38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, March 06, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Sabarimala Case: SC To Consider Objections Raised By Senior Advocate Fali. S. Nariman And Others On The Reference Made To Larger Bench

By LawStreet News Network      06 February, 2020 11:02 AM      0 Comments
Sabarimala Case: SC To Consider Objections Raised By Senior Advocate Fali. S. Nariman And Others On The Reference Made To Larger Bench

The Supreme Court, on February 6, 2020 is scheduled to consider the objections raised by senior advocate Fali S. Nariman and others regarding reference made to larger bench in the Sabarimala Case.

Nariman, along with other senior advocates had, on February 3, 2020 raised the objections while a 9-judge bench had assembled to frame issues for deliberation regarding discrimination against women in various religious places and various religions. A bench comprising of CJI SA Bobde, justices R Banumathi, Ashok Bhushan, L Nageswara Rao, M M Shantanagoudar, S A Nazeer, R Subhash Reddy, B R Gavai and Surya Kant had started the exercise to frame questions for determining the judicial path to adjudicate faith vs fundamental right issues arising in women's entry into Sabarimala temple, mosque and Parsi Agiyari.

Nariman made various submissions before the court. He said that law can be settled as and when cases come up before the SC but court cannot be called upon to answer such questions in exercise of review jurisdiction. He said that the legal issues were answered by bench of 5 in 4 to 1 majority and that a review petition against such a decision was limited in scope. 

CJI Bobde had suggested that Nariman's point of limited scope of review matters may be considered as an issue in the matter. Senior Counsel Indira Jaising had suggested that the same may be treated as a preliminary issue. 

The court will, on Thursday consider the objections raised by Nariman and set the course for further proceedings.

 

Author: Shubham Jindal



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

maintenance-obligation-absolute-cannot-be-evaded-on-pretext-of-unemployment-or-pendency-of-other-proceedings-andhra-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Maintenance Obligation Absolute, Cannot Be Evaded on Pretext of Unemployment or Pendency of Other Proceedings: Andhra Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Andhra Pradesh High Court rules maintenance is absolute; unemployment or pending cases cannot excuse a husband from paying wife and child.

02 March, 2026 01:00 PM
allegations-in-abetment-to-suicide-case-cannot-travel-beyond-contents-of-suicide-note-telangana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Allegations in Abetment to Suicide Case Cannot Travel Beyond Contents of Suicide Note: Telangana HC [Read Order]

Telangana High Court quashes abetment to suicide case against 10 accused, holds complaint cannot go beyond contents of suicide note.

02 March, 2026 01:48 PM
epf-penalty-for-delayed-contribution-cannot-be-reduced-below-25-of-arrears-cgit-order-modified-karnataka-hc
Trending Judiciary
EPF Penalty for Delayed Contribution Cannot Be Reduced Below 25% of Arrears; CGIT Order Modified: Karnataka HC [Read Order]

Karnataka High Court rules EPF penalty for delayed PF contributions cannot be reduced below 25% of arrears including interest; CGIT order modified.

02 March, 2026 01:57 PM
scwla-condemns-kanpur-bar-association-holi-event-seeks-disciplinary-action-and-gender-sensitisation-guidelines
Trending Legal Insiders
SCWLA Condemns Kanpur Bar Association Holi Event, Seeks Disciplinary Action & Gender Sensitisation Guidelines [Read Press Release]

SCWLA condemns Kanpur Bar Holi event, seeks apology, disciplinary action & gender sensitisation norms over alleged objectification of women.

02 March, 2026 03:23 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email