supreme Court Election Tribunals [Read Order]

Supreme Court forms two new Election Tribunals for State Bar Council poll disputes; Senior Advocate Mahalakshmi Pavani named a member.

19 May, 2026 11:48 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email