38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, June 22, 2024

Kashmir Lockdown: SC Issues Guidelines In Relation To The Kashmir Issue: Highlights

By LawStreet News Network      10 January, 2020 03:01 PM      0 Comments
Kashmir Lockdown: SC Issues Guidelines In Relation To The Kashmir Issue: Highlights

Post abrogation of Article 370 from Jammu and Kashmir, the Central Government had imposed many restrictions on its people. But even after five months of imposing curfew, internet service could not be restored in the state. However, the Central Government has claimed that Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been removed from many places and this ban continues in only a few places. The bench consisting of Justice NV Ramana, Justice Subhash Reddy and Justice BR Gavai, has heard the petitions against these restrictions today (January 10, 2020). On August 5, 2019, the special status of Jammu and Kashmir was abolished and it was divided into two centrally ruled states. Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh have been shut off in the valley since then and only broadband services are connected. The government has also recently launched landline phones and post-paid mobile services.

The Supreme Court has laid down several guidelines regarding the Government action in J&K:

  1. The government should review all restrictions issued in Jammu and Kashmir within 7 days of passing of the order.
  2. Service of the Internet should be restored in government and local bodies where internet misuse is less. Business is completely dependent on the Internet.
  3. Internet ban in Jammu and Kashmir should be reviewed with immediate effect. Internet is also a means of freedom of speech and expression. The right to internet is included in the right to free speech under Article 19 (1) (a) of the Constitution.
  4. Internet cannot be banned indefinitely. Restrictions on the Internet should be reviewed periodically.
  5. The suspension of Internet and basic freedom cannot be an arbitrary exercise of power.
  6. The magistrate should use discretion while ordering restrictions under Section 144 of CrPC, looking at the ratio of danger to the freedom and safety of citizens. Repeating the issuance of orders in the same manner repeatedly is a violation. Prohibitory orders cannot be imposed under Section 144 of CrPC for dissent.
  7. The Government of Jammu and Kashmir should make the decision of imposing Section 144 public and if affected, the person can challenge it.

[Read Judgment]

Share this article:

User Avatar

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Judiciary
Gravity of offence not relevant when considering bail for juvenile [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants bail to a juvenile in a serious criminal case, ruling that the gravity of the offence is not a relevant factor in bail decisions.

22 June, 2024 11:18 AM
Trending Executive
New Anti-Cheating Law enacted: Analysis

In-depth analysis of India’s new Anti-Cheating Law, the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024, aimed at curbing exam malpractices.

22 June, 2024 11:38 AM


Trending Crime, Police And Law
Women, including housewife, approach NCW against controversial IPS officer Gyaneshwar Singh

Two women approach NCW against controversial IPS officer Gyaneshwar Singh, citing harassment for tweets based on news reports about his involvement in high-profile cases.

17 June, 2024 03:10 PM
Trending Judiciary
Courts this Week: Law Street Journal's Weekly Round-Up of SC & HCs [June 10 - June 15]

Get the latest updates from the Supreme Court of India and the High Courts ! Here’s a round up of the week's top legal stories in a quick, easy-to-read summary.

17 June, 2024 03:29 PM
Trending Business
Man sues Apple for £5 million, blaming company for divorce after wife discovers ‘deleted messages’ with sex workers

A UK man sues Apple for £5M, claiming their unclear policy on deleted messages led to his divorce after his wife found texts to sex workers on another device.

17 June, 2024 04:26 PM
Trending Crime, Police And Law
Ex-Karnataka CM Yediyurappa appears before CID for POCSO case probe, with protection of 'no arrest'

Ex-Karnataka CM Yediyurappa appears before CID for POCSO case probe, denies allegations, granted ‘no arrest’ protection. Next hearing: June 28.

17 June, 2024 04:46 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email