38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, April 27, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Rahul Gandhi Tenders Unconditional Apology Attributing Chowkidar Chor Hai Remark To SC

By LawStreet News Network      08 May, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Rahul Gandhi Tenders Unconditional Apology Attributing Chowkidar Chor Hai Remark To SC

The Indian National Congress President Rahul Gandhi today (May 8, 2019) has filed an affidavit in the Supreme Court tendering an unconditional apology for attributing the Chowkidar Chor Hai remark to the apex court.

The affidavit filed through advocate Sunil Fernandes, states that The Deponent unconditionally apologises for the wrongful attributions to this Honble Court. The Deponent further states that any such attributions were entirely unintentional, non-willful and inadvertent.

In his affidavit, the Congress President reiterated that he holds the court in the highest esteem and respect and has never sought or intended to, directly or indirectly, commit any act that interferes with the process of administration of justice.

Tendering unconditional apology, Gandhi prayed from the court to close the contempt proceedings that was initiated on a plea filed by BJP MP Meenakshi Lekhi.

Ms. Lekhi objected to his Chowkidar Chor Hai statement, in reference to Prime Minister Narendra Modi that was allegedly made in response to the Supreme Courts judgment concerning the maintainability of the Rafale review case.

On April 15, 2019, a Bench comprising of Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi and JusticesDeepak Gupta and Sanjiv Khanna sought Gandhis explanation after clarifying that the statement made by Gandhi on the Rafale case verdict was incorrectly attributed to the apex court.

We make it clear that views, observations, findings attributed to this court in the alleged speeches, remarks made by Mr. Gandhi to media/public have been incorrectly attributed to this court. We also make it clear that this court had no occasion to make such observations in as much as deciding legal admissibility of certain documents which were objected by the attorney general, the Bench had said.

Subsequently, Gandhi filed an affidavit submitting that the comment was made in the heat of the political campaigning and that is was misused by his political opponents.

On April 23, 2019, when the apex court issued notice in the matter, Gandhi stood by his statement in so far as it relates to Prime Minister Narendra Modi. However, Senior Advocate A.M. Singhvi, appearing for Gandhi expressed regret for attributing the slogan to Supreme Court.

On a request made by Singhvi, the court permitted Gandhi to file an additional affidavit in the case.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

delhi-hc-pronounces-judgment-on-kejriwals-recusal-plea-against-justice-swarna-kanta-sharma-in-liquor-policy-case
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Pronounces Judgment on Kejriwal’s Recusal Plea Against Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma in Liquor Policy Case

Delhi High Court rejects Kejriwal’s recusal plea, holding allegations of bias against Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma insufficient in liquor policy case.

21 April, 2026 11:16 AM
sc-dismisses-umar-khalids-review-petition-against-judgment-denying-bail-in-delhi-riots-larger-conspiracy-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses Umar Khalid’s Review Petition Against Judgment Denying Bail in Delhi Riots Larger Conspiracy Case [Read Order]

Supreme Court dismisses Umar Khalid’s review plea against bail denial in Delhi riots conspiracy case, finding no grounds to interfere with its earlier judgment.

21 April, 2026 11:58 AM
nashik-court-denies-interim-arrest-protection-to-nida-ejaz-khan-in-tcs-bpo-harassment-case-bail-hearing-set-for-april-27
Trending Crime, Police And Law
Nashik Court Denies Interim Arrest Protection to Nida Ejaz Khan in TCS BPO Harassment Case; Bail Hearing Set for April 27

Nashik Court denies interim arrest protection to Nida Ejaz Khan in TCS BPO harassment case; anticipatory bail hearing adjourned to April 27.

21 April, 2026 01:37 PM
legal-representatives-remedy-against-arbitral-award-lies-under-section-34-of-arbitration-act-not-under-article-227-of-the-constitution-sc
Trending Judiciary
Legal Representative’s Remedy Against Arbitral Award Lies Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act, Not Under Article 227 of the Constitution: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules legal heirs must challenge arbitral awards under Section 34, not Article 227, affirming Arbitration Act as a complete code.

21 April, 2026 01:51 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email