38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, December 18, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Former State BJP Chief Of Kerala Moves SC Says 'No Legal Right Of The State Is Affected' In The Anti-CAA Suit

By LawStreet News Network      18 January, 2020 01:01 PM      0 Comments
Former State BJP Chief Of Kerala Moves SC Says 'No Legal Right Of The State Is Affected' In The Anti-CAA Suit

On January 14, 2020 the state of Kerala had challenged the Union legislation - the Citizenship (Amendemet) Act (CAA), 2019 under Article 131 of the Constitution of India, 1950. Now yesterday on January 17, 2020 former Kerala BJP state president and ex-Governor of Mizoram Kummanam Rajasekharan has filed an impleadment application in the Supreme Court and challenged the maintainability of the suit filed by the Kerala Government. Besides him, there is also a 2nd applicant named Ajikumar who is a social worker. Both the applicants are registered voters in Kerala. 

They have mentioned in the application that they are aggrieved by the action of the petitioner (State of Kerala) as they have filed a petition without considering the majority view of the people of Kerala and it will burden the public exchequer unnecessarily. 

They alleged that the petitioners have listed the minorities who have not been included from the Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh as well as other neighbouring countries, but have failed to prove or give any record of how they are facing persecution. 

It is pleaded in the application that there is no need to invoke the original and exclusive jurisdiction of the Supreme Court as the situation isnt so grave and there is no legal dispute, if there is a dispute then it is political dispute. 

To substantiate this argument, they cited State of Karnataka v. Union of India [1978 SC 68] in which SC has held that the dispute must involve a question relating to a legal right and not a political right. They also argued that the petitioners havent made out any substantial case which will show that through CAA, existing legal rights and the liberty of the State of Kerala or its inhabitants are affected. 

It is further alleged that the petitioners have filed the suit without even consulting the executive head of the state, namely the Governor. In reality the Governor has openly declared that the Act is perfectly constitutional.

They also contended that they have made out a prima facie case of violation of their right and requested the Court to implead them in the suit.

There is no notice or order as to the application. The matter has been adjourned. 

Author: Parth Thummar 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

madras-hc-invokes-ancient-rajadharma-and-kautilyas-arthashastra-govt-has-constitutional-duty-to-provide-legal-aid-to-indian-citizens-abroad
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Invokes Ancient ‘Rajadharma’ and Kautilya’s Arthashastra: Govt Has Constitutional Duty to Provide Legal Aid to Indian Citizens Abroad [Read Order]

Madras High Court invokes Rajadharma and Arthashastra, holds India has a constitutional duty to provide legal aid to citizens facing disputes abroad.

17 December, 2025 06:25 PM
sc-flags-exploitation-of-deity-criticises-paid-special-pujas-at-bankey-bihari-temple
Trending Judiciary
SC Flags ‘Exploitation’ of Deity, Criticises Paid ‘Special Pujas’ at Bankey Bihari Temple

Supreme Court flags exploitation of deity, questions paid special pujas at Bankey Bihari Temple, citing inequality and violation of sacred resting hours.

17 December, 2025 06:36 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-orders-aiims-to-form-secondary-medical-board-to-evaluate-passive-euthanasia-for-man-in-vegetative-state-for-13-years
Trending Judiciary
SC Orders AIIMS to Form Secondary Medical Board to Evaluate Passive Euthanasia for Man in Vegetative State for 13 Years [Read Order]

Supreme Court directs AIIMS to form a Secondary Medical Board to assess passive euthanasia for a man in a vegetative state for 13 years.

13 December, 2025 06:00 PM
endless-compassion-not-permissible-sc-bars-claims-for-higher-post-after-compassionate-appointment
Trending Judiciary
‘Endless Compassion Not Permissible’: SC Bars Claims for Higher Post After Compassionate Appointment [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that employees cannot seek higher posts after accepting compassionate appointment, calling such claims “endless compassion.”

13 December, 2025 06:54 PM
property-tax-appeal-only-tax-amount-payable-penal-interest-not-mandatory-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Property Tax Appeal: Only Tax Amount Payable, Penal Interest Not Mandatory: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules that municipalities cannot insist on penal interest for entertaining tax appeals; only the tax amount under Section 509(11) is required.

13 December, 2025 07:09 PM
sc-expands-ambit-of-posh-act-restrictive-interpretation-would-undermine-remedial-intent
Trending Judiciary
SC Expands Ambit of POSH Act: “Restrictive Interpretation Would Undermine Remedial Intent” [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules ICC at aggrieved woman’s workplace has jurisdiction under POSH Act, rejecting restrictive interpretation and reinforcing women’s right to safety.

13 December, 2025 07:13 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email