38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, December 25, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC Adjourns Trial Of 11-Year-Old Contempt Case Against Prashant Bhushan

By Ghazal Bhootra      26 July, 2020 12:24 PM      0 Comments
SC Adjourns Old Contempt Case Prashant Bhushan

Prashant Bhushan passed some comments against the Supreme Court judges during an interview to Tehelka magazine 11 years ago, in 2009.

The Supreme Court on July 24, 2020, adjourned the hearing of a contempt case against Advocate Prashant Bhushan. The contempt of court case was filed by Advocate Harish Salve.

We need to hear the matter, will give you time so as to let you prepare to your satisfaction, a one-judge bench consisting of Justice Arun Mishra said to Senior Advocate Rajeev Dhavan, who was present on the side of Prashant Bhushan. The senior advocate mentioned that he requires a little time to analyze the previous records and get ready for the trial, as Advocate Ram Jethmalani, who was the previous representative for the Bhushan, passed away in 2019.

Congress politician Kapil Sibal, present on behalf of former Tehelka Editor-in-Chief Tarun Tejpal, also asked for some time, mentioning that a lot of years had passed, given the case was filed in 2009.

Senior Advocate Shanti Bhushan, of the age of 94, the father of Prashant Bhushan, desired from the court to be indicted in the case. But the court said: Mr [Shanti] Bhushan, you are too senior to be impleaded. This is a suo motu issue and your argument is not a legal one, but an emotional one.

During the interview Prashant Bhushan gave to reporter Shoma Chaudhury of Tehelka magazine, he accused half of the 16 previous chief justices of the Supreme Court to be corrupt. Bhushan admitted that he had no proof for his allegation, as was mentioned in the complaint filed against the lawyer. The advocate had also condemned former Chief Justice SH Kapadia for judging the Niyamgiri mining case involving Vedanta/Sterlite, even though he held shares in Sterlite.

A three-judge bench of the apex court had adjudged the contempt petition to be maintainable, on November 10, 2010. The case had been heard on 17 different occasions, with the last hearing being on May 2, 2012.

Prashant Bhushan is also being held for contempt in another case, which involves some of his posts (tweets) on Twitter. Twitter India is also party to the case and accused. The court mentioned that the tweets posted by Bhushan on June 27, 2020, and 29, 2020 contemptuous of the court. The first tweet commented about an undeclared emergency and the role of the Supreme Court and the last four chief justices of India. The second tweet was about Chief Justice SA Bobde trying a Harley Davidson superbike in his hometown Nagpur.

The Supreme Court had also held Bhushan contemptuous of the court in 2013 when he had made disturbing remarks against the judges hearing the coal scam. Bhushan had asked why the court did not take action against Attorney General Goolam E Vahanvati, in the UPA government, for allegedly lying in court. He then issued an apology to the court.

A little while back, in March 2019, Bhushan did not accept the apex courts offer to unconditionally apologize to the court for asking that Justice Arun Mishra recuse himself from hearing a contempt plea against him. In February 2019, Attorney General KK Venugopal had issued a contempt petition in the Supreme Court against Bhushan for allegedly scandalizing the court with his tweets on the turmoil in the Central Bureau of Investigation.

 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

bhagavad-gita-not-a-religious-text-fcra-registration-cannot-be-denied-for-teaching-gita-and-yoga-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Bhagavad Gita Not a Religious Text; FCRA Registration Cannot Be Denied for Teaching Gita and Yoga: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules Bhagavad Gita is not a religious text; FCRA registration cannot be denied to organisations teaching Gita and Yoga.

24 December, 2025 05:35 PM
two-distinct-reliefs-cannot-be-intermingled-in-a-single-writ-petition-sc
Trending Judiciary
Two Distinct Reliefs Cannot Be Intermingled in a Single Writ Petition: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that distinct reliefs cannot be combined in one writ petition, allowing withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh plea limited to one relief.

24 December, 2025 05:45 PM

TOP STORIES

fight-4-justice-awards-2025-live4freedom-and-dhcba-to-honour-landmark-legal-struggles
Trending Events & Opportunity
Fight 4 Justice Awards 2025: Live4Freedom and DHCBA to Honour Landmark Legal Struggles

Fight 4 Justice Awards 2025 on Dec 20: Justice N. Kotiswar Singh as Chief Guest; Live4Freedom and DHCBA honour landmark legal struggles.

20 December, 2025 04:30 PM
madras-hc-calls-for-audit-of-fees-paid-to-law-officers-criticises-exorbitant-payments-and-unnecessary-appearances-by-additional-advocate-generals
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Calls for Audit of Fees Paid to Law Officers; Criticises Exorbitant Payments and Unnecessary Appearances by Additional Advocate Generals [Read Order]

Madras High Court calls for audit of fees paid to law officers, flags exorbitant payments and unnecessary appearances by Additional Advocate Generals.

22 December, 2025 08:56 PM
child-born-within-four-months-of-marriage-entitled-to-inheritance-sec-112-of-evidence-act-raises-conclusive-presumption-of-legitimacy-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Born Within Four Months Of Marriage Entitled To Inheritance; Sec 112 of Evidence Act Raises Conclusive Presumption of Legitimacy: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that a child born within four months of marriage is legitimate and entitled to inheritance under Section 112 of the Evidence Act.

22 December, 2025 09:07 PM
delhi-hc-stays-cbi-summons-to-advocate-sachin-bajpai-says-lawyers-cannot-be-treated-as-suspects-for-discharging-professional-duties
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Stays CBI Summons to Advocate Sachin Bajpai, Says Lawyers Cannot Be Treated as Suspects for Discharging Professional Duties [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court stays CBI summons to advocate Sachin Bajpai, holding lawyers cannot be treated as suspects for acts done in professional duty.

22 December, 2025 10:52 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email