New Delhi, India  
Judiciary

Panchayati divorce has no recognition in the eyes of law : Punjab and Haryana High Court [READ ORDER]

By Gautami Chakravarty      09 February, 2021 05:29 PM      0 Comments
Panchayati divorce has no recognition in the eyes of law : Punjab and Haryana High Court [READ ORDER]

A Criminal Writ Petition was recently filed before the Punjab and Haryana High Court u/A 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent to safeguard the lives of the petitioners by providing police help to the petitioners and further directing the respondent not to interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioners whereby the Court considering the facts stated that the Panchayati Divorce has no recognition in the eyes of law.

However, with the petition itself, the judgment and decree passed under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 in the case of petitioner No.2 has been attached which clearly goes to show that the petitioners are aware of the law.

Petitioner No.1 was earlier married to one Mandeep Kaur and had taken a Panchayati Divorce on 19.06.2017, whereas, petitioner No.2 was earlier married to one Harjinder Singh and had got a divorce under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Learned counsel has also not been able to show as to how this Court can provide protection to the petitioners as a couple when petitioner No.1 has not legally divorced his earlier spouse. In fact, the alleged marriage itself between petitioner No.1 and petitioner No.2 would be illegal and against the provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 inasmuch as this marriage has been contracted without petitioner No.1 being legally divorced.

The Petitioner in its contentions stated before the Court that they apprehended danger to their life and liberty. The petitioners approached this Court for protection of their life and liberty to live as a couple which cannot be considered in the facts and circumstances of the present case. It was hels that the present petition is not maintainable at the behest of the petitioners who have got married without petitioner No.1 being legally and validly divorced.

After the enactment of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, marriages and divorce qua Hindus is governed by the procedure as set out in the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is a complete Code and provides for the conditions of marriage as well as the procedure for divorce. The contention of the learned counsel that petitioner No.1 had sought and got a Panchayati divorce is thus an argument that cannot be accepted.

As stated above, the petitioners, as individuals, would always be at liberty to approach the concerned Senior Superintendent of Police for redressal of their apprehensions regarding threats to their life and liberty.

An argument was raised by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are uneducated people and, hence, are not aware of the niceties of the law. In view of Section 4 of the Hindu Marriage Act,1955 all customs and usages ceased to have an effect.

The petitioner Nos.1 and 2 are alleged to have got married without petitioner No.1 obtaining a legally valid divorce from his first wife. The relatives of petitioner No.2 are against the relationship of the petitioners. The Hindu Marriage Act was enacted in the year 1955. However, the petitioners have since got married on 21.01.2021 at Gurudwara as per Sikh rites and ceremonies. 

It was noted thus that the learned counsel was relying upon a Panchayati divorce which has no recognition in the eyes of law. 

 

[READ ORDER]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

delhi-hc-stays-coercive-action-against-indigo-in-rs-458-crore-gst-compensation-dispute
Trending Business
Delhi HC Stays Coercive Action Against IndiGo In Rs. 458 Crore GST Compensation Dispute [Read Order]

Delhi High Court protected IndiGo from coercive action in a Rs. 458 crore GST dispute over compensation received from a foreign engine supplier.

26 May, 2026 01:31 PM
allahabad-hc-quashes-rs-62-lakh-electricity-demand-raised-two-years-after-billing-error
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Quashes Rs 62 Lakh Electricity Demand Raised Two Years After Billing Error [Read Judgment]

Allahabad HC quashed a Rs 62 lakh retrospective electricity demand, holding consumers cannot be penalised for a supply company’s tariff error.

26 May, 2026 01:39 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-approves-three-tier-nationwide-icu-framework-says-india-in-dreadful-position
Trending Judiciary
SC Approves Three-Tier Nationwide ICU Framework; Says India in “Dreadful Position”

Supreme Court approves nationwide three-tier ICU framework, calls India’s healthcare system in a “dreadful position”, and seeks urgent reforms.

21 May, 2026 10:55 AM
sc-pulls-up-sbi-says-banks-harass-small-borrowers-while-being-lenient-with-big-defaulters
Trending Judiciary
SC Pulls Up SBI, Says Banks Harass Small Borrowers While Being Lenient With Big Defaulters [Read Order]

Supreme Court criticised SBI and banks for being lenient with big defaulters while subjecting small borrowers to borderline harassment.

21 May, 2026 11:51 AM
sc-permits-euthanasia-of-rabid-dogs-orders-abc-centres-nationwide
Trending Judiciary
SC Permits Euthanasia of Rabid Dogs; Orders ABC Centres Nationwide [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds stray dog management directions, orders ABC centres in every district, and permits euthanasia of rabid dogs.

21 May, 2026 12:14 PM
sc-issues-notice-on-pil-seeking-ban-on-liquor-sold-in-tetra-packs-and-sachets
Trending Judiciary
SC Issues Notice on PIL Seeking Ban on Liquor Sold in Tetra Packs and Sachets

Supreme Court issues notice on PIL seeking ban on deceptive liquor tetra packs and sachets over public safety concerns.

21 May, 2026 12:28 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email