38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, October 23, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Orissa High Court Expresses Concern Over Illegal Cow Slaughter Despite 1960 Act [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      12 August, 2025 01:23 PM      0 Comments
Orissa High Court Expresses Concern Over Illegal Cow Slaughter Despite 1960 Act

Odisha: The Orissa High Court on Thursday (August 7, 2025) expressed strong displeasure over the continued illegal slaughter of cows across the State, despite the Odisha Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1960, which strictly prohibits such activity, overriding any custom or usage to the contrary.

Hearing W.P.(C) PIL No. 7048 of 2018, Gau Gyan Foundation vs. State of Odisha & Ors., the Bench comprising Chief Justice Harish Tandon and Justice Murahari Sri Raman observed that although the 1960 Act was enacted more than six decades ago, its provisions have not been implemented in true spirit. The court noted, “The prohibitory law having been enacted as a State legislation has not been ensured in true spirit.”

The Bench referred to Section 3 of the Act, which imposes a complete ban on the slaughter of cows, notwithstanding any contrary custom or usage. While bulls and bullocks may be slaughtered under certain conditions with a written certificate from the competent authority, the court emphasized that these exceptions do not dilute the absolute prohibition on cow slaughter.

The court also stated that the Odisha Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1960, being a special legislation, overrides the provisions of the Odisha Municipality Act, 1950, and the Odisha Municipal Corporation Act, 2003. Even provisions in these laws that appear to allow otherwise must be read harmoniously to preserve the core prohibition under the 1960 Act.

Importantly, the court found that the “competent authority” defined in Section 2(a) of the Act has not been appointed, rendering several provisions of the law unworkable. The Bench remarked that the legislation “cannot be a dead letter nor be put in cold storage” and directed the State Government to appoint the competent authority within three weeks from receipt of the order.

The matter is scheduled for further hearing on September 1, 2025.

Mr. Piyush Panda, Advocate, appeared for the petitioner. Mr. Debasish Tripathy (AGA) represented the State of Odisha, while Mr. P.K. Mohanty, Senior Advocate, appeared for the Cuttack Municipal Corporation.

Case Title: Gau Gyan Foundation vs. State of Odisha & Ors.

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a final-year law student at The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Passport Renewal Request Can't Be Denied Solely On The Basis Of Pendency of Criminal Cases: Orissa High Court Passport Renewal Request Can't Be Denied Solely On The Basis Of Pendency of Criminal Cases: Orissa High Court

In the above circumstance, this Court permits the petitioner to submit the required affidavit/undertaking giving therein the position involving both the criminal cases and supporting documents establishing the petitioner is on bail at least one week of this judgment to the concerned Passport Authority at Bhubaneswar. In the event of receipt of such affidavit, the Passport Authority at Bhubaneswar shall do well in completing the issue of renewal of passport involving the petitioner within a week thereafter.

Orissa HC awards Rs 10 lakh to father who lost child to stray dog attack [Read Judgment] Orissa HC awards Rs 10 lakh to father who lost child to stray dog attack [Read Judgment]

The Orissa High Court recently directed the Puri Municipal Corporation to pay Rs 10 lakhs as compensation to the father of a child who was killed by street dogs in 2016.

Orissa HC rules in favour of BJDs Lok Sabha MP Anubhav Mohanty in divorce plea [Read Judgment] Orissa HC rules in favour of BJDs Lok Sabha MP Anubhav Mohanty in divorce plea [Read Judgment]

The Orissa High Court recently ruled in favor of BJDs Lok Sabha MP Anubhav Mohanty, granting a decree of divorce due to mental cruelty. This decision came after examining the lack of physical intimacy with his wife Varsha Priyadarshini, and the high court's findings differed from the family court's earlier conclusions. The case involved detailed considerations of both parties' statements and evidence.

Indian Courts this Week: Law Street Journal's Weekly Round-Up of SC & HCs [Jan 1 - Jan 6] Indian Courts this Week: Law Street Journal's Weekly Round-Up of SC & HCs [Jan 1 - Jan 6]

A weekly round-up of the top stories from the Supreme Court of India and High Courts across the country summed up in a 3-minute read.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

father-of-deceased-pilot-in-ahmedabad-crash-moves-sc-for-court-monitored-probe
Trending Judiciary
Father of deceased pilot in Ahmedabad crash moves SC for court monitored probe

91-year-old father of pilot killed in Ahmedabad Air India crash moves SC seeking court-monitored probe into alleged biased and flawed investigation.

17 October, 2025 10:54 AM
child-cant-consent-to-sex-life-imprisonment-upheld-for-sexual-assault-on-minor-girl-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Can’t Consent to Sex — Life Imprisonment Upheld for Sexual Assault on Minor Girl: Madras HC [Read Judgment]

Madras HC upholds life imprisonment for assault on minor SC girl, reiterating that a child cannot consent to sex; school records key for age proof.

17 October, 2025 11:45 AM
sc-criticizes-casual-declaration-of-witnesses-as-hostile-upholds-conviction-under-sc-st-act
Trending Judiciary
SC Criticizes Casual Declaration of Witnesses as Hostile, Upholds Conviction under SC/ST Act [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court slams casual practice of declaring witnesses hostile; upholds life imprisonment in SC/ST Act case involving rape of minor girl.

17 October, 2025 11:55 AM
delhi-hc-quashes-22-year-old-complaint-against-advocate-reiterates-that-a-lawyers-office-is-not-a-commercial-activity
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Quashes 22-Year Old Complaint Against Advocate, Reiterates That A Lawyer’s Office Is Not A Commercial Activity [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC quashes 22-year-old complaint against advocate, rules that a lawyer’s office is not a commercial activity under MDP 2001 and Building Bye-Laws.

17 October, 2025 01:42 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email