New Delhi, India  
Breaking News
Judiciary

No Court Permission Needed For 24-Week Pregnancy Termination Under MTP Act : MP HC

By Saket Sourav      31 minutes ago      0 Comments
No Court Permission Needed For 24Week Pregnancy Termination Under MTP Act MP HC

Indore: The Madhya Pradesh High Court, Indore Bench, has dismissed a writ petition filed by a minor seeking directions for termination of her pregnancy, holding that no judicial proceedings were required for the termination in view of Sections 3(2)(a) and 3(2)(b) of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971. 

Justice Sandeep N. Bhatt directed the concerned authorities to take note of the position and asked the Health Department to sensitise government hospitals accordingly.

The petitioner, described in the proceedings as X Minor, had approached the High Court against the State of Madhya Pradesh and others, with her pregnancy at the relevant time being about 24 weeks.

The Court referred to the observations of a Division Bench of the same High Court in In Reference (Suo Motu) v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others, decided on 20th February, 2025 and reported at (2025) ILR (MP) 1226, specifically paragraphs 4, 5(b), 8, 9, 11 and 13(a) thereof. Applying that ruling, the Court held:

"...where the pregnancy of the victim is about 24 weeks, in view of section 3(2)(a) and 3(2)(b) of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, the judicial proceedings are not required."

The Court directed that the concerned respondent authority take note of this position, and further directed the Commissioner, Health Department, to communicate the Division Bench's order to all concerned hospitals, particularly government hospitals, so that the situation could be appropriately handled in future without requiring judicial intervention.

Holding that no intervention was called for in the matter in light of these directions, the High Court dismissed the writ petition.

Appearances

For the Petitioner: Ms. Shraddha Garg and Shri Ashish Choubey, Advocates

For the State: Shri Vijay Nagpal, Government Advocate

Case Title : X Minor v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others, Writ Petition No. 32921 of 2026, 2026:MPHC-IND:22410



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a law graduate from The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has a keen ...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Madhya Pradesh High Court has ordered filing of complaint against petitioner for submitting fabricated documents Madhya Pradesh High Court has ordered filing of complaint against petitioner for submitting fabricated documents

The Court pointed out one medical document in particular, wherein there was mentioning of labour pains and contradicted that since petitioner is a male, it makes no sense. In view of the above, the Court opined that the Petitioner unabashedly filed fake documents with utter disdain and disregard for the Court.

Glorification of Women versus Belligerent Female Foeticide in India Glorification of Women versus Belligerent Female Foeticide in India

In Voluntary Health Assn. of Punjab v. Union of India, (2013) 4 SCC 1, the Supreme Court in its watershed judgment on female foeticidedecided it to be the most aggravated form of dehumanization of the human race. The court was observed to have stated that the"Law prohibits it; Scriptures forbid it; philosophy condemns it; ethics deprecate it; morality decries it, and social science abhors it. Its time the executive pulled up its socks and tightened the noose around implementation of the PC & PNDT Act. The duality around women with exhalation of deities and contrasting blatant disregard for their basic human rights needs to break the confounds of mere academic debate and reinforce the tenets on which the Constitution of India rests.

High Court Prohibits Compulsion of Hijab and Islamic Texts on Students of Different Faiths at Ganga Jamuna School [Watch Video] High Court Prohibits Compulsion of Hijab and Islamic Texts on Students of Different Faiths at Ganga Jamuna School [Watch Video]

Madhya Pradesh High Court's decision regarding Ganga Jamuna School: Principal and teacher prohibited from enforcing 'hijab' on students of Hindu and Jain faiths. Learn about the court's directives and the case details.

Supreme Court allows Jr. Judge appointment to woman denied the same due to dog bite case Supreme Court allows Jr. Judge appointment to woman denied the same due to dog bite case

The Supreme Court of India overturns Madhya Pradesh High Court's decision, ordering the appointment of a woman who was previously denied the position of Civil Judge (Junior Division) due to a past minor offence related to a dog bite case. The Court emphasizes fairness and justice in its landmark ruling.

New Release

Senior Citizens Rights Handbook

The Senior Citizen Rights Handbook is a comprehensive guide designed to empower elderly citizens with clear and accessible knowledge of their legal and social rights in India.

Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email