38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, March 05, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Muzaffarpur Shelter case: Quantum of punishment will be decided after February 4, 2020

By LawStreet News Network      28 January, 2020 05:01 PM      0 Comments
Muzaffarpur Shelter case: Quantum of punishment will be decided after February 4, 2020

In Bihars Muzaffarpur Shelter home case, Saket Court was adjourned today (January 28, 2020) as the concerned judge was on leave. Now, quantum of punishment will be decided after February 4, 2020.

On January 20, 2020, Saket Court of Delhi convicted Brajesh Thakur and 18 other accused for aggravated sexual assault under POCSO Act and gang rape. Quantum of sentence was scheduled to be decided on January 28, 2020.

The shelter home was run by NGO Sewa Sankalp Evam Vikas Samiti at Muzaffarpur, Bihar. Brajesh Thakur, Former Bihar People's Party (BPP) MLA, ran the shelter home where many girls were raped and assaulted, was convicted for aggravated sexual assault under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 and gang rape.

Additional Sessions Judge Saurabh Kulshreshtha convicted Thakur for aggravated sexual assault under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012, gang rape, rape and other related offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015

One accused was acquitted by court. Currently, Thakur and other 18 convicts of the case are in Tihar Jail. 

Case Brief:

The incident was first reported in April, 2018, after the Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS) submitted a report to the Bihar government, detailing the abuse.

On May 29, 2018, the Bihar government shifted the girls from the shelter home to other protection homes in Madhubani, Patna and Mokama. An FIR was lodged against the 11 accused in the case on May 31, 2018.

The Supreme Court on August 2, 2018 took  suo moto cognisance of the alleged sexual assaults of about 34 minor girls in Muzaffarpur's shelter home and transferred the probe to the CBI on November 28, 2018.

On February 12, 2019 Supreme Court transferred Muzaffarpur Shelter home trial to Delhis Saket Court.

Author: Satwik Sharma



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

rouse-avenue-court-discharges-arvind-kejriwal-manish-sisodia-and-21-others-in-delhi-excise-policy-case-slams-cbi-for-lack-of-evidence
Trending Executive
Rouse Avenue Court Discharges Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and 21 Others in Delhi Excise Policy Case; Slams CBI for Lack of Evidence

Rouse Avenue Court discharges Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and 21 others in Delhi Excise Policy case, citing lack of evidence.

27 February, 2026 12:29 PM
sc-imposes-blanket-ban-on-ncert-class-8-social-science-book-over-corruption-in-judiciary-chapter-issues-contempt-notices
Trending Judiciary
SC Imposes Blanket Ban on NCERT Class 8 Social Science Book Over ‘Corruption in Judiciary’ Chapter, Issues Contempt Notices [Read Order]

Supreme Court bans NCERT Class 8 textbook over ‘Corruption in Judiciary’ chapter, issues contempt notices and orders nationwide seizure.

27 February, 2026 01:00 PM
sc-holds-limitation-in-drugs-and-cosmetics-act-prosecution-begins-when-identity-of-accused-is-known-not-from-date-of-complaint
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Limitation in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Prosecution Begins When Identity of Accused Is Known, Not From Date of Complaint [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules limitation in Drugs Act cases begins when identity of accused is known, not from first complaint; Section 202 CrPC not mandatory for public servants.

27 February, 2026 01:30 PM
maintenance-obligation-absolute-cannot-be-evaded-on-pretext-of-unemployment-or-pendency-of-other-proceedings-andhra-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Maintenance Obligation Absolute, Cannot Be Evaded on Pretext of Unemployment or Pendency of Other Proceedings: Andhra Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Andhra Pradesh High Court rules maintenance is absolute; unemployment or pending cases cannot excuse a husband from paying wife and child.

02 March, 2026 01:00 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email